Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 1991; 65(04): 360-363
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1648152
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Lack of Agreement of Chromogenic and Glotting Assays for Factor X and Protein C in Warfarinised Plasma

P Han
The Haematology Division, Laboratory Medicine and Department of Paediatrics, National University Hospital, Singapore
,
K P Fung
The Haematology Division, Laboratory Medicine and Department of Paediatrics, National University Hospital, Singapore
,
U Rahdakrishnan
The Haematology Division, Laboratory Medicine and Department of Paediatrics, National University Hospital, Singapore
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 27 December 1989

Accepted after revision 26 November 1990

Publication Date:
02 July 2018 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Coagulation serine proteases can be measured with either a chromogenic substrate assay or a clotting assay using deficient plasmas. It is a concern whether both assays give similar quantitative results, in particular in plasma obtained fiom patients on long term warfarin therapy. If these two assay methods were interchangeable, then the chromogenic substrate assay has the advantages of precision as well as laboratory automation. We used the intraclass correlation coefficient (r1) to assess the agreement between the two methods in measuring factor X and protein C levels in warfarinised plasma. The results indicate that the extent and pattern of agreement of the two methods for the measurement of the two variables in warfarinised plasma are poor, despite high Pearson product moment coefficients of correlation.

 

  • References

  • 1 van Wijk EM. Factor X and its behaviour in antivitamin K treatment and other deficiency states. Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1981
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bergstrom K, Egberg N. Determination of vitamin K sensitive coagulation factors in plasma. Studies on three methods using synthetic chromogenic substrates Thromb Res 1978; 12: 531-541
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Famodu AA, Ingram GIC, Darby SC. Anticoagulant control with chromogenic measurements of factors X and VIII. Thromb Haemostas 1979; 42: 292 Abstr
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods, 7th edn. Iowa State University Press; Ames, IA: 1981
  • 5 Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rate reliability. hychol Bull 1979; 22: 4204
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Fleiss JL, Shrout PE. Approximate interval estimation for a certain intraclass correlation coefficient. kychometrika 1978; 43: 259-262
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Nathan IV, Han P, Pradhan MM. Protein C functional assay using snake venom activator. Thromb Res 1987; 47: 85-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lee J, Koh D, Ong CN. Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable. Comput Biol Med 1989; 19: 61-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Fung KP, Lee J. Basic program to assess the extent pattern of agreement between two procedures. Comput Appl Biol Sci 1990; 6: 54
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Oldham PD. Measurement in Medicine. JB Lippincott; Philadelphia, PA: 1968
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Burdock EL, Fleiss JL, Hardesty AS. A new view of interobserver agreement. Perspect Psychol 1963; 16: 373-384
    PubMedGoogle Scholar