The Relationship between the Etiology of Profound Prelingual Sensorineural Hearing Loss and the Results of Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials

Alice Andrade Takeuti; Ana Paula Sousa Correa; Elisa Morais Leao; Mariana Lopes Favero

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1649491

International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 23(01): 001-006
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1649491

Original Research

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

The Relationship between the Etiology of Profound Prelingual Sensorineural Hearing Loss and the Results of Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials

Alice Andrade Takeuti

¹Division of Education and Rehabilitation of Communication Disorders (Derdic), Speech Therapy Department, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

,

Ana Paula Sousa Correa

¹Division of Education and Rehabilitation of Communication Disorders (Derdic), Speech Therapy Department, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

,

Elisa Morais Leao

¹Division of Education and Rehabilitation of Communication Disorders (Derdic), Speech Therapy Department, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

,

Mariana Lopes Favero

¹Division of Education and Rehabilitation of Communication Disorders (Derdic), Speech Therapy Department, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Introduction Cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) are biphasic, short latency potentials, which represent the inhibition of the contraction of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) mediated by the saccule, the inferior vestibular nerve, the vestibular nuclei and the medial vestibular spinal tract.

Objective To evaluate the response of cVEMPs in individuals with profound prelingual bilateral cochlear hearing loss.

Methods A prospective case-control study. A total of 64 volunteers, divided into a study group (31 patients with profound prelingual sensorineural hearing loss) and a control group (33 subjects matched for age and gender with psychoacoustic thresholds of ≤ 25 dB HL between 500 and 8,000 Hz) were submitted to the cVEMP exam. The causes of hearing loss were grouped by etiology and the involved period.

Results The subjects of the study group are more likely to present changes in cVEMPs compared to the control group (35.5% versus 6.1% respectively; p = 0.003), with an odds ratio (OR) of 8.52 (p = 0.009). It means that they had 8.52-fold higher propensity of presenting altered cVEMP results. There were no statistically significant differences between the latencies, the interamplitude and the asymmetry index. Regarding the etiology, there was a statistically significant difference when the cause was infectious, with an OR of 15.50 (p = 0.005), and when the impairment occurred in the prenatal period, with an OR of 9.86 (p = 0.009).

Conclusion The present study showed abnormalities in the sacculocolic pathway in a considerable portion of individuals with profound prelingual sensorineural hearing loss due to infectious and congenital causes, as revealed by the cVEMP results.

Keywords

Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials - hearing loss - prelingual deafness - deafness

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Felipe L, Kingma H, Gonçalves DU. Potencial evocado miogênico vestibular. Arq Int Otorrinolaringol 2012; 16 (1): 103-107 . Doi: 10.7162/S1809-48722012000100015
2 Colebatch JG, Halmagyi GM, Skuse NF. Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57 (02) 190-197 . Doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.2.190
3 Bansal S, Sahni S, Sinha S. Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in individuals with severe to profound hearing loss. J Hear Sci 2013; 3 (04) 56-63 http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=2083389X&AN=95785356&h=jtm%2F69%2B1shVu7dTEro6hLA5HxrnjjqieU%2FDbfA7T%2Bvv4ze8fdiXXMzL2rC5BA0Tio8NEsciuLBlagdOPuz2eCw%3D%3D&crl=c Accessed May 13, 2014
4 Mudduwa R, Kara N, Whelan D, Banerjee A. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: review. J Laryngol Otol 2010; 124 (10) 1043-1050 . Doi: 10.1017/S0022215110001234
5 Singh S, Gupta RK, Kumar P. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in children with sensorineural hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 76 (09) 1308-1311 . Doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.05.025
6 Papathanasiou ES, Murofushi T, Akin FW, Colebatch JG. International guidelines for the clinical application of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: an expert consensus report. Clin Neurophysiol 2014; 125 (04) 658-666 . Doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.11.042
7 Khan F, Balraj A, Lepcha A. Vestibular evoked myogenic potential in sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Indian J Otol 2013; 19: 55 . Doi: 10.4103/0971-7749.113504
8 Sazgar AA, Dortaj V, Akrami K, Akrami S, Karimi Yazdi AR. Saccular damage in patients with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 263 (07) 608-613 . Doi: 10.1007/s00405-006-0038-6
9 Zagólski O. Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials and caloric stimulation in infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Laryngol Otol 2008; 122 (06) 574-579 . Doi: 10.1017/S0022215107000412
10 Tribukait A, Brantberg K, Bergenius J. Function of semicircular canals, utricles and saccules in deaf children. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124 (01) 41-48 . Doi: 10.1080/00016480310002113
11 Clark DL, Arnold LE, Crowl L. , et al. Vestibular Stimulation for ADHD: randomized controlled trial of Comprehensive Motion Apparatus. J Atten Disord 2008; 11 (05) 599-611
12 Nakajima Y, Kaga K, Takekoshi H, Sakuraba K. Evaluation of vestibular and dynamic visual acuity in adults with congenital deafness. Percept Mot Skills 2012; 115 (02) 503-511 . Doi: 10.2466/15.06.25.PMS.115.5.503-511