Comparison of the Accuracy of Impedance Plethysmography and Compression Ultrasonography in Outpatients with Clinically Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis

Summary

Impedance plethysmography (IPG) and compression ultrasonography (CUS) have been reported to be highly accurate for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in symptomatic patients. In many centres CUS has become the method of choice. However, direct comparisons of the accuracy of IPG to CUS have not been performed. To determine the test of choice we performed a two centre prospective comparison of IPG and CUS, with venography, and determined how the size and distribution of thrombi influenced the accuracy of each test. 495 symptomatic outpatients with suspected DVT had evaluable venograms. The prevalence of DVT was 27% (130/495), 84% (109) of which were proximal. The sensitivity of IPG and CUS for proximal vein thrombosis was 77% and 90% respectively (p = .002). The specificity of IPG was 93% whereas the specificity of CUS was 98% (p = 0.04). There were significant differences in accuracy between the two centres as a consequence of differences in the size and location of thrombi. The majority of proximal thrombi not detected by IPG and CUS involved less than 5 cm of the distal half of the popliteal vein and most of these thrombi occurred in one centre. Exclusion of these thrombi from the analysis increases the sensitivity of CUS to 99% (86/87) and IPG to 91% (72/79), for proximal thrombi (p = .019). The positive predictive value of CUS was strongly influenced by the number of abnormal venous segments (three sites were examined); 100% (80/80) if two or three sites were abnormal, but only 68% if a single site was involved. We conclude that: 1) CUS is more accurate than the IPG for the diagnosis of DVT in symptomatic outpatients, and this relationship holds true regardless of the size or location of the DVT, 2) the sensitivities of IPG and CUS are much lower for small proximal DVT, and 3) confirmatory venography is warranted if the abnormality with CUS is limited to one venous segment.

• References

• 1 Haeger K. Problems of acute deep venous thrombosis. The interpretation of signs and symptoms Angiology 1969; 20: 219-223
• 2 Bettmann MA, Robbins A, Braun SD, Wetzner S, Dunnick NR, Finkelstein J. Contrast venography of the leg: Diagnostic efficacy, tolerance and complication rates with ionic and non-ionic contrast media. Radiology 1987; 165: 113-116
• 3 Hull R, Van Aken WG, Hirsh J, Gallus AS, Hoicka G, Turpie AG G, Walker I, Gent M. Impedance plethysmography using the occlusive cuff technique in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis. Circulation 1976; 53: 696-700
• 4 Flanigan DP, Goodreau JJ, Burnham SJ, Bergan JJ, Yao JS T. Vascular laboratory diagnosis of clinically suspected acute deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1978; 1: 331-334
• 5 Cooperman M, Martin EW, Satiani B, Clark M, Evans WE. Detection of deep vein thrombosis by IPG. Am J Surg 1979; 137: 252-254
• 6 Toy PT C Y, Schrier SL. Occlusive impedance plethysmography: A noninvasive method of diagnosis of proximal deep vein thrombosis. West J Med 1978; 129: 89-93
• 7 Anderson DR, Lensing AW A, Wells PS, Levine MN, Weitz JI, Hirsh J. Limitations of impedance plethysmography in the diagnosis of clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. Ann Int Med 1993; 118: 25-30
• 8 Hull R, Hirsh J, Carter CJ, Jay RM, Ockelford PA, Buller HR, Turpie AG G, Powers P, Kinch D, Dodd PE, Gill GJ, Leelere JR, Gent M. Diagnostic efficacy of IPG for clinically suspected DVT. Ann Int Med 1985; 102: 21-28
• 9 Impedance plethysmography and DVT diagnosis |Letlers|. Ann Int Med 1993; 119: 246-247
• 10 Dauzat MM, Laroche JP, Charras C, Blim B, Domingo-Faye MM, Sainte-Luce P, Domergue A, Lopez EM, Janbon C. Real-time B-mode ultrasonography for better specificity in the noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. J Ultrasound Med 1986; 5: 625-630
• 11 Lensing AW A, Prandoni P, Brandjes D, Huisman PM, Vigo M, Tomasella G, Kekt J, ten Cate JW, Huisman MV, Buller HR. Detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography. N Eng j Med 1989; 320: 342-345
• 12 Habscheid W, Hohmann M, Wilhelm T, Epping j. Real-time ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity. Angiology 1990; 599-602
• 13 Chance JE, Abbitt PL, Tegtmeyer CJ, Powers RD. Real-time ultrasound for the detection of deep vein thrombosis. Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20: 494-496
• 14 Rabinov K, Paulin S. Roentgen diagnosis of venous thrombosis in the leg. Arch Surg 1972; 104: 134-144
• 15 Suissa S, Shuster JJ. The 2 × 2 matched-pairs trial: exact unconditional design and analysis. Biometrics 1991; 47: 361-372
• 16 Colton T. Statistics in Medicine. Boston: Little Brown Co; 1974: 174
• 17 Simel DL, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 763-770
• 18 Mitchell DC, Grasty MS, Stebbings WS L, Nockler IB, Lewars MD, Levison RA, Wood RF. Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and venography in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 611-613
• 19 Rose ST, Zweibel WJ, Nelson BD, Priest DL, Knighton RA, Brown JW, Lawrence PF, Stults BM, Reading JC, Miller FJ. Symptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: Accuracy, limitations and role of colour duplex flow imaging in diagnosis. Radiology 1990; 175: 639-644
• 20 Baxter GM, McKechnie S, Duffy P. Colour Doppler ultrasound in deep venous thrombosis: a comparison with venography. Clin Radiol 1990; 42: 32-36
• 21 Ransohoff DF, Feinstein AR. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med 1978; 299: 926-930
• 22 Cogo A, Lensing AW A, Prandoni P, Buller HR, Girolami A, ten Cate JW. Comparison of real-time B-mode ultrasonography and Doppler ultrasound with contrast venography in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. Thromb Haemost 1993; 70: 404-407
• 23 Cogo A, Lensing AW A, Prandoni P, Hirsh J. Distribution of thrombosis in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. Arch Int Med 1993; 153: 2777-2780