Analysis of the Effect of Musical Stimulation on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials

Daiane Damaris Baptista de Lima; Simone Fiuza Regaçone; Anna Caroline Silva de Oliveira; Yara Bagali Alcântara; Eduardo Federighi Baisi Chagas; Ana Claudia Figueiredo Frizzo

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1651507

International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 23(01): 031-035
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1651507

Original Research

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Analysis of the Effect of Musical Stimulation on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials

Daiane Damaris Baptista de Lima

¹Department of Speech Therapy and Audiology, Faculty of Philosophy and Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista, (FFC/UNESP), Marília (SP), Brazil

,

Simone Fiuza Regaçone

²Department of Speech Therapy and Audiology, Dentistry School of Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo (FOB/USP), Bauru (SP), Brazil

,

Anna Caroline Silva de Oliveira

¹Department of Speech Therapy and Audiology, Faculty of Philosophy and Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista, (FFC/UNESP), Marília (SP), Brazil

,

Yara Bagali Alcântara

¹Department of Speech Therapy and Audiology, Faculty of Philosophy and Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista, (FFC/UNESP), Marília (SP), Brazil

,

Eduardo Federighi Baisi Chagas

³Postgraduate Program in Human Development and Technology, Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters of Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil; Department of Physical Education, Universidade de Marília, SP, Brazil

,

Ana Claudia Figueiredo Frizzo

¹Department of Speech Therapy and Audiology, Faculty of Philosophy and Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista, (FFC/UNESP), Marília (SP), Brazil

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Introduction Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) are bioelectric responses that occur from acoustic stimulations, and they assess the functionality of the central auditory system.

Objective The objective of the present study was to analyze the effect of musical stimulation on CAEPs.

Methods The sample consisted of 42 healthy female subjects, aged between 18 and 24 years, divided into two groups – G1: without musical stimulation prior to the CAEP examination; and G2: with stimulation prior to the examination. In both groups, as a pre-collection procedure, the complete basic audiological evaluation was performed. For the musical stimulation performed in G2, we used an MP4 player programmed to play Pachelbel's “Canon in D Major” for five minutes prior to the CAEP examination. To analyze the effect on the groups, the ear side and the ide–group interaction , a mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) of repeated measures was performed. Box M test and Mauchly sphericity test were also performed.

Results Test differences were considered statistically significant when the p-value was < 0.05 (5%). Thus, it was possible to observe that there was a statistically significant difference of the P2 component characterized by the decrease in the amplitude of response in the left ear in G2 when comparing the responses of CAEP with and without prior musical stimulation.

Conclusion The result of the present study enabled us to conclude that there was a change in the response of CAEPs with musical stimulation.

Keywords

electrophysiology - music - auditory evoked potentials

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 McPherson DL. Late potentials of the auditory system. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 1996
2 J. H. Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2006
3 Fiser J, Berkes P, Orbán G, Lengyel M. Statistically optimal perception and learning: from behavior to neural representations. Trends Cogn Sci 2010; 14 (03) 119-130
4 Habibi A, Cahn BR, Damasio A, Damasio H. Neural correlates of accelerated auditory processing in children engaged in music training. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2016; 21: 1-14
5 Emerson S, Daltrozzo J, Conway C. The Effect of Music Experience on Auditory Sequential Learning: An ERP Study. Proc Cogn Sci Soc. 2014; 36 (36) xx
6 Shahin A, Roberts LE, Pantev C, Trainor LJ, Ross B. Modulation of P2 auditory-evoked responses by the spectral complexity of musical sounds. Neuroreport 2005; 16 (16) 1781-1785
7 Looi V, Gfeller K, Driscoll V. Music Appreciation and Training for Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Review. Semin Hear 2012; 33 (04) 307-334
8 Hutter E, Argstatter H, Grapp M, Plinkert PK. Music therapy as specific and complementary training for adults after cochlear implantation: A pilot study. Cochlear Implants Int 2015; 16 (Suppl. 03) S13-S21
9 Liang C, Earl B, Thompson I. , et al. Musicians Are Better than Non-musicians in Frequency Change Detection: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence. Front Neurosci 2016; 10: 464
10 Sturm I, Dähne S, Blankertz B, Curio G. Multi-Variate EEG Analysis as a Novel Tool to Examine Brain Responses to Naturalistic Music Stimuli. PLoS One 2015; 10 (10) e0141281
11 Ross B, Fujioka T. 40-Hz oscillations underlying perceptual binding in young and older adults. Psychophysiology 2016; 53 (07) 974-990
12 Sá CI, Pereira LD. Musical rhythms and their influence on P300 velocity in young females. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol (Engl Ed) 2011; 77 (02) 158-162
13 Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 1970; 92 (04) 311-324
14 Lloyd LL, Kaplan H. Audiometric Interpretation: a manual of basic audiometry. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1978
15 Junqueira CAO, Colafêmina JF. Investigação da estabilidade inter e intra-examinador na identificação do P300 auditivo: análise de erros. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2002; 68 (04) 468-478
16 Polich J, Howard L, Starr A. Effects of age on the P300 component of the event-related potential from auditory stimuli: peak definition, variation, and measurement. J Gerontol 1985; 40 (06) 721-726
17 Seppänen M, Pesonen AK, Tervaniemi M. Music training enhances the rapid plasticity of P3a/P3b event-related brain potentials for unattended and attended target sounds. Atten Percept Psychophys 2012; 74 (03) 600-612
18 Tremblay KL, Ross B, Inoue K, McClannahan K, Collet G. Is the auditory evoked P2 response a biomarker of learning?. Front Syst Neurosci 2014; 8: 28
19 Naatanen RPT. N2 and Automatic versus Controlled Processes. In: Mccallum WC, Zappoli RDF. , editor. Cerebral psychophysiology: Studies in event-related potentials. New York: Elsevier; 1986: 169-186
20 Stewart L, von Kriegstein K, Warren JD, Griffiths TD. Music and the brain: disorders of musical listening. Brain 2006; 129 (Pt 10): 2533-2553
21 Luria AR. Higher cortical functions in man. Basic Books; 1980: 634
22 O'Brien JL, Nikjeh DA, Lister JJ. Interaction of Musicianship and Aging: A Comparison of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials. Behav Neurol 2015; 2015: 545917
23 Pandey AK, Kamarajan C, Tang Y. , et al. Neurocognitive deficits in male alcoholics: an ERP/sLORETA analysis of the N2 component in an equal probability Go/NoGo task. Biol Psychol 2012; 89 (01) 170-182
24 Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on. Trends Cogn Sci 2014; 18 (04) 177-185
25 Kok A. Event-related-potential (ERP) reflections of mental resources: a review and synthesis. Biol Psychol 1997; 45 (1-3): 19-56
26 Fitzroy AB, Sanders LD. Musical Meter Modulates the Allocation of Attention across Time. J Cogn Neurosci 2015; 27 (12) 2339-2351