Senologie - Zeitschrift für Mammadiagnostik und -therapie 2018; 15(02): e12
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1651702
Abstracts
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Internal surgical adhesive reduces invasiveness/discomfort in DIEP flap breast reconstruction procedures by generating a Drain-Free donor site wound closure. Retrospective case series assessing TissuGlu®

S Fertsch
1   SANA Krankenhaus Düsseldorf-Gerresheim, Plastische Chirurgie, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
,
M Hagouan
1   SANA Krankenhaus Düsseldorf-Gerresheim, Plastische Chirurgie, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
,
C Andree
1   SANA Krankenhaus Düsseldorf-Gerresheim, Plastische Chirurgie, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 May 2018 (online)

 

Introduction:

Use of drains is invasive, breaching the skin barrier, leaving a foreign body within the wound and causing patient discomfort. Monitoring and cleaning of drains and exit wounds also consumes nursing resources. Elimination of donor site drain use would be preferable. This study retrospectively assessed the effectiveness of a high strength lysine-based adhesive in reducing overall invasiveness compared to standard donor site wound closure with drains in a DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction Procedure.

Methods:

Data was retrospectively collected for 58 patients, meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria, who underwent a DIEP flap breast reconstruction procedure with standard donor site wound closure with drains (SWC) or with TissuGlu® and no drains (TissuGlu). Exclusion criteria included current smoker, BMI> 28 and active SSRI drug prescriptions. The primary outcome measured assessed overall invasiveness using the number of fluid related clinical interventions, including drain use and needle aspirations. Secondary endpoints included total wound drainage, cumulative days of treatment, and length of hospital stay.

Results:

See table below. (Mean ± SD)

Number of fluid related clinical interventions

2.0 ± 0.4 (59 total interventions)

0.2 ± 0.5 (5 total interventions)

< 0.0001

Total wound drainage (mL)

335.5 ± 179.4

13.8 ± 52.7

< 0.0001

Cumulative days of invasive treatment

6.2 ± 1.5

0.2 ± 0.6

< 0.0001

Post-op length of hospital stay (days)

8.3 ± 1.3

7.9 ± 1.8

0.0930

Overall Results – second column describes the Control Group (n = 29), third column shows the TissuGlu Group (n = 29), forth column reports the p-value

Conclusion:

The study shows that the drain-free donor site DIEP flap procedure is a less invasive and more patient friendly alternative to the conventional method with drains. A prospective, randomized study would be an appropriate next step.