PDF herunterladen
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2018; 22(04): 386-397
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1653953
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Knee Imaging Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: The Surgeon's and Radiologist's Perspectives

Ramya Srinivasan
1   Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
2   Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
,
Jennifer Wan
1   Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
,
Christina R. Allen
3   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
,
Lynne S. Steinbach
1   Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
22. August 2018 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common injuries that if left untreated can result in chronic instability, cartilage damage, meniscal tears, and ligamentous injuries, eventually leading to early osteoarthritis. ACL reconstruction surgeries are therefore increasingly being performed. Despite the fact that most patients achieve excellent postoperative results, patients can present with recurrent instability and pain. These patients often undergo imaging with radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or computed tomography. An understanding of the imaging appearance of the normal ACL reconstruction and common causes of failure is therefore essential for the interpreting radiologist. This article reviews surgical techniques for ACL reconstruction, highlighting recent technical advances, the normal imaging appearance after ACL reconstruction, etiologies for reconstruction failure, and the diagnosis of these with the aid of imaging.

Keywords

ACL reconstruction - ACL reconstruction complications - ACL reconstruction MRI - ACL graft tear
 

  • References

  • 1 Facchetti L, Schwaiger BJ, Gersing AS. , et al; UCSF-P50-ACL Consortium; AF-ACL Consortium. Cyclops lesions detected by MRI are frequent findings after ACL surgical reconstruction but do not impact clinical outcome over 2 years. Eur Radiol 2017; 27 (08) 3499-3508
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Evans NA, Jackson DW. Arthroscopic management of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. In: McGinty JB, Burkhart SS, Jackson RW, Johnson DH, Richmond JC. , eds. Operative Arthroscopy. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003: 347-365
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ. , et al. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: a 21-year population-based study. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (06) 1502-1507
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Allen CR, Giffin JR, Harner CD. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop Clin North Am 2003; 34 (01) 79-98
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Reinhardt KR, Hetsroni I, Marx RG. Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a level I systematic review comparing failure rates and functional outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am 2010; 41 (02) 249-262
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Crawford SN, Waterman BR, Lubowitz JH. Long-term failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (09) 1566-1571
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Freedman KB, D'Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach Jr BR. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31 (01) 2-11
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, Hewett TE, Krych AJ. Hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction: is there a difference in graft failure rate? A meta-analysis of 47,613 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (10) 2459-2468
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Giaconi JC, Allen CR, Steinbach LS. Anterior cruciate ligament graft reconstruction: clinical, technical, and imaging overview. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 20 (03) 129-150
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Williams III RJ, Hyman J, Petrigliano F, Rozental T, Wickiewicz TL. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (02) 225-232
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Charalambous CP, Kwaees TA. Anatomical considerations in hamstring tendon harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 2013; 2 (04) 253-257
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Tuman JM, Diduch DR, Rubino LJ, Baumfeld JA, Nguyen HS, Hart JM. Predictors for hamstring graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (11) 1945-1949
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Marrale J, Morrissey MC, Haddad FS. A literature review of autograft and allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007; 15 (06) 690-704
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Konrath JM, Vertullo CJ, Kennedy BA, Bush HS, Barrett RS, Lloyd DG. Morphologic characteristics and strength of the hamstring muscles remain altered at 2 years after use of a hamstring tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (10) 2589-2598
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Bryant AL, Creaby MW, Newton RU, Steele JR. Dynamic restraint capacity of the hamstring muscles has important functional implications after anterior cruciate ligament injury and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89 (12) 2324-2331
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Qu J, Thoreson AR, An KN, Amadio PC, Zhao C. What is the best candidate allograft for ACL reconstruction? An in vitro mechanical and histologic study in a canine model. J Biomech 2015; 48 (10) 1811-1816
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Kaeding CC, Aros B, Pedroza A. , et al. Allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: predictors of failure from a MOON prospective longitudinal cohort. Sports Health 2011; 3 (01) 73-81
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Stucken C, Garras DN, Shaner JL, Cohen SB. Infections in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Health 2013; 5 (06) 553-557
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Legnani C, Ventura A, Terzaghi C, Borgo E, Albisetti W. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with synthetic grafts. A review of literature. Int Orthop 2010; 34 (04) 465-471
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Liu ZT, Zhang XL, Jiang Y, Zeng BF. Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop 2010; 34 (01) 45-49
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Lavoie P, Fletcher J, Duval N. Patient satisfaction needs as related to knee stability and objective findings after ACL reconstruction using the LARS artificial ligament. Knee 2000; 7 (03) 157-163
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Proffen BL, Sieker JT, Murray MM. Bio-enhanced repair of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (05) 990-997
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Vavken P, Sadoghi P, Murray MM. The effect of platelet concentrates on graft maturation and graft-bone interface healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in human patients: a systematic review of controlled trials. Arthroscopy 2011; 27 (11) 1573-1583
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Murray MM, Spindler KP, Abreu E. , et al. Collagen-platelet rich plasma hydrogel enhances primary repair of the porcine anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Res 2007; 25 (01) 81-91
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Hirzinger C, Tauber M, Korntner S. , et al. ACL injuries and stem cell therapy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014; 134 (11) 1573-1578
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Silva A, Sampaio R, Fernandes R, Pinto E. Is there a role for adult non-cultivated bone marrow stem cells in ACL reconstruction?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (01) 66-71
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Dienst M, Burks RT, Greis PE. Anatomy and biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthop Clin North Am 2002; 33 (04) 605-620 , v
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Breland R, Metzler A, Johnson DL. Indications for 2-incision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Orthopedics 2013; 36 (09) 708-711
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Rayan F, Nanjayan SK, Quah C, Ramoutar D, Konan S, Haddad FS. Review of evolution of tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. World J Orthop 2015; 6 (02) 252-262
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Meredick RB, Vance KJ, Appleby D, Lubowitz JH. Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (07) 1414-1421
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Yang J, Fu S, Song Y. A prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate clinico-radiological outcome of arthroscopic single bundle versus double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int J Clin Exp Med 2017; 10 (01) 1087-1093
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Casagranda BU, Maxwell NJ, Kavanagh EC, Towers JD, Shen W, Fu FH. Normal appearance and complications of double-bundle and selective-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using optimal MRI techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192 (05) 1407-1415
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Lee YS, Nam SW, Sim JA, Lee BK. Comparison of anatomic ACL reconstruction between selective bundle reconstruction and double-bundle reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (11) 2803-2810
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Zappia M, Capasso R, Berritto D. , et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MR imaging findings. Musculoskelet Surg 2017; 101 (Suppl. 01) 23-35
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Recht MP, Kramer J. MR imaging of the postoperative knee: a pictorial essay. Radiographics 2002; 22 (04) 765-774
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Meyers AB, Haims AH, Menn K, Moukaddam H. Imaging of anterior cruciate ligament repair and its complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194 (02) 476-484
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Saupe N, White LM, Chiavaras MM. , et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction grafts: MR imaging features at long-term follow-up--correlation with functional and clinical evaluation. Radiology 2008; 249 (02) 581-590
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Malinin TI, Levitt RL, Bashore C, Temple HT, Mnaymneh W. A study of retrieved allografts used to replace anterior cruciate ligaments. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (02) 163-170
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Kim M, Choi YS, Kim H, Choi NH. Postoperative evaluation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: measurements and abnormalities on radiographic and CT imaging. Korean J Radiol 2016; 17 (06) 919-930
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Denti M, Lo Vetere D, Bait C, Schönhuber H, Melegati G, Volpi P. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: causes of failure, surgical technique, and clinical results. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (10) 1896-1902
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Bencardino JT, Beltran J, Feldman MI, Rose DJ. MR imaging of complications of anterior cruciate ligament graft reconstruction. Radiographics 2009; 29 (07) 2115-2126
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T. Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 1997; 10 (01) 14-21 ; discussion 21–22
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Dhawan A, Gallo RA, Lynch SA. Anatomic tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016; 24 (07) 443-454
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 44 Rizer M, Foremny GB, Rush III A. , et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel size: causes of tunnel enlargement and implications for single versus two-stage revision reconstruction. Skeletal Radiol 2017; 46 (02) 161-169
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 45 Horton LK, Jacobson JA, Lin J, Hayes CW. MR imaging of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175 (04) 1091-1097
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 46 Rispoli DM, Sanders TG, Miller MD, Morrison WB. Magnetic resonance imaging at different time periods following hamstring harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2001; 17 (01) 2-8
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 47 Bach Jr BR. Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Arthroscopy 2003; 19 (10) (Suppl. 01) 14-29
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 48 White LM, Kramer J, Recht MP. MR imaging evaluation of the postoperative knee: ligaments, menisci, and articular cartilage. Skeletal Radiol 2005; 34 (08) 431-452
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 49 Naraghi AM, Gupta S, Jacks LM, Essue J, Marks P, White LM. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MR imaging signs of anterior knee laxity in the presence of an intact graft. Radiology 2012; 263 (03) 802-810
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 50 Gohil S, Falconer TM, Breidahl W, Annear PO. Serial MRI and clinical assessment of cyclops lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (05) 1090-1096
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 51 Muellner T, Kdolsky R, Grossschmidt K, Schabus R, Kwasny O, Plenk Jr H. Cyclops and cyclopoid formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical and histomorphological differences. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1999; 7 (05) 284-289
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 52 Simpfendorfer C, Miniaci A, Subhas N, Winalski CS, Ilaslan H. Pseudocyclops: two cases of ACL graft partial tears mimicking cyclops lesions on MRI. Skeletal Radiol 2015; 44 (08) 1169-1173
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 53 Ekhtiari S, Horner NS, de Sa D. , et al. Arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction is best treated in a step-wise approach with early recognition and intervention: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (12) 3929-3937
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 54 Orsi AD, Canavan PK, Vaziri A, Goebel R, Kapasi OA, Nayeb-Hashemi H. The effects of graft size and insertion site location during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on intercondylar notch impingement. Knee 2017; 24 (03) 525-535
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 55 Seeger LL, Sako E, Motamedi K, Levine BD, Hame SL. Intra-articular calcifications following arthroscopic ACL reconstruction: prevalence and possible significance. Skeletal Radiol 2014; 43 (02) 209-212
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 56 Ghazikhanian V, Beltran J, Nikac V, Feldman M, Bencardino JT. Tibial tunnel and pretibial cysts following ACL graft reconstruction: MR imaging diagnosis. Skeletal Radiol 2012; 41 (11) 1375-1379
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 57 Weber AE, Delos D, Oltean HN. , et al. Tibial and femoral tunnel changes after ACL reconstruction: a prospective 2-year longitudinal MRI study. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (05) 1147-1156
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 58 Emond CE, Woelber EB, Kurd SK, Ciccotti MG, Cohen SB. A comparison of the results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bioabsorbable versus metal interference screws: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (06) 572-580
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 59 Pereira H, Correlo VM, Silva-Correia J, Oliveira JM, Reis RL, Espregueira-Mendes J. Migration of “bioabsorbable” screws in ACL repair. How much do we know? A systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (04) 986-994
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 60 Studler U, White LM, Naraghi AM. , et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by using bioabsorbable femoral cross pins: MR imaging findings at follow-up and comparison with clinical findings. Radiology 2010; 255 (01) 108-116
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 61 Mae T, Kuroda S, Matsumoto N. , et al. Migration of EndoButton after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2011; 27 (11) 1528-1535
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 62 Tuite MJ, De Smet AA. MR of the postoperative knee. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 8 (01) 2-14
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 63 Paulos LE, Wnorowski DC, Greenwald AE. Infrapatellar contracture syndrome. Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term followup. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (04) 440-449
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 64 Stein DA, Hunt SA, Rosen JE, Sherman OH. The incidence and outcome of patella fractures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (06) 578-583
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 65 Tay GH, Warrier SK, Marquis G. Indirect patella fractures following ACL reconstruction: a review. Acta Orthop 2006; 77 (03) 494-500
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 66 Hardy A, Casabianca L, Andrieu K, Baverel L, Noailles T. ; Junior French Arthroscopy Society. Complications following harvesting of patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review of literature. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017; 103 (8S): S245-S248
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 67 Seon JK, Song EK, Park SJ. Osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. Am J Sports Med 2006; 29: 450-456
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar