Reconstruction of Knee Defects Using Pedicled Gastrocnemius Muscle Flap with Split-Thickness Skin Grafting: A Single Surgeon's Experience with 21 Patients

Ali Kilic; Brad Denney; Jorge de la Torre

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1653965

The Journal of Knee Surgery, Inhaltsverzeichnis

J Knee Surg 2019; 32(05): 463-467
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1653965

Original Article

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Reconstruction of Knee Defects Using Pedicled Gastrocnemius Muscle Flap with Split-Thickness Skin Grafting: A Single Surgeon's Experience with 21 Patients

Ali Kilic

¹Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

,

Brad Denney

¹Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

,

Jorge de la Torre

¹Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Generally, reconstruction of knee defects with exposed bone, joint, tendon, and/or hardware requires a vascularized muscle flap for coverage. Although there are several surgical options for a knee defect reconstruction, the pedicled gastrocnemius muscle still remains the workhorse flap. Although this flap is commonly used for knee defect reconstruction and the technique is described very well, there is an absence of information in the literature detailing the technique of harvesting and insetting of the gastrocnemius flap step by step with illustrations. The purpose of this article is to describe in detail the technique to reconstruct defects of the knee with pedicled gastrocnemius muscle flap as well as to present demographics and surgical results of 21 patients who had knee reconstruction with a pedicled gastrocnemius muscle flap and split-thickness skin grafting.

Keywords

gastrocnemius flap - knee defects - periprosthetic infection

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466 (07) 1710-1715
2 Galat DD, McGovern SC, Larson DR, Harrington JR, Hanssen AD, Clarke HD. Surgical treatment of early wound complications following primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (01) 48-54
3 Kubista B, Hartzler RU, Wood CM, Osmon DR, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG. Reinfection after two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection of total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2012; 36 (01) 65-71
4 Corten K, Struelens B, Evans B, Graham E, Bourne RB, MacDonald SJ. Gastrocnemius flap reconstruction of soft-tissue defects following infected total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (09) 1217-1221
5 Gravvanis A, Kyriakopoulos A, Kateros K, Tsoutsos D. Flap reconstruction of the knee: a review of current concepts and a proposed algorithm. World J Orthop 2014; 5 (05) 603-613
6 Choi K, Cho J, Park M, Park DH, Lee IJ. Knee and ankle reconstruction with reverse anterolateral thigh and free anterolateral thigh flap from one donor site. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2016; 15 (03) 267-270
7 Kim JY, Khavanin N, Rambachan A. , et al. Surgical duration and risk of venous thromboembolism. JAMA Surg 2015; 150 (02) 110-117