The Role of a Decision Rule in Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism Patients with a Non-high Probability Ventilation-perfusion Scan

Summary

Background: In order to improve the use of information contained in the medical history and physical examination in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and a non-high probability ventilation-perfusion scan, we assessed whether a simple, quantitative decision rule could be derived for the diagnosis or exclusion of pulmonary embolism. Methods: In 140 consecutive symptomatic patients with a non- high probability ventilation-perfusion scan and an interpretable pulmonary angiogram, various clinical and lung scan items were collected prospectively and analyzed by multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify the most informative combination of items. Results: The prevalence of proven pulmonary embolism in the patient population was 27.1%. A decision rule containing the presence of wheezing, previous deep venous thrombosis, recently developed or worsened cough, body temperature above 37° C and multiple defects on the perfusion scan was constructed. For the rule the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve was larger than that of the prior probability of pulmonary embolism as assessed by the physician at presentation (0.76 versus 0.59; p = 0.0097). At the cut-off point with the maximal positive predictive value 2% of the patients scored positive, at the cut-off point with the maximal negative predictive value pulmonary embolism could be excluded in 16% of the patients. Conclusions: We derived a simple decision rule containing 5 easily interpretable variables for the patient population specified. The optimal use of the rule appears to be in the exclusion of pulmonary embolism. Prospective validation of this rule is indicated to confirm its clinical utility.

• References

• 1 van BeekEJR, Tiel-van BüulMMC, Btiller HR, van RoyenEA, ten CateJW. The value of lung scintigraphy in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Eur J of Nucl Med 1993; 20: 173-181
• 2 Stein PD, Hull RD, Saltzman HA, Pineo G. Strategy for diagnosis of patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 1993; 103: 1553-1559
• 3 Perrier A, Bounameaux H, Morabia A, de MoerlooseP, Slosman D, Unger P, Junod A. Contribution of D-dimer plasma measurement and lower-limb venous ultrasound to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a decision analysis model. Am Heart Journal 1994; 127: 624-635
• 4 Hull RD, Raskob GE, Ginsberg JS, Panju AA, Brill-Edwards P, Coates G, Pineo GF. A noninvasive strategy for the treatment of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 289-297
• 5 Stein PD, Henry JW, Gottschalk A. The addition of clinical assessment to stratification according to prior cardiopulmonary disease further optimizes the interpretation of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in pulmonary embolism. Chest 1993; 104: 1472-1476
• 6 Wigton RS, Hoellerich VL, Patil KD. How physicians use clinical information in diagnosing pulmonary embolism: an application of conjoint analysis. Med Decis Making 1986; 06 (01) 02-11
• 7 Petruzzelli S, Palla A, Citi M, Giuntini C. Improvement of screening for pulmonary embolism with a standardized questionnaire. Respiration 1990; 57: 329-337
• 8 Celi A, Palla A, Petruzzelli S, Carrozzi L, Jacobson A, Celia G, Giuntini C, Sasahara AA. Prospective study of a standardized questionnaire to improve clinical estimate of pulmonary embolism. Chest 1989; 95: 332-337
• 9 Hoellerich VL, Wigton RS. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism using clinical findings. Arch Intern Med 1986; 146: 1699-1704
• 10 Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839-843
• 11 Patil S, Henry JW, Rubenfire M, Stein PD. Neural network in the clinical diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 1993; 104: 1685-1689
• 12 Wyatt J. Nervous about artificial neural networks?. Lancet 1995; 346: 1175-1177