Morphology of the Left Atrial Appendage: Prevalence and Gender Difference in a Kenyan Population

Abstract

Introduction The left atrial appendage is the site of origin of thrombi in 90% of cardioembolic stroke. Although literature reports a higher risk of cardioembolic stroke among blacks and females, it is unclear whether this is due to preponderance of specific left atrial appendage morphologies in these groups since there is paucity of data. This study describes the left atrial appendage morphology in a Black Kenyan population and assesses for existence of gender differences.

Materials and Methods Ninety one (91) human hearts (50 male and 41 female) were obtained from autopsy specimens after ethical approval. The morphological types of the left atrial appendage were determined and classified as cauliflower, Windsock, Chickenwing and cactus. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences. The frequencies of the morphological types was determined and Chi square applied to check for gender differences. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant at 95% confidence interval.

Results and Conclusion There were 27 cauliflower (29.7%), 26 Windsock (28.6%), 25 Chickenwing (27.4%) and 9 cactus (14.3%) morphological types of left atrial appendage. Cauliflower and cactus types were more prevalent in males, while Windsock and Chickenwing types were more prevalent in females (p = 0.537). There are no statistically significant gender differences in the left atrial appendage morphology types in this sample black Kenyan population. The higher frequency of both the risky cauliflower and the protective Chickenwing morphologies warrants assessment of left atrial appendage morphological types in management of high risk cardioembolic stroke patients in this setting.

Keywords

left atrial appendage - gender - blacks

• References

• 1 Standring S. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 40th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2008: 1019-1020
• 2 Kimura T, Takatsuki S, Inagawa K. , et al. Anatomical characteristics of the left atrial appendage in cardiogenic stroke with low CHADS2 scores. Heart Rhythm 2013; 10 (06) 921-925
• 3 Wang Y, Di Biase L, Horton RP, Nguyen T, Morhanty P, Natale A. Left atrial appendage studied by computed tomography to help planning for appendage closure device placement. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010; 21 (09) 973-982
• 4 Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Anselmino M. , et al. Does the left atrial appendage morphology correlate with the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation? Results from a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60 (06) 531-538
• 5 Korhonen M, Muuronen A, Arponen O. , et al. Left atrial appendage morphology in patients with suspected cardiogenic stroke without known atrial fibrillation. PLoS One 2015; 10 (03) e0118822
• 6 Fukushima K, Fukushima N, Kato K. , et al. Correlation between left atrial appendage morphology and flow velocity in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016; 17 (01) 59-66
• 7 Makino N, Nishino M, Ishiyama A. , et al. Left atrial appendage morphologic pattern determined by computed tomography is a novel predictor of high risk patient for embolism with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61 (Suppl. 10) E272 Doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(13)60272-7
• 8 Yamamoto M, Seo Y, Kawamatsu N. , et al. Complex left atrial appendage morphology and left atrial appendage thrombus formation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7 (02) 337-343
• 9 Fang MC, Singer DE, Chang Y. , et al. Gender differences in the risk of ischemic stroke and peripheral embolism in atrial fibrillation: the AnTicoagulation and Risk factors In Atrial fibrillation (ATRIA) study. Circulation 2005; 112 (12) 1687-1691
• 10 White H, Boden-Albala B, Wang C. , et al. Ischemic stroke subtype incidence among whites, blacks, and Hispanics: the Northern Manhattan Study. Circulation 2005; 111 (10) 1327-1331
• 11 Blackshear JL, Odell JA. Appendage obliteration to reduce stroke in cardiac surgical patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61 (02) 755-759
• 12 Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K. , et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation 2014; 129 (08) 837-847
• 13 Hernandez MB, Asher CR, Hernandez AV, Novaro GM. African american race and prevalence of atrial fibrillation:a meta-analysis. Cardiol Res Pract 2012; 2012: 275624
• 14 Üçerler H, İkiz ZA, Özgür T. Human left atrial appendage anatomy and overview of its clinical significance. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2013; 13 (06) 566-572
• 15 De Backer O, Arnous S, Ihlemann N. , et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an update. Open Heart 2014; 1 (01) e000020
• 16 Kosiuk J, Nedios S, Kornej J. , et al. Impact of left atrial appendage morphology on peri-interventional thromboembolic risk during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2014; 11 (09) 1522-1527
• 17 Appelros P, Stegmayr B, Terént A. Sex differences in stroke epidemiology: a systematic review. Stroke 2009; 40 (04) 1082-1090