Common Topics of Publication and Levels of Evidence in the Current Hand Surgery Literature

Abstract

Background Scientific publications are the primary vehicle for the distribution of scientific findings, but there has been limited research on literature topic surveillance. We sought to identify and characterize the most commonly published topic domains in the hand surgery literature.

Methods We performed a 6-month hypothesis testing phase to identify the most frequently published topics in three hand surgery journals: Hand, The Journal of Hand Surgery (American), and The Journal of Hand Surgery (European). We reviewed all of the published articles in these journals from June 2010 to May 2015 to identify and characterize publications related to the three most common topic domains.

Results A total of 2,146 articles were published during the 5-year study period. The three most frequent topics domains included distal radius (DR) (11% of all articles), flexor tendon (FT) (9%), and carpal tunnel (CT) (7.5%). These subjects accounted for a total of 584 articles (27% of all publications) and 3,014 published pages during the study period. FT, CT, and DR publications were cited on average 2.3 times per year (2.5, 2.4, and 2.0, respectively).

Conclusion A small subset of topic domains makes up a significant proportion of scientific publications in hand surgery.

Keywords

publication frequency - level of evidence - publication bias - citation analysis

• References

• 1 Stross JK, Harlan WR. The dissemination of new medical information. JAMA 1979; 241 (24) 2622-2624
• 2 Alper BS, Hand JA, Elliott SG. et al. How much effort is needed to keep up with the literature relevant for primary care?. J Med Libr Assoc 2004; 92 (04) 429-437
• 3 Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Fitzgerald D, Guyatt GH, Walker CJ, Sackett DL. How to keep up with the medical literature: I. Why try to keep up and how to get started. Ann Intern Med 1986; 105 (01) 149-153
• 4 Survey: How Doctors Read and What It Means to Patients/Business Wire. 2014 Available at: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20140722005535/en/Survey-Doctors-Read-Means-Patients Accessed October 2, 2017
• 5 Callaham M, Wears RL, Weber E. Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA 2002; 287 (21) 2847-2850
• 6 Ho RC, Mak KK, Tao R, Lu Y, Day JR, Pan F. Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13: 74
• 7 Resnik DB, Elmore SA. Ensuring the quality, fairness, and integrity of journal peer review: a possible role of editors. Sci Eng Ethics 2016; 22 (01) 169-188
• 8 Stahel PF, Moore EE. Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system. BMC Med 2014; 12: 179
• 9 Patel J. Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials. BMC Med 2014; 12: 128
• 10 van Lent M, Overbeke J, Out HJ. Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journals. PLoS One 2014; 9 (08) e104846
• 11 Sugrue CM, Joyce CW, Sugrue RM, Carroll SM. Trends in the level of evidence in clinical hand surgery research. Hand (NY) 2016; 11 (02) 211-215
• 12 Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P. et al The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence. Oxford Centre Evidence-Based Medicine. Vol. 1; 2011 Available at: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025
• 13 Ahn CS, Li RJ, Ahn BS, Kuo P, Bryant J, Day CS. Hand and wrist research productivity in journals with high impact factors: a 20 year analysis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37 (03) 275-283
• 14 Ootes D, Lambers KT, Ring DC. The epidemiology of upper extremity injuries presenting to the emergency department in the United States. Hand (NY) 2012; 7 (01) 18-22
• 15 Wildin C, Dias JJ, Heras-Palou C, Bradley MJ, Burke FD. Trends in elective hand surgery referrals from primary care. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88 (06) 543-546
• 16 Thoma A, Veltri K, Haines T, Duku E. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompression. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (05) 1137-1146
• 17 Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26 (05) 908-915
• 18 Hill C, Riaz M, Mozzam A, Brennen MD. A regional audit of hand and wrist injuries. A study of 4873 injuries. J Hand Surg [Br] 1998; 23 (02) 196-200
• 19 Eberlin KR, Labow BI, Upton III J, Taghinia AH. High-impact articles in hand surgery. Hand (NY) 2012; 7 (02) 157-162
• 20 Rosales RS, Reboso-Morales L, Martin-Hidalgo Y, Diez de la Lastra-BoschI. Level of evidence in hand surgery. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5 (01) 665
• 21 Chung KC, Burns PB, Sears ED. Outcomes research in hand surgery: where have we been and where should we go?. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31 (08) 1373-1379