PDF herunterladen
J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35(02): 156-162
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1668142
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Use of Vascularized Fibular Free Flap in the Reconstruction of the Femur in Pediatric and Adolescent Bone Sarcomas: Complications and Functional Outcome

Ahmed Mohamed el Ghoneimy
1   Department of Orthopedic, Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
,
Magdy El Sherbiny
1   Department of Orthopedic, Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
,
Nehal Kamal
1   Department of Orthopedic, Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

05. November 2017

27. Juni 2018

Publikationsdatum:
18. August 2018 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Most reports on skeletal reconstruction using vascularized fibular free flap include patients with varying age groups and anatomic locations. This study has limited the inclusion criteria to pediatric and adolescent patients diagnosed with bone sarcoma of the femoral shaft.

Methods Forty-one patients, diagnosed with a malignant bone tumor of the femoral shaft (21 Ewing's sarcomas and 20 osteosarcomas), were locally treated by joint sparing wide resection and reconstruction using a vascularized fibular free flap. All clinical and radiographic data were reviewed for graft healing and hypertrophy as well as oncologic and functional outcome.

Results The mean follow-up period was 48.7 months (12–104 months). The mean age at presentation was 10.3 years (5–17 years). The average length of the resected femoral shaft was 19.2 cm (15–24 cm) and the average length of the harvested fibula was 17.4 cm (15–21 cm). The mean time to union was 4.8 months (1–6 months) and the mean hypertrophy index was 78% (15.5–184%). Complications included 12 fractures (33.3%), 5 non-unions (13.8%), and 5 failures of graft hypertrophy (13.8%). At the latest clinical evaluation, the mean MSTS score was 81% (56–100%) and the mean limb length inequality was 4.75 cm (3–11 cm).

Conclusion Despite the high functional demand and deleterious effect of chemotherapy on bone healing, reconstruction of the femur by vascularized fibular free flap in pediatric bone sarcomas can lead to a good functional outcome. Complications, such as fracture and non-union, can be successfully treated by revision of fixation and autologous iliac crest grafting.

Level of Evidence IV.

Keywords

bone sarcoma - vascularized fibular free flap - femur - reconstruction - functional outcome
 

  • References

  • 1 Taylor GI, Miller GD, Ham FJ. The free vascularized bone graft. A clinical extension of microvascular techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 55 (05) 533-544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Fuchs B, Ossendorf C, Leerapun T, Sim FH. Intercalary segmental reconstruction after bone tumor resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008; 34 (12) 1271-1276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 De Boer HH, Wood MB. Bone changes in vascularized fibular graft. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989; 71 (03) 374–378
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Arai K, Toh S, Tsubo K, Nishikawa S, Narita S, Miura H. Complications of vascularized fibula graft for reconstruction of long bones. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (07) 2301-2306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ceruso M, Taddei F, Bigazzi P, Manfrini M. Vascularised fibula graft inlaid in a massive bone allograft: considerations on the bio-mechanical behaviour of the combined graft in segmental bone reconstructions after sarcoma resection. Injury 2008; 39 (Suppl. 03) S68-S74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Capanna R, Bufalini C, Campanacci M. A new technique for reconstruction of large metadiaphyseal bone defects: a combined graft (allograft shell plus vascularized fibula). Orthop Traumatol 1993; 2 (03) 159-177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (286) 241-246
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Eward WC, Kontogeorgakos V, Levin LS, Brigman BE. Free vascularized fibular graft reconstruction of large skeletal defects after tumor resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (02) 590-598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Chen CM, Disa JJ, Lee HY. , et al. Reconstruction of extremity long bone defects after sarcoma resection with vascularized fibula flaps: a 10-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (03) 915-924 , discussion 925–926
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gebert C, Hillmann A, Schwappach A. , et al. Free vascularized fibular grafting for reconstruction after tumor resection in the upper extremity. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94 (02) 114-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rose PS, Shin AY, Bishop AT, Moran SL, Sim FH. Vascularized free fibula transfer for oncologic reconstruction of the humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 438 (438) 80-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Zaretski A, Amir A, Meller I. , et al. Free fibula long bone reconstruction in orthopedic oncology: a surgical algorithm for reconstructive options. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (07) 1989-2000
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kasashima T, Minami A, Kutsumi K. Late fracture of vascularized fibular grafts. Microsurgery 1998; 18 (05) 337-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 de Boer HH, Wood MB, Hermans J. Reconstruction of large skeletal defects by vascularized fibula transfer. Factors that influenced the outcome of union in 62 cases. Int Orthop 1990; 14 (02) 121-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Minami A, Kasashima T, Iwasaki N, Kato H, Kaneda K. Vascularised fibular grafts. An experience of 102 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82 (07) 1022-1025
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ceruso M, Taddei F, Bigazzi P, Manfrini M. Vascularised fibula graft inlaid in a massive bone allograft: Considerations on the bio-mechanical behavior of the combined graft in segmental bone reconstructions after sarcoma resection. Injury 2008; 39 (Suppl. 03) S68-S74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Li J, Wang Z, Guo Z, Chen GJ, Fu J, Pei GX. The use of allograft shell with intramedullary vascularized fibula graft for intercalary reconstruction after diaphyseal resection for lower extremity bony malignancy. J Surg Oncol 2010; 102 (05) 368-374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Jager T, Journeau P, Dautel G, Barbary S, Haumont T, Lascombes P. Is combining massive bone allograft with free vascularized fibular flap the children's reconstruction answer to lower limb defects following bone tumour resection?. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96 (04) 340-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Houdek MT, Wagner ER, Stans AA. , et al. What is the outcome of allograft and intramedullary free fibula (Capanna Technique) in pediatric and adolescent patients with bone tumors?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474(3): 660-668
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Belt PJ, Dickinson IC, Theile DRB. Vascularised free fibular flap in bone resection and reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 2005; 58 (04) 425-430
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Chang DW, Weber KL. Use of a vascularized fibula bone flap and intercalary allograft for diaphyseal reconstruction after resection of primary extremity bone sarcomas. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116 (07) 1918-1925
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Groundland JS, Ambler SB, Houskamp DJ, Orriola JJ, Binitie OT, Letson GD. Surgical and functional outcomes after limb-preservation surgery for tumor in pediatric patients. A systematic review. JBJS Rev 2016; 4 (02) e2 . doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.O.00013
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Estrella EP, Wang EH. A comparison of vascularized free fibular flaps and nonvascularized fibular grafts for reconstruction of long bone defects after tumor resection. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (03) 194-205
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar