Indications and Safety of the Zygomatic Osteotomy in Middle Cranial Fossa Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Review

Abstract

Background Zygomatic osteotomy, an adjunct to middle cranial fossa (MCF) surgical approaches, improves the superior-inferior angle of approach and minimizes temporal lobe retraction. However, a decision-making algorithm for selective use of the zygomatic osteotomy and the impact of the zygomatic osteotomy on surgical complications have not been well documented.

Objective We described an algorithm for deciding whether to use a zygomatic osteotomy in MCF surgery and evaluated complications associated with a zygomatic osteotomy.

Methods A retrospective review of MCF cases over 11 years at our academic tertiary referral center was conducted. Demographic variables, tumor characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative complications were extracted.

Results Of the 87 patients included, 15 (17%) received a zygomatic osteotomy. Surgical trajectory oriented from anterior to posterior (A-P) was significantly correlated with the use of the zygomatic osteotomy. Among the cases approached from A-P, we found (receiver-operating characteristic curve) that the cut-off tumor size that predicted a zygomatic osteotomy was 30 mm. Of the 87 cases included, 15 patients had a complication. The multivariate logistic regression model failed to reveal any significant correlation between complications and zygomatic osteotomies.

Conclusions We found that the most important factor determining the use of a zygomatic osteotomy was anticipated trajectory. A-P approaches were most highly correlated with zygomatic osteotomy. Within those cases, a lesion size cut-off of 30 mm was the secondary predicting factor of zygomatic osteotomy use. The odds of suffering a surgical complication were not significantly increased by use of zygomatic osteotomy.

Keywords

zygomatic osteotomy - middle cranial fossa - skull base - surgical approaches - surgical adjuncts

Note

Previous Presentations: This study has been presented in part at the North American Skull Base Society 28^th annual meeting, February 14–15, 2018, Coronado, CA, United States.

Financial Support

Not applicable.

• References

• 1 Chotai S, Kshettry VR, Petrak A, Ammirati M. Lateral transzygomatic middle fossa approach and its extensions: surgical technique and 3D anatomy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015; 130: 33-41
• 2 Van Gompel JJ, Alikhani P, Youssef AS, Loveren HR, Boyev KP, Agazzi S. Anterior petrosectomy: consecutive series of 46 patients with attention to approach-related complications. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76 (05) 379-384
• 3 Dolenc VV. A combined epi- and subdural direct approach to carotid-ophthalmic artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1985; 62 (05) 667-672
• 4 al-Mefty O, Anand VK. Zygomatic approach to skull-base lesions. J Neurosurg 1990; 73 (05) 668-673
• 5 Cushing H. Landmark article April 28, 1900: a method of total extirpation of the Gasserian ganglion for trigeminal neuralgia. By a route through the temporal fossa and beneath the middle meningeal artery. By Harvey Cushing. JAMA 1983; 250 (04) 519-528
• 6 Ammirati M, Ma J, Becker D, Black K, Cheatham M, Bloch J. Transzygomatic approach to the tentorial incisura: surgical anatomy. Skull Base Surg 1992; 2 (03) 161-166
• 7 Campero A, Campero AA, Socolovsky M. , et al. The transzygomatic approach. J Clin Neurosci 2010; 17 (11) 1428-1433
• 8 Melamed I, Tubbs RS, Payner TD, Cohen-Gadol AA. Trans-zygomatic middle cranial fossa approach to access lesions around the cavernous sinus and anterior parahippocampus: a minimally invasive skull base approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009; 151 (08) 977-982 , discussion 982
• 9 Wong RH, De Los Reyes K, Alikhani P. , et al. The subtemporal approach to retroinfundibular craniopharyngiomas: a new look at an old approach. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2015; 11 (04) 495-503
• 10 Honeybul S, Neil-Dwyer G, Lang DA, Evans BT, Lees PD. The transzygomatic approach: a long-term clinical review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1995; 136 (3-4): 111-116
• 11 Uttley D, Archer DJ, Marsh HT, Bell BA. Improved access to lesions of the central skull base by mobilization of the zygoma: experience with 54 cases. Neurosurgery 1991; 28 (01) 99-103 , discussion 103–104
• 12 Dayoub H, Schueler WB, Shakir H, Kimmell KT, Sincoff EH. The relationship between the zygomatic arch and the floor of the middle cranial fossa: a radiographic study. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (6, Suppl Operative) 363-369
• 13 Ercan S, Scerrati A, Wu P, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Is less always better? Keyhole and standard subtemporal approaches: evaluation of temporal lobe retraction and surgical volume with and without zygomatic osteotomy in a cadaveric model. J Neurosurg 2017; 127 (01) 157-164
• 14 Schwartz MS, Anderson GJ, Horgan MA, Kellogg JX, McMenomey SO, Delashaw Jr JB. Quantification of increased exposure resulting from orbital rim and orbitozygomatic osteotomy via the frontotemporal transsylvian approach. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (06) 1020-1026
• 15 Honeybul S, Neil-Dwyer G, Evans BT, Lang DA. The transzygomatic approach: an anatomical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 35 (05) 334-340
• 16 Ivan ME, Cheng JS, Kaur G. , et al. Association of morbidity with extent of resection and cavernous sinus invasion in sphenoid wing meningiomas. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2012; 73 (01) 76-83