Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2018; 03(02): e46-e49
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1668561
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Miniaturized Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy for Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites

Stuart L. Mitchell
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Edward Ray
2   Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
,
Peter G. Cordeiro
2   Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
› Institutsangaben

Funding This research was funded, in part, through the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (NIH/NCI) Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

14. Februar 2018

18. Juni 2018

Publikationsdatum:
24. August 2018 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Background Multiple therapeutic options exist for the treatment of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites, but there is no clear consensus among surgeons about the best option. Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has rapidly gained in popularity since its invention. Recently, several miniaturized, single-patient NPWT (SP-NPWT) devices have become available. Compared with traditional NPWT devices, SP-NPWT devices are associated with equal wound healing capability and reliability, but offer several advantages. We present a series of 10 consecutive patients whose STSG donor sites were treated with a commercially available SP-NPWT device.

Methods We performed a retrospective review for 10 consecutive patients who underwent STSG procedures and were treated with SP-NPWT devices.

Results From 2015 to 2017, 10 consecutive patients underwent oncologic reconstruction using STSG and had their donor sites treated with SP-NPWT devices. The SP-NPWT dressing had been left in place for 2 weeks after surgery. The average donor site area measured 80 cm2 (range: 76–106 cm2). In all 10 patients, the donor sites healed uneventfully and with no complications.

Conclusion Off-the-shelf, miniaturized, SP-NPWT systems appear to be at least as effective as traditional dressings for STSG donor sites and require no maintenance (skilled nursing or dressing changes). Compared with larger and less portable standard NPWT devices, SP-NPWT dressing systems provide a potential cost benefit as well as enhanced convenience and portability.