Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2019; 32(08): 812-819
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669787
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Treatments of Choice for Isolated, Full-Thickness Tears of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Nationwide Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Adam Schumaier
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Chelsea Minoughan
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Andrew Jimenez
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Brian Grawe
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

07 November 2017

23 July 2018

Publication Date:
11 September 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The ideal treatment for isolated, full-thickness tears of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to determine how the majority of orthopaedic surgeons treat isolated, full-thickness tears of the PCL. In July 2017, a 17-question multiple-choice survey regarding the treatment of isolated, full-thickness tears of the PCL was emailed to 3,500 orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons with membership in the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine. Responders answered multiple-choice questions related to indications, technique, graft choice, bracing, and weight-bearing status following reconstruction. Answer choices were then analyzed against surgeon-specific variables. The survey was completed by 663 orthopaedic surgeons. Of the responders, 93% were fellowship trained in sports medicine with an average practice duration of 13 years. The total number of PCLs reconstructed per surgeon was low, 11.6. On average, surgeons estimate they reconstruct the PCL in only 22% of patients with full-thickness tears. The two most common surgical indications were functional limitations and failure of physical therapy. The reconstruction of choice involves a transtibial approach (63%) with a single bundle (87%) allograft (83%) of the Achilles tendon (51%). The postoperative brace is typically locked in extension (66%), and weight-bearing is delayed for 3.8 weeks. Of the surgeons with the fewest years of experience, 39% use all-inside, 89% use allograft, and 24% use dynamic bracing. Compared with surgeons with the most years of experience, only 16% use all-inside (p < 0.01), 57% use allograft (p < 0.01), and 11% use dynamic bracing (p = 0.01). Isolated, full-thickness tears of the PCL are rare injuries that are infrequently reconstructed. The most common indications for reconstruction are functional limitations and failure of conservative management. Most surgeons' treatment of choice for reconstruction involves a transtibial approach with a single bundle Achilles allograft and a postoperative brace locked in extension. On average, weight-bearing is prolonged for 3.8 weeks. The all-inside technique, allograft, and dynamic bracing are becoming more popular.

Keywords

posterior cruciate ligament - multiligamentous injury - transtibial - all-inside - single bundle - double bundle

Supplementary Material

 

  • References

  • 1 Fanelli GC, Beck JD, Edson CJ. Current concepts review: the posterior cruciate ligament. J Knee Surg 2010; 23 (02) 61-72
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Chen G, Fu WL, Tang X, Li Q, Li J. Clinical epidemiological analysis on posterior cruciate ligament injuries [in Chinese]. Zhongguo Gu Shang 2015; 28 (07) 638-642
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Swenson DM, Collins CL, Best TM, Flanigan DC, Fields SK, Comstock RD. Epidemiology of knee injuries among U.S. high school athletes, 2005/2006-2010/2011. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013; 45 (03) 462-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bedi A, Musahl V, Cowan JB. Management of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: an evidence-based review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016; 24 (05) 277-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fowler PJ, Messieh SS. Isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes. Am J Sports Med 1987; 15 (06) 553-557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Jacobi M, Reischl N, Wahl P, Gautier E, Jakob RP. Acute isolated injury of the posterior cruciate ligament treated by a dynamic anterior drawer brace: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92 (10) 1381-1384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Shelbourne KD, Clark M, Gray T. Minimum 10-year follow-up of patients after an acute, isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury treated nonoperatively. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (07) 1526-1533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Anderson CJ, Ziegler CG, Wijdicks CA, Engebretsen L, LaPrade RF. Arthroscopically pertinent anatomy of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (21) 1936-1945
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ahmad CS, Cohen ZA, Levine WN, Gardner TR, Ateshian GA, Mow VC. Codominance of the individual posterior cruciate ligament bundles. An analysis of bundle lengths and orientation. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31 (02) 221-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kennedy NI, Wijdicks CA, Goldsmith MT. , et al. Kinematic analysis of the posterior cruciate ligament, part 1: the individual and collective function of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (12) 2828-2838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Harner CD, Janaushek MA, Kanamori A, Yagi M, Vogrin TM, Woo SL. Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (02) 144-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 LaPrade CM, Civitarese DM, Rasmussen MT, LaPrade RF. Emerging updates on the posterior cruciate ligament: a review of the current literature. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (12) 3077-3092
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gill TJ, DeFrate LE, Wang C. , et al. The effect of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on patellofemoral contact pressures in the knee joint under simulated muscle loads. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (01) 109-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Keller PM, Shelbourne KD, McCarroll JR, Rettig AC. Nonoperatively treated isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21 (01) 132-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kozanek M, Fu EC, Van de Velde SK, Gill TJ, Li G. Posterolateral structures of the knee in posterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (03) 534-541
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Logan M, Williams A, Lavelle J, Gedroyc W, Freeman M. The effect of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency on knee kinematics. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (08) 1915-1922
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Patel DV, Allen AA, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Simonian PT. The nonoperative treatment of acute, isolated (partial or complete) posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: an intermediate-term follow-up study. HSS J 2007; 3 (02) 137-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wydra FB, York PJ, Johnson CR, Silvestri L. Allografts for ligament reconstruction: where are we now?. Am J Orthop 2016; 45 (07) 446-452
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Levy BA, Fanelli GC, Miller MD, Stuart MJ. Advances in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 2015; 64: 543-554
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bethell C, Fiorillo J, Lansky D, Hendryx M, Knickman J. Online consumer surveys as a methodology for assessing the quality of the United States health care system. J Med Internet Res 2004; 6 (01) e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Niu E, Yang A, Harris AHS, Bishop J. Which fixation device is preferred for surgical treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in the United States? A survey of orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (11) 3647-3655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Obremskey W, Molina C, Collinge C. , et al; Evidence-Based Quality Value and Safety CommitteeOrthopaedic Trauma Association, Writing Committee. Current practice in the management of open fractures among orthopaedic trauma surgeons. Part A: initial management. A survey of orthopaedic trauma surgeons. J Orthop Trauma 2014; 28 (08) e198 –e202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont 9400, West Higgins Road, Fax: 847.823.8125 I 60018 P 847 823 7186. AAOS Orthopaedic Census 2016 . Available at: https://www.aaos.org/2016censusreport/?ssopc=1 . Accessed May 25, 2018
    PubMed
  • 24 Fanelli GC. Posterior cruciate ligament injuries in trauma patients. Arthroscopy 1993; 9 (03) 291-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Fanelli GC, Edson CJ. Posterior cruciate ligament injuries in trauma patients: part II. Arthroscopy 1995; 11 (05) 526-529
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 McGuire DA, Hendricks SD. Protection of posterior structures during transtibial tunnel creation for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (11) 1254-1255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Apsingi S, Bull AMJ, Deehan DJ, Amis AA. Review: femoral tunnel placement for PCL reconstruction in relation to the PCL fibre bundle attachments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (06) 652-659
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Nicodeme J-D, Löcherbach C, Jolles BM. Tibial tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (07) 1556-1562
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Difelice GS, Lissy M, Haynes P. Surgical technique: when to arthroscopically repair the torn posterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (03) 861-868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Richter M, Bosch U, Wippermann B, Hofmann A, Krettek C. Comparison of surgical repair or reconstruction of the cruciate ligaments versus nonsurgical treatment in patients with traumatic knee dislocations. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (05) 718-727
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Parolie JM, Bergfeld JA. Long-term results of nonoperative treatment of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 1986; 14 (01) 35-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Hewett TE, Noyes FR, Lee MD. Diagnosis of complete and partial posterior cruciate ligament ruptures. Stress radiography compared with KT-1000 arthrometer and posterior drawer testing. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25 (05) 648-655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Jung TM, Reinhardt C, Scheffler SU, Weiler A. Stress radiography to measure posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a comparison of five different techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (11) 1116-1121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Margheritini F, Mariani PP. Diagnostic evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003; 11 (05) 282-288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Stäubli HU, Jakob RP. Posterior instability of the knee near extension. A clinical and stress radiographic analysis of acute injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72 (02) 225-230
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Berg EE. Posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1995; 11 (01) 69-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Cooper DE, Stewart D. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (02) 346-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Ahn JH, Yoo JC, Wang JH. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: double-loop hamstring tendon autograft versus Achilles tendon allograft--clinical results of a minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (08) 965-969
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Tian P, Hu W-Q, Li Z-J, Sun X-L, Ma X-L. Comparison of autograft and allograft tendons in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96 (27) e7434
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Wang C-J, Chan Y-S, Weng L-H, Yuan L-J, Chen H-S. Comparison of autogenous and allogenous posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions of the knee. Injury 2004; 35 (12) 1279-1285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Desai N, Björnsson H, Musahl V. , et al. Anatomic single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (05) 1009-1023
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Zhao JX, Zhang LH, Mao Z. , et al. Outcome of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the single- versus double bundle technique: a meta-analysis. J Int Med Res 2015; 43 (02) 149-160
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Qi Y-S, Wang H-J, Wang S-J, Zhang Z-Z, Huang A-B, Yu J-K. A systematic review of double-bundle versus single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17: 45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Montgomery SR, Johnson JS, McAllister DR, Petrigliano FA. Surgical management of PCL injuries: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2013; 6 (02) 115-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Vaquero-Picado A, Rodríguez-Merchán EC. Isolated posterior cruciate ligament tears: an update of management. EFORT Open Rev 2017; 2 (04) 89-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Höher J, Scheffler S, Weiler A. Graft choice and graft fixation in PCL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003; 11 (05) 297-306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Quelard B, Sonnery-Cottet B, Zayni R. , et al. Isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is non-aggressive rehabilitation the right protocol?. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96 (03) 256-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Fanelli GC. Posterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation: how slow should we go?. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (02) 234-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Pierce CM, O'Brien L, Griffin LW, Laprade RF. Posterior cruciate ligament tears: functional and postoperative rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (05) 1071-1084
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Nyland J, Hester P, Caborn DNM. Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft tissue: 2-year postoperative outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2002; 10 (05) 274-279
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Bellelli A, Adriani E, Margheritini F, Camillieri G, Della Rocca C, Mariani PP. Synovial healing in reconstructed cruciate ligaments. Our personal experience compared in single interventions and combined reconstructions [in Italian]. Radiol Med (Torino) 1999; 98 (06) 454-461
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Kim JG, Lee YS, Yang BS, Oh SJ, Yang SJ. Rehabilitation after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of the literature and theoretical support. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133 (12) 1687-1695
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar