Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669901
Evaluation of Accuracy of a Three-Dimensional Printed Model in Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy
Publication History
25 February 2018
23 July 2018
Publication Date:
06 September 2018 (online)
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a three-dimensional (3D) printed model for open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). This study retrospectively evaluated 20 patients with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus deformity. Between October 2015 and July 2016, the patients underwent open-wedge HTO using a 3D printed model. The mean age of patients was 55.2 years (range, 51–60 years). The mean preoperative mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA) was varus 7.8 degrees (range, varus 4.7–11.6 degrees). After measuring the target angle using full-length lower limb weight-bearing radiography, the osteotomy was simulated using 3D images obtained from computed tomography (CT) with the 3D Slicer program. On the basis of the simulated osteotomy section and the target angle, the model was then designed and printed. Open-wedge HTO was then performed by applying the 3D printed model to the opening gap. The accuracy of osteotomy and the change in posterior tibial slope (PTS) angle were evaluated. The weight-bearing line on the tibial plateau was corrected from a preoperative mean of 19.5 ± 9.8% to a postoperative mean of 63.1 ± 6.1% (p < 0.001). The postoperative values were not statistically significantly different from the preoperative target points (p = 0.688). The mFTA was corrected to a postoperative mean of valgus 3.8 ± 1.4 degrees. The PTS angle showed no significant change (p = 0.256). A 3D printed model using CT may be useful for preoperative planning of open-wedge HTO. Satisfactory correction can be obtained without a change in the PTS.
-
References
- 1 Amendola A, Bonasia DE. Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature. Int Orthop 2010; 34 (02) 155-160
- 2 Coventry MB. Osteotomy of the upper portion of the tibia for degenerative arthritis of the knee. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1965; 47: 984-990
- 3 Lee DC, Byun SJ. High tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res 2012; 24 (02) 61-69
- 4 Sprenger TR, Doerzbacher JF. Tibial osteotomy for the treatment of varus gonarthrosis. Survival and failure analysis to twenty-two years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (03) 469-474
- 5 Kettelkamp DB, Wenger DR, Chao EY, Thompson C. Results of proximal tibial osteotomy. The effects of tibiofemoral angle, stance-phase flexion-extension, and medial-plateau force. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976; 58 (07) 952-960
- 6 Tjörnstrand B, Egund N, Hagstedt B, Lindstrand A. Tibial osteotomy in medial gonarthrosis. The importance of over-correction of varus deformity. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1981; 99 (02) 83-89
- 7 Coventry MB. Upper tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (07) 1136-1140
- 8 Lee YS, Kim MK, Byun HW, Kim SB, Kim JG. Reliability of the imaging software in the preoperative planning of the open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (03) 846-851
- 9 Marx RG, Grimm P, Lillemoe KA. , et al. Reliability of lower extremity alignment measurement using radiographs and PACS. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (10) 1693-1698
- 10 Miniaci A, Ballmer FT, Ballmer PM, Jakob RP. Proximal tibial osteotomy. A new fixation device. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (246) 250-259
- 11 Pape D, Seil R, Adam F, Rupp S, Kohn D, Lobenhoffer P. Imaging and preoperative planning of osteotomy of tibial head osteotomy [in German]. Orthopade 2004; 33 (02) 122-134
- 12 Hankemeier S, Hufner T, Wang G. , et al. Navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: advantages and disadvantages compared to the conventional technique in a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (10) 917-921
- 13 Heijens E, Kornherr P, Meister C. The role of navigation in high tibial osteotomy: a study of 50 patients. Orthopedics 2009; 32 (10, Suppl): 40-43
- 14 Saragaglia D, Roberts J. Navigated osteotomies around the knee in 170 patients with osteoarthritis secondary to genu varum. Orthopedics 2005; 28 (10, Suppl): s1269-s1274
- 15 Song SJ, Bae DK. Computer-assisted navigation in high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Surg 2016; 8 (04) 349-357
- 16 Kwun JD, Kim HJ, Park J, Park IH, Kyung HS. Open wedge high tibial osteotomy using three-dimensional printed models: experimental analysis using porcine bone. Knee 2017; 24 (01) 16-22
- 17 Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S. The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin North Am 1979; 10 (03) 585-608
- 18 Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D. Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69 (03) 332-354
- 19 Jackson JP, Waugh W. Tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1961; 43-B: 746-751
- 20 Peters PG, Laughlin RT, Markert RJ, Nelles DB, Randall KL, Prayson MJ. Timing of C-arm drape contamination. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2012; 13 (02) 110-113
- 21 Krackow KA, Pepe CL, Galloway EJ. A mathematical analysis of the effect of flexion and rotation on apparent varus/valgus alignment at the knee. Orthopedics 1990; 13 (08) 861-868
- 22 Poukens J, Haex J, Riediger D. The use of rapid prototyping in the preoperative planning of distraction osteogenesis of the cranio-maxillofacial skeleton. Comput Aided Surg 2003; 8 (03) 146-154
- 23 Wilde F, Cornelius CP, Schramm A. Computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction using a patient-specific reconstruction plate fabricated with computer-aided design and manufacturing techniques. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2014; 7 (02) 158-166
- 24 Starosolski ZA, Kan JH, Rosenfeld SD, Krishnamurthy R, Annapragada A. Application of 3-D printing (rapid prototyping) for creating physical models of pediatric orthopedic disorders. Pediatr Radiol 2014; 44 (02) 216-221
- 25 Wu XB, Wang JQ, Zhao CP. , et al. Printed three-dimensional anatomic templates for virtual preoperative planning before reconstruction of old pelvic injuries: initial results. Chin Med J (Engl) 2015; 128 (04) 477-482