Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80(03): 295-305
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1669937
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Pure Endoscopic Lateral Orbitotomy Approach to the Cavernous Sinus, Posterior, and Infratemporal Fossae: Anatomic Study

Lili Laleva
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
,
Toma Spiriev
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
,
Iacopo Dallan
2   First Otorhinolaryngologic Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
,
Alberto Prats-Galino
3   Laboratory of Surgical Neuroanatomy (LSNA), Faculty of Medicine, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
,
Giuseppe Catapano
4   Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery Operative Unit “G. Rummo” Hospital, Benevento, Italy
,
Vladimir Nakov
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
,
Matteo de Notaris
4   Department of Neuroscience, Neurosurgery Operative Unit “G. Rummo” Hospital, Benevento, Italy
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

09 July 2018

01 August 2018

Publication Date:
06 September 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The aim of this anatomic study is to describe a fully endoscopic lateral orbitotomy extradural approach to the cavernous sinus, posterior, and infratemporal fossae.

Material and Methods Three prefixed latex-injected head specimens (six orbital exposures) were used in the study. Before and after dissection, a computed tomography scan was performed on each cadaver head and a neuronavigation system was used to guide the approach. The extent of bone removal and the area of exposure of the targeted corridor were evaluated with the aid of OsiriX software (Pixmeo, Bernex, Switzerland).

Results The lateral orbital approach offers four main endoscopic extradural routes: the anteromedial, posteromedial, posterior, and inferior. The anteromedial route allows a direct route to the optic canal by removal of the anterior clinoid process, whereas the posteromedial route allows for exposure of the lateral wall of the cavernous sinus. The posterior route is targeted to Meckel's cave and provides access to the posterior cranial fossa by exposure and drilling of the petrous apex, whereas the inferior route gives access to the pterygopalatine and infratemporal fossae by drilling the floor of the middle cranial fossa and the bone between the second and third branches of the trigeminal nerve.

Conclusion The lateral orbitotomy endoscopic approach provides direct access to the cavernous sinus, posterior, and infratemporal fossae. Advantages of the approach include a favorable angle of attack, minimal brain retraction, and the possibility of dissection within the two dural layers of the cavernous sinus without entering its neurovascular compartment.

Keywords

lateral orbital approach - endoscopic surgery - skull base surgery - anatomy
 

  • References

  • 1 Al-Mefty O. Supraorbital-pterional approach to skull base lesions. Neurosurgery 1987; 21 (04) 474-477
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Hakuba A, Liu S, Nishimura S. The orbitozygomatic infratemporal approach: a new surgical technique. Surg Neurol 1986; 26 (03) 271-276
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Ikeda K, Yamashita J, Hashimoto M, Futami K. Orbitozygomatic temporopolar approach for a high basilar tip aneurysm associated with a short intracranial internal carotid artery: a new surgical approach. Neurosurgery 1991; 28 (01) 105-110
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Jane JA, Park TS, Pobereskin LH, Winn HR, Butler AB. The supraorbital approach: technical note. Neurosurgery 1982; 11 (04) 537-542
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Aziz KM, Froelich SC, Cohen PL, Sanan A, Keller JT, van Loveren HR. The one-piece orbitozygomatic approach: the MacCarty burr hole and the inferior orbital fissure as keys to technique and application. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002; 144 (01) 15-24
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Balasingam V, Noguchi A, McMenomey SO, Delashaw Jr JB. Modified osteoplastic orbitozygomatic craniotomy. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2005; 102 (05) 940-944
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Chanda A, Nanda A. Anatomical study of the orbitozygomatic transsellar-transcavernous-transclinoidal approach to the basilar artery bifurcation. J Neurosurg 2002; 97 (01) 151-160
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Figueiredo EG, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM. , et al. Quantitative anatomic study of three surgical approaches to the anterior communicating artery complex. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (2, Suppl): 397-405 , discussion 397–405
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Gonzalez LF, Crawford NR, Horgan MA, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Working area and angle of attack in three cranial base approaches: pterional, orbitozygomatic, and maxillary extension of the orbitozygomatic approach. Neurosurgery 2002; 50 (03) 550-555 , discussion 555–557
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Hsu FP, Clatterbuck RE, Spetzler RF. Orbitozygomatic approach to basilar apex aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (1, Suppl): 172-177 , discussion 172–177
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Schwartz MS, Anderson GJ, Horgan MA, Kellogg JX, McMenomey SO, Delashaw Jr JB. Quantification of increased exposure resulting from orbital rim and orbitozygomatic osteotomy via the frontotemporal transsylvian approach. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (06) 1020-1026
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Sekhar LN, Kalia KK, Yonas H, Wright DC, Ching H. Cranial base approaches to intracranial aneurysms in the subarachnoid space. Neurosurgery 1994; 35 (03) 472-481 , discussion 481–483
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Sindou M, Emery E, Acevedo G, Ben-David U. Respective indications for orbital rim, zygomatic arch and orbito-zygomatic osteotomies in the surgical approach to central skull base lesions. Critical, retrospective review in 146 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001; 143 (10) 967-975
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Tanriover N, Ulm AJ, Rhoton Jr AL, Kawashima M, Yoshioka N, Lewis SB. One-piece versus two-piece orbitozygomatic craniotomy: quantitative and qualitative considerations. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (04) (Suppl. 02) ONS-229-ONS-237 , discussion ONS-237
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Youssef AS, Willard L, Downes A. , et al. The frontotemporal-orbitozygomatic approach: reconstructive technique and outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012; 154 (07) 1275-1283
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Locatelli D, Pozzi F, Turri-Zanoni M. , et al. Transorbital endoscopic approaches to the skull base: current concepts and future perspectives. J Neurosurg Sci 2016; 60 (04) 514-525
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Altay T, Patel BC, Couldwell WT. Lateral orbital wall approach to the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg 2012; 116 (04) 755-763
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Balakrishnan K, Moe KS. Applications and outcomes of orbital and transorbital endoscopic surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 144 (05) 815-820
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Bly RA, Ramakrishna R, Ferreira M, Moe KS. Lateral transorbital neuroendoscopic approach to the lateral cavernous sinus. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75 (01) 11-17
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Ramakrishna R, Kim LJ, Bly RA, Moe K, Ferreira Jr M. Transorbital neuroendoscopic surgery for the treatment of skull base lesions. J Clin Neurosci 2016; 24: 99-104
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Arai H, Sato K, Katsuta T, Rhoton Jr AL. Lateral approach to intraorbital lesions: anatomic and surgical considerations. Neurosurgery 1996; 39 (06) 1157-1162 , discussion 1162–1163
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Rhoton Jr AL. The orbit. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (4, Suppl): S303-S334
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Abdel Aziz KM, Bhatia S, Tantawy MH. , et al. Minimally invasive transpalpebral “eyelid” approach to the anterior cranial base. Neurosurgery 2011; 69 (2, Suppl Operative): ons195-ons206 , discussion 206–207
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Mariniello G, Maiuri F, de Divitiis E. , et al. Lateral orbitotomy for removal of sphenoid wing meningiomas invading the orbit. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (6, Suppl Operative): 287-292 , discussion 292
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Ulutas M, Boyacı S, Akakın A, Kılıç T, Aksoy K. Surgical anatomy of the cavernous sinus, superior orbital fissure, and orbital apex via a lateral orbitotomy approach: a cadaveric anatomical study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158 (11) 2135-2148
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Lyson T, Sieskiewicz A, Rogowski M, Mariak Z. Endoscopic lateral orbitotomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014; 156 (10) 1897-1900
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Ciporen JN, Moe KS, Ramanathan D. , et al. Multiportal endoscopic approaches to the central skull base: a cadaveric study. World Neurosurg 2010; 73 (06) 705-712
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Ferrari M, Schreiber A, Mattavelli D. , et al. The inferolateral transorbital endoscopic approach: a preclinical anatomical study. World Neurosurg 2016; 90: 403-413
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL. , et al. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: analysis of complications in the authors' initial 800 patients. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (06) 1544-1568
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Koutourousiou M, Gardner PA, Stefko ST. , et al. Combined endoscopic endonasal transorbital approach with transconjunctival-medial orbitotomy for excisional biopsy of the optic nerve: technical note. J Neurol Surg Rep 2012; 73 (01) 52-56
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Muto J, Prevedello DM, Ditzel Filho LF. , et al. Comparative analysis of the anterior transpetrosal approach with the endoscopic endonasal approach to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg 2016; 125 (05) 1171-1186
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Dallan I, Castelnuovo P, de Notaris M. , et al. Endoscopic endonasal anatomy of superior orbital fissure and orbital apex regions: critical considerations for clinical applications. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270 (05) 1643-1649
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Andaluz N, Romano A, Reddy LV, Zuccarello M. Eyelid approach to the anterior cranial base. J Neurosurg 2008; 109 (02) 341-346
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Ammirati M, Spallone A, Ma J, Cheatham M, Becker D. An anatomicosurgical study of the temporal branch of the facial nerve. Neurosurgery 1993; 33 (06) 1038-1043 , discussion 1044
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Coscarella E, Vishteh AG, Spetzler RF, Seoane E, Zabramski JM. Subfascial and submuscular methods of temporal muscle dissection and their relationship to the frontal branch of the facial nerve. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2000; 92 (05) 877-880
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Krayenbühl N, Isolan GR, Hafez A, Yaşargil MG. The relationship of the fronto-temporal branches of the facial nerve to the fascias of the temporal region: a literature review applied to practical anatomical dissection. Neurosurg Rev 2007; 30 (01) 8-15 , discussion 15
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Schmidt BL, Pogrel MA, Hakim-Faal Z. The course of the temporal branch of the facial nerve in the periorbital region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59 (02) 178-184
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Spiriev T, Ebner FH, Hirt B. , et al. Fronto-temporal branch of facial nerve within the interfascial fat pad: is the interfascial dissection really safe?. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158 (03) 527-532
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Spiriev T, Poulsgaard L, Fugleholm K. Techniques for preservation of the frontotemporal branch of facial nerve during orbitozygomatic approaches. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76 (03) 189-194
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Yaşargil MG, Reichman MV, Kubik S. Preservation of the frontotemporal branch of the facial nerve using the interfascial temporalis flap for pterional craniotomy. Technical article. J Neurosurg 1987; 67 (03) 463-466
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Mori K, Osada H, Yamamoto T, Nakao Y, Maeda M. Pterional keyhole approach to middle cerebral artery aneurysms through an outer canthal skin incision. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2007; 50 (04) 195-201
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Shimizu S, Tanriover N, Rhoton Jr AL, Yoshioka N, Fujii K. MacCarty keyhole and inferior orbital fissure in orbitozygomatic craniotomy. Neurosurgery 2005; 57 (1, Suppl): 152-159 , discussion 152–159
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Shoja MM, Cohen-Gadol AA. Refined and simplified surgical landmarks for the MacCarty keyhole and orbitozygomatic craniotomy. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (6, Suppl Operative): 230-233
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Spiriev T, Poulsgaard L, Fugleholm K. One piece orbitozygomatic approach based on the sphenoid ridge keyhole: anatomical study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2016; 77 (03) 199-206
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Bayassi S. Meningo-orbital fold (MOF) as a guiding point in extradural approach to the anterior clinoid process [in Polish]. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2005; 39 (01) 49-55
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Fukuda H, Evins AI, Burrell JC, Iwasaki K, Stieg PE, Bernardo A. The meningo-orbital band: microsurgical anatomy and surgical detachment of the membranous structures through a frontotemporal craniotomy with removal of the anterior clinoid process. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75 (02) 125-132
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Ribas GC, Ribas EC, Rodrigues CJ. The anterior sylvian point and the suprasylvian operculum. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 18 (6B, 6b): E2
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Dallan I, Di Somma A, Prats-Galino A. , et al. Endoscopic transorbital route to the cavernous sinus through the meningo-orbital band: a descriptive anatomical study. J Neurosurg 2017; 127 (03) 622-629
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Coscarella E, Başkaya MK, Morcos JJ. An alternative extradural exposure to the anterior clinoid process: the superior orbital fissure as a surgical corridor. Neurosurgery 2003; 53 (01) 162-166 , discussion 166–167
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Ammirati M, Bernardo A. Anatomical study of the superior orbital fissure as seen during a pterional approach. J Neurosurg 2007; 106 (01) 151-156
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Dolenc V. Anatomy and Surgery of the Cavernous Sinus. Wien, New York: Springer-Verlag; 2013
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 52 Dolenc V. Microsurgical Anatomy and Surgery of the Central Skull Base. Wien, New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 53 Day JD. Cranial base surgical techniques for large sphenocavernous meningiomas: technical note. Neurosurgery 2000; 46 (03) 754-759 , discussion 759–760
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Goel A. The extradural approach to lesions involving the cavernous sinus. Br J Neurosurg 1997; 11 (02) 134-138
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Kawase T, van Loveren H, Keller JT, Tew JM. Meningeal architecture of the cavernous sinus: clinical and surgical implications. Neurosurgery 1996; 39 (03) 527-534 , discussion 534–536
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Shi X, Han H, Zhao J, Zhou C. Microsurgical anatomy of the superior orbital fissure. Clin Anat 2007; 20 (04) 362-366
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Kinzel A, Spangenberg P, Lutz S. , et al. Microsurgical and histological identification and definition of an interdural incision zone in the dorsolateral cavernous sinus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2015; 157 (08) 1359-1367 , discussion 1367
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Kawase T, Toya S, Shiobara R, Mine T. Transpetrosal approach for aneurysms of the lower basilar artery. J Neurosurg 1985; 63 (06) 857-861
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Kawase T, Shiobara R, Toya S. Anterior transpetrosal-transtentorial approach for sphenopetroclival meningiomas: surgical method and results in 10 patients. Neurosurgery 1991; 28 (06) 869-875 , discussion 875–876
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Kawase T, Shiobara R, Toya S. Middle fossa transpetrosal-transtentorial approaches for petroclival meningiomas. Selective pyramid resection and radicality. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1994; 129 (3-4): 113-120
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Osawa S, Rhoton Jr AL, Seker A, Shimizu S, Fujii K, Kassam AB. Microsurgical and endoscopic anatomy of the vidian canal. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (05) (Suppl. 02) 385-411 , discussion 411–412
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 de Lara D, Ditzel Filho LF, Prevedello DM. , et al. Endonasal endoscopic approaches to the paramedian skull base. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (6, Suppl): S121-S129
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 63 Tsirbas A, Kazim M, Close L. Endoscopic approach to orbital apex lesions. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 21 (04) 271-275
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 64 Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito I, Solari D. Sellar-Tuberculum approach. In: Kassam AB, Gardner P. , eds. Endoscopic Approach to the Skull Base . Pittsburgh: Karger; 2008
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 65 Cavallo LM, Prevedello DM, Solari D. , et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg 2009; 111 (03) 578-589
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 66 Cavallo LM, Messina A, Gardner P. , et al. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the pterygopalatine fossa: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (01) E5
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 67 Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB. Expanded endonasal approach for olfactory groove meningioma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009; 151 (03) 287-288 , author reply 289–290
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 68 Fernandez-Miranda JC, Prevedello DM, Gardner P, Carrau R, Snyderman CH, Kassam AB. Endonasal endoscopic pituitary surgery: is it a matter of fashion?. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010; 152 (08) 1281-1282 , author reply 1282
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 69 Fortes FS, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH. , et al. Transpterygoid transposition of a temporoparietal fascia flap: a new method for skull base reconstruction after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (06) 970-976
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 70 Gardner PA, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH. The evolution of the endonasal approach for craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (05) 1043-1047
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 71 Kassam A, Snyderman C, Carrau R. An evolving paradigm to the ventral skull base. Skull Base 2004; 14 (Suppl. 01) xx
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 72 Kassam A, Thomas AJ, Snyderman C. , et al. Fully endoscopic expanded endonasal approach treating skull base lesions in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg 2007; 106 (2, Suppl) 75-86
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 73 Kassam AB, Gardner P, Snyderman C, Mintz A, Carrau R. Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (01) E6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 74 Kassam AB, Vescan AD, Carrau RL. , et al. Expanded endonasal approach: vidian canal as a landmark to the petrous internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (01) 177-183
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 75 Morera VA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Prevedello DM. , et al. “Far-medial” expanded endonasal approach to the inferior third of the clivus: the transcondylar and transjugular tubercle approaches. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (6, Suppl Operative): 211-219 , discussion 219–220
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 76 Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL. , et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (10) 1882-1886
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 77 Kassam AB, Thomas A, Carrau RL. , et al. Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (01) (Suppl. 01) ONS44-ONS52 , discussion ONS52–ONS53
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 78 Oliver CL, Hackman TG, Carrau RL. , et al. Palatal flap modifications allow pedicled reconstruction of the skull base. Laryngoscope 2008; 118 (12) 2102-2106
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 79 Prevedello DM, Barges-Coll J, Fernandez-Miranda JC. , et al. Middle turbinate flap for skull base reconstruction: cadaveric feasibility study. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (11) 2094-2098
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 80 Leng LZ, Brown S, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. “Gasket-seal” watertight closure in minimal-access endoscopic cranial base surgery. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (05) (Suppl. 02) E342-E343 , discussion E343
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 81 Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Valente V. , et al. Sellar repair with fibrin sealant and collagen fleece after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Surg Neurol 2004; 62 (03) 227-233 , discussion 233
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 82 Spaziante R, de Divitiis E, Cappabianca P, Zona G. Repair of the sella turcica after transsphenoidal surgery. In: Schmidek HH, Roberts DW. , eds. Schmidek and Sweet Operative Neurosurgical Techniques. Indications, Methods and Results. Vol. 1. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2005: 390-408
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 83 Esposito F, Dusick JR, Fatemi N, Kelly DF. Graded repair of cranial base defects and cerebrospinal fluid leaks in transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery 2007; 60 (04) (Suppl. 02) 295-303 , discussion 303–304
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 84 Nyquist GG, Anand VK, Mehra S, Kacker A, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal repair of anterior skull base non-traumatic cerebrospinal fluid leaks, meningoceles, and encephaloceles. J Neurosurg 2010; 113 (05) 961-966
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 85 Altay T, Couldwell WT. The frontotemporal (pterional) approach: an historical perspective. Neurosurgery 2012; 71 (02) 481-491 , discussion 491–492
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 86 Mandel M, Figueiredo EG, Mandel SA, Tutihashi R, Teixeira MJ. Minimally invasive transpalpebral endoscopic-assisted amygdalohippocampectomy. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2017; 13 (01) 2-14
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 87 Di Somma A, Cavallo LM, de Notaris M. , et al. Endoscopic endonasal medial-to-lateral and transorbital lateral-to-medial optic nerve decompression: an anatomical study with surgical implications. J Neurosurg 2017; 127 (01) 199-208
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 88 Koppe M, Gleizal A, Orset E, Bachelet JT, Jouanneau E, Rougeot A. Superior eyelid crease approach for transobital neuroendoscopic surgery of the anterior cranial fossa. J Craniofac Surg 2013; 24 (05) 1616-1621
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 89 Dallan I, Castelnuovo P, Locatelli D. , et al. Multiportal combined transorbital transnasal endoscopic approach for the management of selected skull base lesions: preliminary experience. World Neurosurg 2015; 84 (01) 97-107
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 90 Dallan I, Locatelli D, Turri-Zanoni M. , et al. Transorbital endoscopic assisted resection of a superior orbital fissure cavernous haemangioma: a technical case report. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272 (12) 3851-3856
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar