PDF herunterladen
J Knee Surg 2019; 32(09): 906-910
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1672120
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Outcome after Combined Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision in Professional Soccer Players

Mattia Alessio-Mazzola
1   Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
,
Matteo Formica
1   Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
,
Antonio Russo
1   Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
,
Francesca Sanguineti
1   Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
,
Andrea Giorgio Capello
1   Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
,
Stefano Lovisolo
1   Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
,
Lamberto Felli
1   Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

12. April 2018

15. August 2018

Publikationsdatum:
18. September 2018 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

We report the functional outcome after combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) for ACL re-rupture and high-grade pivot shift in professional soccer players. For this retrospective review, the medical records of 24 professional soccer players were analyzed. The mean age at surgery was 23.8 ± 4.2 years and the mean follow-up was 42.2 ± 16.9 months. Pre- and postoperative assessment included the KT-1000 Lachman test, pivot shift test, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation, Tegner activity scale (TAS), and Lysholm score. The rate of return to sports and the level of play at final follow-up were recorded. ACL revision was performed with an autologous bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft or a hamstring graft. LET was performed using an extra-articular MacIntosh procedure as modified by Arnold–Coker. Anterior–posterior laxity was significantly reduced at the final clinical assessment (p < 0.0001): 22 patients (91.7%) had a negative pivot shift and 2 (8.3%) had residual glide (+), with significant improvement (p < 0.0001). The mean subjective IKDC and Lysholm score improved from 69.5 ± 11.1 (range: 56–90) to 88.4 ± 8.9 (range: 62.1–100) and from 58.1 ± 11.7 (range: 33–72) to 97.4 ± 3.2 (range: 88–100), respectively, with significant improvement (p < 0.0001) over preoperative values. The overall failure rate was 8.3%. There were no differences between mean preinjury and final TAS scores (p > 0.05). The rate of return to sports at the same level was 91.7% and the mean time to return to sports was 9.2 ± 2.2 months. Mid-term functional outcome after combined extra-articular reconstruction and ACL revision surgery was satisfactory, with a reduction in residual postoperative rotatory instability and degree of pivot shift.

Keywords

ACL reconstruction - lateral extra-articular tenodesis - knee rotational instability - ACL revision - Arnold–Coker - MacIntosh
 

  • References

  • 1 Vundelinckx B, Herman B, Getgood A, Litchfield R. Surgical indications and technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis or anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 2017; 36 (01) 135-153
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Crawford SN, Waterman BR, Lubowitz JH. Long-term failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (09) 1566-1571
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Paterno MV, Rauh MJ, Schmitt LC, Ford KR, Hewett TE. Incidence of second ACL injuries 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (07) 1567-1573
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 George MS, Dunn WR, Spindler KP. Current concepts review: revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34 (12) 2026-2037
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Alessio-Mazzola M, Formica M, Coviello M, Basso M, Felli L. Conservative treatment of meniscal tears in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 2016; 23 (04) 642-646
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Bull AM, Amis AA. The pivot-shift phenomenon: a clinical and biomechanical perspective. Knee 1998; 3: 141-158
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Musahl V, Getgood A, Neyret P. , et al. Contributions of the anterolateral complex and the anterolateral ligament to rotatory knee stability in the setting of ACL injury: a roundtable discussion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (04) 997-1008
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Monaco E, Maestri B, Labianca L. , et al. Navigated knee kinematics after tear of the ACL and its secondary restraints: preliminary results. Orthopedics 2010; 33 (10, Suppl): 87-93
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ. Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (03) 629-634
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Song GY, Hong L, Zhang H, Zhang J, Li Y, Feng H. Clinical outcomes of combined lateral extra-articular tenodesis and intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in addressing high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (05) 898-905
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Guzzini M, Mazza D, Fabbri M. , et al. Extra-articular tenodesis combined with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in acute anterior cruciate ligament tear in elite female football players. Int Orthop 2016; 40 (10) 2091-2096
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Sonnery-Cottet B, Saithna A, Cavalier M. , et al. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction is associated with significantly reduced ACL graft rupture rates at a minimum follow-up of 2 years: a prospective comparative study of 502 patients from the SANTI Study Group. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (07) 1547-1557
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Colombet P. Knee laxity control in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and lateral tenodesis: clinical assessment using computer-assisted navigation. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (06) 1248-1254
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Lemaire M. Rupture ancienne du ligament croisé antérieur du genou. J Chir (Paris) 1967; 93: 311-320
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Ireland J, Trickey EL. Macintosh tenodesis for anterolateral instability of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1980; 62 (03) 340-345
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Trichine F, Alsaati M, Chouteau J, Moyen B, Bouzitouna M, Maza R. Patellar tendon autograft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with and without lateral plasty in advanced-stage chronic laxity. A clinical, prospective, randomized, single-blind study using passive dynamic X-rays. Knee 2014; 21 (01) 58-65
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Slette EL, Mikula JD, Schon JM. , et al. Biomechanical results of lateral extra-articular tenodesis procedures of the knee: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (12) 2592-2611
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Trojani C, Beaufils P, Burdin G. , et al. Revision ACL reconstruction: influence of a lateral tenodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (08) 1565-1570
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Rezende FC, de Moraes VY, Martimbianco AL, Luzo MV, da Silveira Franciozi CE, Belloti JC. Does combined intra- and extraarticular ACL reconstruction improve function and stability? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (08) 2609-2618
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Duthon VB, Magnussen RA, Servien E, Neyret P. ACL reconstruction and extra-articular tenodesis. Clin Sports Med 2013; 32 (01) 141-153
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Noyes FR, Barber SD. The effect of an extra-articular procedure on allograft reconstructions for chronic ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73 (06) 882-892
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Sonnery-Cottet B, Archbold P, Zayni R. , et al. Prevalence of septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction among professional athletes. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (11) 2371-2376
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Runer A, Birkmaier S, Pamminger M. , et al. The anterolateral ligament of the knee: a dissection study. Knee 2016; 23 (01) 8-12
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Edwards DJ, Brown JN, Roberts SNJ, Paterson RS. Long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using ilio-tibial tract and semitendinosis tendon. Knee 2000; 7 (02) 87-93
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Carson EW, Anisko EM, Restrepo C, Panariello RA, O'Brien SJ, Warren RF. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: etiology of failures and clinical results. J Knee Surg 2004; 17 (03) 127-132
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Wright R, Spindler K, Huston L. , et al. Revision ACL reconstruction outcomes: MOON cohort. J Knee Surg 2011; 24 (04) 289-294
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar