Carpal Alignment: A New Method for Assessment

Abstract

Background Carpal alignment may be used as a tool to evaluate fracture reduction in patients with distal radius fractures. However, there is little consensus on how to measure and quantify carpal alignment.

Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the inter- and intraobserver variability of a new perpendicular method with the existing method in fractured and unfractured wrists. Additionally, the normal distribution of carpal alignment in unfractured wrists was investigated.

Patients and Methods Carpal alignment was assessed on lateral plain radiographs using two different methods, one described by Ng and McQueen and another newly proposed method, the perpendicular method. Using the perpendicular method, the observer draws one line along the inner rim of the volar cortex of the radius and one perpendicular line to the center of the capitate. The carpus is aligned when the line along the inner rim transects the center of the capitate. Three examiners measured the carpal alignment in 50 patients with nonfractured and 50 patients with fractured distal radius. Intra- and interobserver variability for both methods were determined.

Results The interobserver coefficient for the perpendicular method was 0.98 and that for the Ng method was 0.86. The intraobserver coefficients for three examiners were 0.89, 0.62, and 0.63, respectively, for the Ng method. For the perpendicular method, the intraobserver variability was 0.96, 0.89, and 0.72, respectively. In patients with unfractured wrists, the mean perpendicular to the center of the capitate was 0.25 mm dorsally.

Conclusion The new proposed method is a reproducible method for measuring carpal alignment with a high inter- and intraclass coefficient.

Clinical Relevance This method of measurement allows for a reproducible technique for measuring carpal alignment.

Keywords

carpal alignment - measurements - distal radius fracture

Note

Thise work was performed in both the institutions.

• References

• 1 Kumar S, Penematsa S, Sadri M, Deshmukh SC. Can radiological results be surrogate markers of functional outcome in distal radial extra-articular fractures?. Int Orthop 2008; 32 (04) 505-509
• 2 Bentohami A, Bijlsma TS, Goslings JC, de Reuver P, Kaufmann L, Schep NWL. Radiological criteria for acceptable reduction of extra-articular distal radial fractures are not predictive for patient-reported functional outcome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2013; 38 (05) 524-529
• 3 Karnezis IA, Panagiotopoulos E, Tyllianakis M, Megas P, Lambiris E. Correlation between radiological parameters and patient-rated wrist dysfunction following fractures of the distal radius. Injury 2005; 36 (12) 1435-1439
• 4 Ng CY, McQueen MM. What are the radiological predictors of functional outcome following fractures of the distal radius?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (02) 145-150
• 5 Arora R, Gabl M, Gschwentner M, Deml C, Krappinger D, Lutz M. A comparative study of clinical and radiologic outcomes of unstable Colles type distal radius fractures in patients older than 70 years: nonoperative treatment versus volar locking plating. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23 (04) 237-242
• 6 Goldhahn J, Angst F, Simmen BR. What counts: outcome assessment after distal radius fractures in aged patients. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22 (8, Suppl): S126-S130
• 7 Bickerstaff DR, Bell MJ. Carpal malalignment in Colles' fractures. J Hand Surg [Br] 1989; 14 (02) 155-160
• 8 McQueen MM, Hajducka C, Court-Brown CM. Redisplaced unstable fractures of the distal radius: a prospective randomised comparison of four methods of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78 (03) 404-409
• 9 Batra S, Debnath U, Kanvinde R. Can carpal malalignment predict early and late instability in nonoperatively managed distal radius fractures?. Int Orthop 2008; 32 (05) 685-691
• 10 Gupta A, Batra S, Jain P, Sharma SK. Carpal alignment in distal radial fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2002; 3: 1
• 11 Mackenney PJ, McQueen MM, Elton R. Prediction of instability in distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (09) 1944-1951
• 12 Jeanne LA. . Mouchet, A, eds. Less lesions traumatiques fermees du poignet. Presented at the 28th Congress Francais de Chirugie, 1919. , Paris, France
• 13 Verhaegen F, Degreef I, De Smet L. Evaluation of corrective osteotomy of the malunited distal radius on midcarpal and radiocarpal malalignment. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (01) 57-61
• 14 O'Flanagan SJ, Ip FK, Roberts CJ, Chow SP. Carpal malalignment following intra-articular fractures of the distal radius in a working population. Injury 1995; 26 (04) 231-235
• 15 Walenkamp MM, Bentohami A, Slaar A. , et al. The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 389
• 16 Taleisnik J, Watson HK. Midcarpal instability caused by malunited fractures of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9 (03) 350-357
• 17 Lewis OJ, Hamshere RJ, Bucknill TM. The anatomy of the wrist joint. J Anat 1970; 106 (Pt 3): 539-552
• 18 Hallgren KA. Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 2012; 8 (01) 23-34
• 19 Koh KH, Lee HI, Lim KS, Seo JS, Park MJ. Effect of wrist position on the measurement of carpal indices on the lateral radiograph. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2013; 38 (05) 530-541
• 20 Brahin B, Allieu Y. Compensatory carpal malalignments [in French]. Ann Chir Main 1984; 3 (04) 357-363