Do-It-Yourself Microsuture from Human Hair for Basic Microsurgical Training

Abstract

Background Microsuture is an essential material for basic microsurgical training. However, it is consumable, expensive, and sometimes unavailable in the microsurgical laboratory. To solve this problem, we developed a microsuture made from human hair and needle gauge.

Methods Do-It-Yourself (DIY) microsuture is made from human hair and needle gauge 32G (BD Ultra-Fine Pen Needles 4 mm × 32G). Methods are explained step by step. This DIY microsuture (labeled as “test microsuture”) and nylon 8–0 (Ethilon suture 8–0, labeled as “standard microsuture”) were used for teaching orthopaedic residents to perform arterial anastomosis in chicken thighs. All residents practiced without knowing that “test microsuture” was made from the DIY method. After completing the training, quality of both microsutures was evaluated by questionnaire in topics of (1) thread quality (size, strength, elasticity, handing, knot perform, and knot security), (2) needle quality (size, curve, shape, sharpness, handling, and strength), (3) needle–thread interface (size, strength, and smoothness), and (4) overall quality of microsuture. Each category was evaluated by Likert score (5 = excellent, 4 = good, 3 = fair, 2 = poor, and 1 = very poor).

Results The DIY microsuture was performed in three steps: (1) insert human hair into needle gauge by microforceps, (2) bend needle into smooth curve, and (3) disconnect needle and create needle–hair interface. The questionnaire was completed by 30 orthopaedic residents and showed that thread quality of DIY and standard microsuture had “good” and “good-to-excellent” quality (mean Likert score: 3.77–4.23 and 3.80–4.27, respectively, with no statistical difference). Thread–needle interface quality of DIY and standard microsuture also had “good” and “good-to-excellent” quality (Likert score: 3.73–4.20 and 4.07–4.33, respectively, with no statistical difference). Needle part of DIY microsuture had lower quality than standard suture (fair-to-good compared with good-to-excellence quality, score 3.30–3.67 vs. 4.20–4.27, respectively, with a statistically significant difference, p-value < 0.05). However, overall quality of DIY suture and standard microsuture had “good” and “good-to-excellent” (mean Likert score: 3.73 and 4.00, respectively, with no statistical difference).

Conclusion The DIY microsuture from human hair and needle gauge could be an alternative for basic microsurgical training with lower cost, easy production, and more availability for use in practice with acceptable quality compared with that of standard microsuture.

Keywords

hair - microsuture - microsurgery

• References

• 1 Kim BJ, Kim ST, Jeong YG, Lee WH, Lee KS, Paeng SH. An efficient microvascular anastomosis training model based on chicken wings and simple instruments. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 2013; 15 (01) 20-25
• 2 Acland RD, Sabapathy SR. Acland's practice manual for microvascular surgery, third edition. Indian J Plast Surg 2008; 41 (02) 247
• 3 Tamrakar K. Learning microvascular anastomosis in low socioeconomic vascular models during residency. Cureus 2017; 9 (04) e1199
• 4 Olabe J, Olabe J. Microsurgical training on an in vitro chicken wing infusion model. Surg Neurol 2009; 72 (06) 695-699
• 5 Hino A. Training in microvascular surgery using a chicken wing artery. Neurosurgery 2003; 52 (06) 1495-1497 , discussion 1497–1498
• 6 Lannon DA, Atkins JA, Butler PE. Non-vital, prosthetic, and virtual reality models of microsurgical training. Microsurgery 2001; 21 (08) 389-393
• 7 Krishnan KG, Dramm P, Schackert G. Simple and viable in vitro perfusion model for training microvascular anastomoses. Microsurgery 2004; 24 (04) 335-338
• 8 Corson SL, Smith DC. Principles and instrumentation of microsurgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1980; 23 (04) 1201-1211
• 9 Chen LE, Seaber AV, Urbaniak JR. Comparison of 10-0 polypropylene and 10-0 nylon sutures in rat arterial anastomosis. Microsurgery 1993; 14 (05) 328-333
• 10 Thiede A, Lütjohann K, Beck C, Blunck F. Absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in microsurgery: standardized comparable studies in rats. J Microsurg 1979; 1 (03) 216-222
• 11 Krag C, Larsen J, Reumert T. Handling properties and thrombogenicity of microsutures. J Microsurg 1981; 2 (03) 202-205
• 12 Huang GK, Li HQ, Wu XM. Study on microvascular anastomosis of arteries with absorbable polyglyconate suture. Microsurgery 1995; 16 (07) 505-509
• 13 Doğan T, Gürünlüoğlu R, Bayramiçli M, Numanoğlu A. Use of polyfilament suture as a source of microsuture. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (01) 270-271
• 14 Kuhbier JW, Reimers K, Kasper C. , et al. First investigation of spider silk as a braided microsurgical suture. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2011; 97 (02) 381-387
• 15 Pereira EA, Cotton MH. Using fishing line for suturing. Trop Doct 2006; 36 (03) 155-156
• 16 Longombe AO, Ralaimiarison A, Lusi KM. The use of fishing nylon for surgery in rural areas in north east Zaïre. Trop Doct 1993; 23 (04) 179-180
• 17 Eroğlu L, Güneren E, Akbaş H, Demir A, Uysal A. Using human hair as suture material in microsurgical practice. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19 (01) 37-40
• 18 van Oosterwyk A. Atraumatic sutures can be made locally. Trop Doct 2004; 34 (02) 95-96
• 19 Sood GC, Sen DK, Sota LD. Human hair sutures in ophthalmic surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1970; 54 (05) 335-337
• 20 Al Azrak M, Ogawa R. Dermatologic microsutures using human hair: a useful technique in cutaneous stitching. Eplasty 2017; 17: e24
• 21 Trignano E, Fallico N, Zingone G, Dessy LA, Campus GV. Microsurgical training with the three-step approach. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (02) 87-91
• 22 Cifuentes IJ, Rodriguez JR, Yañez RA. , et al. A novel ex vivo training model for acquiring supermicrosurgical skills using a chicken leg. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (09) 699-705
• 23 Willis RE, Wiersch J, Adams AJ, Al Fayyadh MJ, Weber RA, Wang HT. Development and evaluation of a simulation model for microvascular anastomosis training. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (07) 493-501