J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80(04): 437-440 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675752
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Rate after Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery via Middle Cranial Fossa Approach
Noga Lipschitz
1
Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Gavriel D. Kohlberg
1
Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Kareem O. Tawfik
1
Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Zoe A. Walters
1
Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Joseph T. Breen
1
Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Mario Zuccarello
2
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Norberto Andaluz
3
Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Vincent A. Dinapoli
3
Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Myles L. Pensak
1
Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
,
Ravi N. Samy
1
Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
› Author AffiliationsFunding This study received no financial support. Dr. R.N.S. has received research support and honoraria from Cochlear Corporation.
Objective Evaluate the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rate after the middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach to vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection.
Design Retrospective case series.
Setting Quaternary referral academic center.
Participants Of 161 patients undergoing the MCF approach for a variety of skull base pathologies, 66 patients underwent this approach for VS resection between 2007 and 2017.
Main Outcome Measure Postoperative CSF leak rate.
Results There were two instances of postoperative CSF leak (3.0%). Age, gender, and BMI were not significantly associated with CSF leak. In the two cases with CSF leakage, tumors were isolated to the internal auditory canal (IAC) and both underwent gross total resection. Both CSF leaks were successfully treated with lumbar drain diversion. For the 64 cases that did not have a CSF leak, 51 were isolated to the IAC, 1 was located only in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA), and 12 were located in both the IAC and CPA. 62 patients underwent gross total resection and 2 underwent near-total resection. Mean maximal tumor diameter in the CSF leak group was 4.5 mm (range: 3–6 mm) versus 10.2 mm (range: 3–19 mm) in patients with no CSF leak (p = 0.03).
Conclusions The MCF approach for VS resection is a valuable technique that allows for hearing preservation and total tumor resection and can be performed with a low CSF leakage rate. This rate of CSF leak is less than the reported rates in the literature in regard to both translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approaches.
1
Scheich M,
Ginzkey C,
Ehrmann-Müller D,
Shehata-Dieler W,
Hagen R.
Management of CSF leakage after microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma via the middle cranial fossa approach. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273 (10) 2975-2981
3
Karpinos M,
Teh BS,
Zeck O.
, et al. Treatment of acoustic neuroma: stereotactic radiosurgery vs. microsurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 54 (05) 1410-1421
5
Sanna M,
Taibah A,
Russo A,
Falcioni M,
Agarwal M.
Perioperative complications in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) surgery. Otol Neurotol 2004; 25 (03) 379-386
7
Selesnick SH,
Liu JC,
Jen A,
Newman J.
The incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leak after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otol Neurotol 2004; 25 (03) 387-393
8
Fishman AJ,
Marrinan MS,
Golfinos JG,
Cohen NL,
Roland Jr JT.
Prevention and management of cerebrospinal fluid leak following vestibular schwannoma surgery. Laryngoscope 2004; 114 (03) 501-505
9
Merkus P,
Taibah A,
Sequino G,
Sanna M.
Less than 1% cerebrospinal fluid leakage in 1,803 translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma surgery cases. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31 (02) 276-283
11
Mangus BD,
Rivas A,
Yoo MJ.
, et al. Management of cerebrospinal fluid leaks after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otol Neurotol 2011; 32 (09) 1525-1529
13
Brennan JW,
Rowed DW,
Nedzelski JM,
Chen JM.
Cerebrospinal fluid leak after acoustic neuroma surgery: influence of tumor size and surgical approach on incidence and response to treatment. J Neurosurg 2001; 94 (02) 217-223
14
Lüdemann WO,
Stieglitz LH,
Gerganov V,
Samii A,
Samii M.
Fat implant is superior to muscle implant in vestibular schwannoma surgery for the prevention of cerebrospinal fluid fistulae. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (01) , Suppl (Suppl. 01) ONS38-ONS42 , discussion 42–43
15
Stieglitz LH,
Giordano M,
Gerganov VM,
Samii A,
Samii M,
Lüdemann WO.
How obliteration of petrosal air cells by vestibular schwannoma influences the risk of postoperative CSF fistula. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2011; 113 (09) 746-751
16
Mantravadi AV,
Leonetti JP,
Burgette R,
Pontikis G,
Marzo SJ,
Anderson D.
Body mass index predicts risk for complications from transtemporal cerebellopontine angle surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 148 (03) 460-465
17
Copeland WR,
Mallory GW,
Neff BA,
Driscoll CL,
Link MJ.
Are there modifiable risk factors to prevent a cerebrospinal fluid leak following vestibular schwannoma surgery?. J Neurosurg 2015; 122 (02) 312-316
18
Rodgers GK,
Luxford WM.
Factors affecting the development of cerebrospinal fluid leak and meningitis after translabyrinthine acoustic tumor surgery. Laryngoscope 1993; 103 (09) 959-962
19
Mangham CA.
Complications of translabyrinthine vs. suboccipital approach for acoustic tumor surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 99 (04) 396-400
23
Lee SY,
Lee SH,
Tan JHH.
, et al. Factors associated with prolonged length of stay for elective hepatobiliary and neurosurgery patients: a retrospective medical record review. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18 (01) 5