An overview of the rationale for qualitative research methods in social health

Heather L. Stuckey

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1676173

Journal of Social Health and Diabetes, Table of Contents

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Social Health and Diabetes 2013; 01(01): 006-008
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676173

Methodologies in Social Health and Diabetes

NovoNordisk Education Foundation

An overview of the rationale for qualitative research methods in social health

Heather L. Stuckey

Department of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, USA

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Qualitative research is a primary way to understand the context of diabetes in a person′s life, beyond the medical outcomes. Identifying the qualitative issues such as patients′ knowledge about diabetes, their beliefs and attitudes, and their relationship with health care professionals can serve as data to determine the obstacles and, in turn, resolutions to those issues in diabetes management. Characteristics of qualitative and quantitative methods are described, with the discussion that both methods are complementary, not conflicting, to further the field of diabetes research.

Diabetes research - psychosocial issues - qualitative research - research methods - social issues

Full Text

References

References
1 Narayanasamy A. Spiritual coping mechanisms in chronically ill patients. Br J Nurs 2002; 11: 1461-1475
2 Daaleman TP, Kuckelman-Cobb A, Frey B. Spirituality and well-being: An exploratory study of the patient perspective. J Soc Sci Med 2001; 53: 1503-1511
3 Lyons MA, Jacobson SS, Prescott B, Oswalt D. Women's experiences during the first year following diagnosis. South Online J Nurs Res 2002; 3: 1-26
4 Sturge-Jacobs M. The experience of living with fibromyalgia: Confronting an invisible disability [Electronic version]. Res Theory Nurs Pract 2002; 16: 19-31
5 McFarland KF, Rhoads DR, Campbell J, Finch WH. Meaning of illness and health outcomes in type 1 diabetes. Endocr Pract 2001; 7: 250-255
6 Chan YM, Molassiotis A. The relationship between diabetes knowledge and compliance among Chinese with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in Hong Kong. J Adv Nurs 1998; 30: 431-438
7 Koch T, Kralik D, Sonnack D. Women living with type 2 diabetes: The intrusion of illness. J Clin Nurs 1999; 8: 712-722
8 McDonald PE, Tilley BC, Havstad SL. Nurses' perceptions: Issues that arise in caring for patients with diabetes. J Adv Nurs 1999; 30: 425-430
9 Rose M, Fliege H, Hildebrandt M, Schirop T, Klapp BF. The network of psychological variables in patients with diabetes and their importance for quality of life and metabolic control. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 35-42
10 Skinner TC, Cradock S, Arundel F, Graham W. Four theories and a philosophy: Self-management education for individuals newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Spectrum 2003; 15: 75-80
11 Thorne SE, Harris SR, Mahoney K, Con A, McGuinness L. The context of health care communication in chronic illness. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 54: 299-306
12 Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, Rätsep A, Levasseur G, Petek D, van Dam H. et al. Obstances to adherence in living with type 2 diabetes: An international qualitative study using meta-ethnography. Prim Care Diabetes 2007; 1: 25-33
13 Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3^rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002
14 Denzin N, Lincoln Y. Handbook of qualitative research. 2^nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2000
15 Marshall C, Rossman G. Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1999
16 Glesne C. Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. 4^th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education; 2011
17 Creswell JW, Plano-Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2^nd ed. New Delhi: Sage Publications; 2011
18 Milstrey-Wells S. A delicate balance: Living successfully with chronic illness. New York: Perseus Publishing; 2000