CC BY 4.0 · Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2019; 41(01): 053-058
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676511
Review Article
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Use of the Pessary in the Prevention of Preterm Delivery

Uso do pessário na prevenção de parto pretermo
Thayane Delazari Corrêa
1   Departament of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
,
Ester Gomes Amorim
1   Departament of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
,
Jade Aimée Guimarães Tomazelli
1   Departament of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
,
1   Departament of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 August 2018

22 October 2018

Publication Date:
04 February 2019 (online)

Abstract

Objective The gestational complication most associated with perinatal mortality and morbidity is spontaneous preterm birth with gestational age < 37 weeks. Therefore, it is necessary to identify its risk factors and attempt its prevention. The benefits of the pessary in prematurity are under investigation. Our objective was to analyze the use of the pessary in the prevention of preterm births in published studies, and to compare its efficacy with other methods.

Methods Randomized clinical trials published between 2010 and 2018 were selected from electronic databases. Studies on multiple gestations were excluded.

Results Two studies were in favor of the pessary as a preventive method, one study was contrary to the method and another two showed no statistically significant difference. The meta-analysis showed no statistical difference with the use of a cervical pessary in the reduction of births < 37 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.63; confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.38–1.06) and < 34 weeks (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.35–1.57)

Conclusion The pooled data available to date seems to show a lack of efficacy of the cervical pessary in the prevention of preterm birth, although the heterogeneity of the studies made comparisons more difficult.

Resumo

Objetivo O parto com idade gestacional < 37 semanas é a complicação gestacional mais associada à mortalidade e morbidade perinatal, sendo necessária a identificação de seus fatores de risco e a tentativa de sua prevenção. Os benefícios do pessário na prematuridade estão sendo investigados. Nosso objetivo foi analisar os estudos publicados sobre uso do pessário na prevenção do parto pretermo e comparar sua eficácia perante outros métodos.

Métodos Foram selecionados estudos clínicos randomizados publicados entre 2010 e 2018, extraídos de bases eletrônicas de dados. Estudos de gestações múltiplas foram excluídos.

Resultados Dois estudos se mostraram a favor do pessário como método preventivo, um estudo foi contrário ao método, e outros dois não demonstraram diferença estatisticamente significativa. A meta-análise não mostrou diferença significativa no uso do pessário na redução de nascimentos < 37 (razão de chance [RC]: 0,63; intervalo de confiança [IC 95%]: 0,38–1,06) e < 34 semanas (RC: 0,74; IC 95%: 0,35–1,57).

Conclusão Os dados agrupados disponíveis até o momento parecem mostrar uma falta de eficácia do pessário cervical na prevenção do parto pretermo, embora a heterogeneidade dos estudos tenha dificultado as comparações.

 
  • References

  • 1 Saccone G, Maruotti GM, Giudicepietro A, Martinelli P. ; Italian Preterm Birth Prevention (IPP) Working Group. Effect of cervical pessary on spontaneous preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies and short cervical length: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017; 318 (23) 2317-2324 . Doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18956
  • 2 Goya M, Pratcorona L, Merced C. , et al; Pesario Cervical para Evitar Prematuridad (PECEP) Trial Group. Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379 (9828): 1800-1806 . Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60030-0
  • 3 Nicolaides KH, Syngelaki A, Poon LC. , et al. A randomized trial of a cervical pessary to prevent preterm singleton birth. N Engl J Med 2016; 374 (11) 1044-1052 . Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511014
  • 4 Karbasian N, Sheikh M, Pirjani R, Hazrati S, Tara F, Hantoushzadeh S. Combined treatment with cervical pessary and vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth: A randomized clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2016; 42 (12) 1673-1679 . Doi: 10.1111/jog.13138
  • 5 Cruz-Melguizo S, San-Frutos L, Martínez-Payo C. , et al. Cervical pessary compared with vaginal progesterone for preventing early preterm birth: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132 (04) 907-915 . Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002884
  • 6 Suhag A, Berghella V. Cervical cerclage. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2014; 57 (03) 557-567 . Doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000044
  • 7 Cross RG. Treatment of habitual abortion due to cervical incompetence. Lancet 1959; 274: 127 . Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(59)92242-1
  • 8 Abdel-Aleem H, Shaaban OM, Abdel-Aleem MA. Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (05) CD007873 . Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007873.pub3
  • 9 Hui SYA, Chor CM, Lau TK, Lao TT, Leung TY. Cerclage pessary for preventing preterm birth in women with a singleton pregnancy and a short cervix at 20 to 24 weeks: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30 (04) 283-288 . Doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1322550
  • 10 ARABIN® Cerclage Pessar perforiert. https://dr-arabin.de/produkt/arabin-cerclage-pessar-perforiert/ . Accessed September 25, 2018
  • 11 Pessário Parto Prematuro. 2015. http://www.ingamed.com.br/produtos-detalhe/51/pessario-parto-prematuro . Accessed September 25, 2018
  • 12 Daskalakis G, Zacharakis D, Theodora M. , et al. Safety and efficacy of the cervical pessary combined with vaginal progesterone for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth. J Perinat Med 2018; 46 (05) 531-537 . Doi: 10.1515/jpm-2017-0009
  • 13 Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.10. The Cochrane Colaboration; 2011. http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/ . Accessed September 15, 2018
  • 14 Saccone G, Ciardulli A, Xodo S. , et al. Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancies with short cervical length: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ultrasound Med 2017; 36 (08) 1535-1543 . Doi: 10.7863/ultra.16.08054
  • 15 Alfirevic Z, Owen J, Carreras Moratonas E, Sharp AN, Szychowski JM, Goya M. Vaginal progesterone, cerclage or cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in asymptomatic singleton pregnant women with a history of preterm birth and a sonographic short cervix. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41 (02) 146-151 . Doi: 10.1002/uog.12300
  • 16 Norman JE, Marlow N, Messow CM. , et al; OPPTIMUM study group. Vaginal progesterone prophylaxis for preterm birth (the OPPTIMUM study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet 2016; 387 (10033): 2106-2116 . Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00350-0
  • 17 Hassan SS, Romero R, Vidyadhari D. , et al; PREGNANT Trial. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38 (01) 18-31 . Doi: 10.1002/uog.9017
  • 18 Arabin B, Halbesma JR, Vork F, Hübener M, van Eyck J. Is treatment with vaginal pessaries an option in patients with a sonographically detected short cervix?. J Perinat Med 2003; 31 (02) 122-133 . Doi: 10.1515/JPM.2003.017