J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80(05): 518-526
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1676512
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Deconstruction of the Surgical Approach to the Jugular Foramen Region: Anatomical Study

Jaafar Basma
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
2   Medical Education Research Institute, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
,
L. Madison Michael II
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
2   Medical Education Research Institute, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
3   Semmes-Murphey Clinic, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
,
Jeffrey M. Sorenson
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
2   Medical Education Research Institute, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
3   Semmes-Murphey Clinic, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
,
Jon H. Robertson
1   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
2   Medical Education Research Institute, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
3   Semmes-Murphey Clinic, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

06 August 2018

25 October 2018

Publication Date:
07 December 2018 (online)

Abstract

Introduction The jugular foramen occupies a complex and deep location between the skull base and the distal-lateral-cervical region. We propose a morphometric anatomical model to deconstruct its surgical anatomy and offer various quantifiable target-guided exposures and angles-of-attack.

Methods Six cadaveric heads (12 sides) were dissected using a combined postauricular infralabyrinthine and distal transcervical approach with additional anterior transstyloid and posterior far lateral exposures. We identified anatomical landmarks and combined new and previously described contiguous triangles to expose the region; we defined the jugular and deep condylar triangles. Angles-of-attack to the jugular foramen were measured after removing the digastric muscle, styloid process, rectus capitis lateralis, and occipital condyle.

Results Removing the digastric muscle and styloid process allowed 86.4° laterally and 85.5° anteriorly, respectively. Resecting the rectus capitis lateralis and jugular process provided the largest angle-of-attack (108.4° posteriorly). The occipital condyle can be drilled in the deep condylar triangle only adding 30.4° medially. A purely lateral approach provided a total of 280.3°. Cutting the jugular ring and mobilizing the vein can further expand the medial exposure.

Conclusion The microsurgical anatomy of the jugular foramen can be deconstructed using a morphometric model, permitting a surgical approach customized to the pathology of interest.

 
  • References

  • 1 Al-Mefty O, Teixeira A. Complex tumors of the glomus jugulare: criteria, treatment, and outcome. J Neurosurg 2002; 97 (06) 1356-1366
  • 2 Sekhar LN, Schramm Jr VL, Jones NF. Subtemporal-preauricular infratemporal fossa approach to large lateral and posterior cranial base neoplasms. J Neurosurg 1987; 67 (04) 488-499
  • 3 Fortes FS, da Silva ES, Sennes LU. Mandibular subluxation for distal cervical exposure of the internal carotid artery. Laryngoscope 2007; 117 (05) 890-893
  • 4 Pellegrini RV, Manzetti GW, DiMarco RF, Bekoe S, Arena SA, Marrangoni AG. The direct surgical management of lesions of the high internal carotid artery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1984; 25 (01) 29-35
  • 5 Kumins NH, Tober JC, Larsen PE, Smead WL. Vertical ramus osteotomy allows exposure of the distal internal carotid artery to the base of the skull. Ann Vasc Surg 2001; 15 (01) 25-31
  • 6 Fisch U. Infratemporal fossa approach to tumours of the temporal bone and base of the skull. J Laryngol Otol 1978; 92 (11) 949-967
  • 7 Gardner G, Cocke Jr EW, Robertson JT, Trumbull ML, Palmer RE. Combined approach surgery for removal of glomus jugulare tumors. Laryngoscope 1977; 87 (5 Pt 1): 665-688
  • 8 Rhoton Jr AL. Jugular foramen. Neurosurgery 2000; 47 (3, Suppl): S267-S285
  • 9 George B, Tran PB. Surgical resection of jugulare foramen tumors by juxtacondylar approach without facial nerve transposition. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000; 142 (06) 613-620
  • 10 George B, Lot G, Tran Ba Huy P. The juxtacondylar approach to the jugular foramen (without petrous bone drilling). Surg Neurol 1995; 44 (03) 279-284
  • 11 Matsushima T, Natori Y, Katsuta T, Ikezaki K, Fukui M, Rhoton AL. Microsurgical anatomy for lateral approaches to the foramen magnum with special reference to transcondylar fossa (supracondylar transjugular tubercle) approach. Skull Base Surg 1998; 8 (03) 119-125
  • 12 Liu JK, Sameshima T, Gottfried ON, Couldwell WT, Fukushima T. The combined transmastoid retro- and infralabyrinthine transjugular transcondylar transtubercular high cervical approach for resection of glomus jugulare tumors. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (01) (Suppl. 01) ONS115-ONS125 , discussion ONS115–ONS125
  • 13 Matsushima K, Kohno M, Komune N, Miki K, Matsushima T, Rhoton Jr AL. Suprajugular extension of the retrosigmoid approach: microsurgical anatomy. J Neurosurg 2014; 121 (02) 397-407
  • 14 Wen HT, Rhoton Jr AL, Katsuta T, de Oliveira E. Microsurgical anatomy of the transcondylar, supracondylar, and paracondylar extensions of the far-lateral approach. J Neurosurg 1997; 87 (04) 555-585
  • 15 Spektor S, Anderson GJ, McMenomey SO, Horgan MA, Kellogg JX, Delashaw Jr JB. Quantitative description of the far-lateral transcondylar transtubercular approach to the foramen magnum and clivus. J Neurosurg 2000; 92 (05) 824-831
  • 16 Salas E, Sekhar LN, Ziyal IM, Caputy AJ, Wright DC. Variations of the extreme-lateral craniocervical approach: anatomical study and clinical analysis of 69 patients. J Neurosurg 1999; 90 (2, Suppl): 206-219
  • 17 Dallan I, Bignami M, Battaglia P, Castelnuovo P, Tschabitscher M. Fully endoscopic transnasal approach to the jugular foramen: anatomic study and clinical considerations. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (3, Suppl Operative): ons1-ons7 , discussion ons7–ons8
  • 18 Komune N, Matsushima K, Matsushima T, Komune S, Rhoton Jr AL. Surgical approaches to jugular foramen schwannomas: an anatomic study. Head Neck 2016; 38 (Suppl. 01) E1041-E1053
  • 19 Michael LM, Hamm W, Robertson JH. Surgical Management of Intracranial Glomus Tumors. In: Badie B. , ed. Neurosurgical Operative Atlas: Neuro-Oncology. 2nd edition. New York: Thieme; 2006: 251-259
  • 20 Neurosurgery AANS. The Postauricular Transtemporal Approach to the Jugular Foramen. [Video]. 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijR1wR4xvrI"> . Accessed June 6, 2018
  • 21 Nelson RA. Temporal Bone Surgical Dissection Manual. Los Angeles, CA: House Ear Institute; 1983
  • 22 Baron EM, Tunstall R. Back. In: Standring S. , ed. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 41st edition. New York: Elsevier; 2016: 710-750
  • 23 Heros RC. Lateral suboccipital approach for vertebral and vertebrobasilar artery lesions. J Neurosurg 1986; 64 (04) 559-562
  • 24 Cohen MA, Evins AI, Lapadula G, Arko L, Stieg PE, Bernardo A. The rectus capitis lateralis and the condylar triangle: important landmarks in posterior and lateral approaches to the jugular foramen. J Neurosurg 2017; 127 (06) 1398-1406
  • 25 Wanibuchi M, Friedman AH, Fukushima T. Photo Atlas of Skull Base Dissection: Techniques and Operative Approaches. New York, NY: Thieme; 2008
  • 26 Rouvière H. Anatomie humaine: descriptive, topographique et fonctionnelle [Human Anatomy: Descriptive, Topographic and Functional] Vol 1: Tête et cou [Head and Neck]. 11th edition. Paris: Masson; 1981
  • 27 Beretta F, Hemida SA, Andaluz N, Zuccarello M, Keller JT. Exposure of the cervical internal carotid artery: surgical steps to the cranial base and morphometric study. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (01) (Suppl. 01) ONS25-ONS34 , discussion ONS25–ONS34
  • 28 Izci Y, Moftakhar R, Pyle M, Başkaya MK. Retromandibular fossa approach to the high cervical internal carotid artery: an anatomic study. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (05) (Suppl. 02) ONS363-ONS369 , discussion 369–370