RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00000181.xml
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2019; 80(02): 139-148
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677690
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677690
Invited Review
Bone Conduction Implants for Hearing Rehabilitation in Skull Base Tumor Patients
Weitere Informationen
Publikationsverlauf
26. November 2018
05. Dezember 2018
Publikationsdatum:
06. Februar 2019 (online)
Abstract
Bone conduction implants transfer sound to the inner ear through direct vibration of the skull. In patients with skull base tumors and infections, these devices can bypass a dysfunctional ear canal and/or middle ear. Though not all skull base surgery patients opt for bone conduction hearing rehabilitation, a variety of these devices have been developed and marketed over time. This article reviews the evolution and existing state of bone conduction technology.
Financial Material and Support
Internal departmental funding was utilized without commercial sponsorship or support.
Disclosure
This article discusses off-label uses of bone-conduction hearing devices.
-
References
- 1 Ng M, Jackler RK. Early history of tuning-fork tests. Am J Otol 1993; 14 (01) 100-105
- 2 Berger KW. Early bone conduction hearing aid devices. Arch Otolaryngol 1976; 102 (05) 315-318
- 3 Tjellström A, Lindström J, Hallén O, Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI. Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 1981; 2 (04) 304-310
- 4 Bonding P, Jønsson MH, Salomon G, Ahlgren P. The bone-anchored hearing aid. Osseointegration and audiological effect. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1992; 492: 42-45
- 5 Mylanus EA, Cremers CW, Snik AF, van den Berge NW. Clinical results of percutaneous implants in the temporal bone. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 120 (01) 81-85
- 6 Mylanus EA, Cremers CW. A one-stage surgical procedure for placement of percutaneous implants for the bone-anchored hearing aid. J Laryngol Otol 1994; 108 (12) 1031-1035
- 7 den Besten CA, Bosman AJ, Nelissen RC, Mylanus EA, Hol MK. Controlled clinical trial on bone-anchored hearing implants and a surgical technique with soft-tissue preservation. Otol Neurotol 2016; 37 (05) 504-512
- 8 Høgsbro M, Agger A, Johansen LV. Bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: randomized trial of dermatome versus linear incision without soft tissue reduction--clinical measures. Otol Neurotol 2015; 36 (05) 805-811
- 9 A bone conduction hearing solution: surgery guide. Available from: https://www.cochlear.com/66b43e66-3e0b-453b-9751-bc904f3961fd/BUN128+ISS4+NOV30+-+Baha+Connect+Surgery+Guide+FINAL.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CONVERT_TO=url&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-66b43e66-3e0b-453b-9751-bc904f3961fd-llOXgkw . Accessed May, 2018
- 10 Gordon SA, Coelho DH. Minimally invasive surgery for osseointegrated auditory implants: a comparison of linear versus punch techniques. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 152 (06) 1089-1093
- 11 Calon TGA, Johansson ML, de Bruijn AJG. , et al. Minimally invasive ponto surgery versus the linear incision technique with soft tissue preservation for bone conduction hearing implants: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39 (07) 882-893
- 12 Kiringoda R, Lustig LR. A meta-analysis of the complications associated with osseointegrated hearing aids. Otol Neurotol 2013; 34 (05) 790-794
- 13 Iseri M, Orhan KS, Tuncer U. , et al. Transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids versus percutaneous ones: multicenter comparative clinical study. Otol Neurotol 2015; 36 (05) 849-853
- 14 Cass SP, Mudd PA. Bone-anchored hearing devices: indications, outcomes, and the linear surgical technique. Oper Tech Otolaryngol--Head Neck Surg 2010; 21 (03) 197-206
- 15 Hol MK, Nelissen RC, Agterberg MJ, Cremers CW, Snik AF. Comparison between a new implantable transcutaneous bone conductor and percutaneous bone-conduction hearing implant. Otol Neurotol 2013; 34 (06) 1071-1075
- 16 Dimitriadis PA, Hind D, Wright K. , et al. Single-center experience of over a hundred implantations of a transcutaneous bone conduction device. Otol Neurotol 2017; 38 (09) 1301-1307
- 17 Reinfeldt S, Håkansson B, Taghavi H, Eeg-Olofsson M. New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review. Med Devices (Auckl) 2015; 8: 79-93
- 18 Hol MK, Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW. Does the bone-anchored hearing aid have a complementary effect on audiological and subjective outcomes in patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss?. Audiol Neurotol 2005; 10 (03) 159-168
- 19 Stenfelt S. Acoustic and physiologic aspects of bone conduction hearing. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 71: 10-21
- 20 Davids T, Gordon KA, Clutton D, Papsin BC. Bone-anchored hearing aids in infants and children younger than 5 years. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 133 (01) 51-55
- 21 Nader ME, Beadle BM, Roberts DB, Gidley PW. Outcomes and complications of osseointegrated hearing aids in irradiated temporal bones. Laryngoscope 2016; 126 (05) 1187-1192
- 22 Lloyd S, Almeyda J, Sirimanna KS, Albert DM, Bailey CM. Updated surgical experience with bone-anchored hearing aids in children. J Laryngol Otol 2007; 121 (09) 826-831
- 23 Briggs R, Van Hasselt A, Luntz M. , et al. Clinical performance of a new magnetic bone conduction hearing implant system: results from a prospective, multicenter, clinical investigation. Otol Neurotol 2015; 36 (05) 834-841
- 24 Doshi J, Schneiders S, Foster K, Reid A, McDermott AL. Magnetic resonance imaging and bone anchored hearing implants: pediatric considerations. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 78 (02) 277-279
- 25 Cochlear Baha 5 Power datasheet. Availablr from: https://www.cochlear.com/94d60676-a488-44da-a683-3202d592a300/BUN446_Rev1_Baha_5_Power_Comparison_Chart.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=llPYtaQ&CVID=llPYtaQ . Accessed April, 2018
- 26 Cochlear Baha Connect System and Cochlear Baha Attract system datasheet. Available from: https://www.cochlear.com/b9c07811-205c-4c38-98f4-4f539315ab35/BUN397+ISS1+JAN16+SuperPower+Connect+Attract+Datasheet.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CONVERT_TO=url&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-b9c07811-205c-4c38-98f4-4f539315ab35-llOYl50 . Accessed April, 2018
- 27 Product Specification: Sophono Alpha 2 MPO Processor. http://professionals.sophono.com/hubfs/May_2016_-_Product_Literature/UC201603289aEN_Sophono_Magnetic_ProductSpecs_LR.pdf?t=1472051684526&hsCtaTracking=9f95e98f-d725-4fc0-8ac0-652901a8f2ca%7Cba067687-e951-45eb-9867-35b6ebde3381 . Accessed April, 2018
- 28 Ponto 3, Ponto 3 Power and Ponto 3 SuperPower product information. https://www.oticonmedical.com/-/media/medical/main/files/bahs/products/ponto-3/pi/eng/ponto-3-product-information—m52682—english.pdf?la=en . Accessed April, 2018
- 29 Zernotti ME, Di Gregorio MF, Galeazzi P, Tabernero P. Comparative outcomes of active and passive hearing devices by transcutaneous bone conduction. Acta Otolaryngol 2016; 136 (06) 556-558
- 30 Schmerber S, Deguine O, Marx M. , et al. Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274 (04) 1835-1851
- 31 Doshi J, Sheehan P, McDermott AL. Bone anchored hearing aids in children: an update. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 76 (05) 618-622
- 32 Verstraeten N, Zarowski AJ, Somers T, Riff D, Offeciers EF. Comparison of the audiologic results obtained with the bone-anchored hearing aid attached to the headband, the testband, and to the “snap” abutment. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30 (01) 70-75
- 33 MED-EL ADHEAR. Available from: http://www.medel.com/us/adhear/ . Accessed May, 2018
- 34 Dun CA, Faber HT, de Wolf MJ, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW, Hol MK. Assessment of more than 1,000 implanted percutaneous bone conduction devices: skin reactions and implant survival. Otol Neurotol 2012; 33 (02) 192-198
- 35 Reddy-Kolanu R, Gan R, Marshall AH. A case series of a magnetic bone conduction hearing implant. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2016; 98 (08) 552-553
- 36 Bezdjian A, Bruijnzeel H, Daniel SJ, Grolman W, Thomeer HGXM. Preliminary audiologic and peri-operative outcomes of the Sophono transcutaneous bone conduction device: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 101: 196-203
- 37 Johansson ML, Stokroos RJ, Banga R. , et al. Short-term results from seventy-six patients receiving a bone-anchored hearing implant installed with a novel minimally invasive surgery technique. Clin Otolaryngol 2017; 42 (05) 1043-1048
- 38 Snik AF, Bosman AJ, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW. Candidacy for the bone-anchored hearing aid. Audiol Neurotol 2004; 9 (04) 190-196
- 39 Baguley DM, Bird J, Humphriss RL, Prevost AT. The evidence base for the application of contralateral bone anchored hearing aids in acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in adults. Clin Otolaryngol 2006; 31 (01) 6-14
- 40 Nelissen RC, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW, Hol MK, Snik AF. Long-term compliance and satisfaction with percutaneous bone conduction devices in patients with congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2015; 36 (05) 826-833
- 41 House JW, Kutz Jr JW. Bone-anchored hearing aids: incidence and management of postoperative complications. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28 (02) 213-217
- 42 Boucek J, Vokral J, Cerny L. , et al. Baha implant as a hearing solution for single-sided deafness after retrosigmoid approach for the vestibular schwannoma: surgical results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274 (06) 2429-2436
- 43 McRackan TR, Goddard JC, Wilkinson EP, Slattery WH, Brackmann DE. Bone-anchored hearing device placement with translabyrinthine tumor removal. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 152 (02) 314-318
- 44 Wang R, Pillai K, Jones PK. Dosimetric measurement of scattered radiation from dental implants in simulated head and neck radiotherapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13 (02) 197-203
- 45 Fritsch MH, Naumann IC, Mosier KM. BAHA devices and magnetic resonance imaging scanners. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29 (08) 1095-1099
- 46 Cochlear Baha Connect System: radiographer's instructions. Available from: https://www.cochlear.com/107fc39f-bf96-47b6-9527-7d603b654344/BUN380+ISS1+AUG15+Radiographers+Instructions.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CONVERT_TO=url&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-107fc39f-bf96-47b6-9527-7d603b654344-l5vfKmC . Accessed May, 2018
- 47 Cochlear Baha Attract System: radiographer's instructions. Available from: https://www.cochlear.com/f5917ef2-bb35-4307-b330-8c15ffdd993c/BUN264+ISS2+APR15+Baha+Attract+Radiographers+Instructions+for+MRI.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CONVERT_TO=url&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-f5917ef2-bb35-4307-b330-8c15ffdd993c-l5veV.x . Accessed 11/2018
- 48 Kim BG, Kim JW, Park JJ, Kim SH, Kim HN, Choi JY. Adverse events and discomfort during magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant recipients. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 141 (01) 45-52
- 49 Syms MJ, Hernandez KE. Bone conduction hearing: device auditory capability to aid in device selection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 150 (05) 866-871
- 50 Murray M, Popelka GR, Miller R. Efficacy and safety of an in-the-mouth bone conduction device for single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 2011; 32 (03) 437-443
- 51 Murray M, Miller R, Hujoel P, Popelka GR. Long-term safety and benefit of a new intraoral device for single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol 2011; 32 (08) 1262-1269