A Nationwide Analysis of Preoperative Planning on Operative Times and Postoperative Complications in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

Compared with nonelective total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), elective procedures have more time for preoperative planning, which allows for potentially improved patient optimization, risk factor modification, and patient education. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine nationwide trends in operative times and (2) evaluate associations between surgery type, elective or nonelective, with respect to (a) operative times, (b) length of stay (LOS), (c) discharge dispositions, (d) 30-day postoperative complications, (e) reoperations, and (f) readmissions. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for all primary TKAs performed between 2011 and 2016. This yielded 209,178 cases which were stratified into elective and nonelective cases. Elective cases were those in which patients were brought from their normal living environment for scheduled procedures. One-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) was used to evaluate associations between operative times and year of surgery. Multivariate linear and logistic regression models adjusted for surgery year and patient factors (age, sex, BMI [body mass index], and ASA [American Society of Anesthesiologists] score) were used to evaluate associations of surgery type with peri- and postoperative outcomes. A significant inverse correlation between operative times and operative year was observed (p < 0.001). Mean operative times and LOS were significantly shorter in elective cases compared with nonelective cases (93 vs. 112 minutes, p < 0.005; 3 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed these associations remained significant even after adjusting for potential confounders (p < 0.001). Compared with the nonelective cohort, patients in the elective cohort were more likely to be discharged home (74 vs. 69%, p < 0.001). Nonelective patients had higher rates of pneumonia (0.7 vs. 0.3%, p = 0.005), organ-space surgical site infections (SSI; 0.4 vs. 0.2%, p = 0.004), transfusions (10.9 vs. 6.5%, p < 0.001), sepsis (0.6 vs. 0.2%, p = 0.001), and septic shock (0.2 vs. 0.1%, p = 0.005) compared with elective patients. These associations remained significant with multivariate logistic regression. This study demonstrated that preoperative planning can help shorten operative times and LOS as well as reduce complication and reoperation rates. Alongside the direct advantages identified in this study, potential greater effects include superior patient outcomes and reduced health care costs.

Keywords

preoperative planning - elective - nonelective - TKA - outcomes

• References

• 1 Cook JR, Warren M, Ganley KJ, Prefontaine P, Wylie JW. A comprehensive joint replacement program for total knee arthroplasty: a descriptive study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 154
• 2 Tanzer M, Makhdom AM. Preoperative planning in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016; 24 (04) 220-230
• 3 Unnanuntana A, Arunakul M, Unnanuntana A. The accuracy of preoperative templating in total knee arthroplasty. J Med Assoc Thai 2007; 90 (11) 2338-2343
• 4 Hsu AR, Gross CE, Bhatia S, Levine BR. Template-directed instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: cost savings analysis. Orthopedics 2012; 35 (11) e1596-e1600
• 5 Kniesel B, Konstantinidis L, Hirschmüller A, Südkamp N, Helwig P. Digital templating in total knee and hip replacement: an analysis of planning accuracy. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (04) 733-739
• 6 McLawhorn AS, Carroll KM, Blevins JL, DeNegre ST, Mayman DJ, Jerabek SA. Template-directed instrumentation reduces cost and improves efficiency for total knee arthroplasty: an economic decision analysis and pilot study. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (10) 1699-1704
• 7 Barbieri A, Vanhaecht K, Van Herck P. , et al. Effects of clinical pathways in the joint replacement: a meta-analysis. BMC Med 2009; 7: 32
• 8 McDonald S, Hetrick SE, Green S. Preoperative Education for Hip or Knee Replacement (Review). Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2004: CD003526
• 9 Pugely AJ, Callaghan JJ, Martin CT, Cram P, Gao Y. Incidence of and risk factors for 30-day readmission following elective primary total joint arthroplasty: analysis from the ACS-NSQIP. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (09) 1499-1504
• 10 Daley BJ, Cecil W, Clarke PC, Cofer JB, Guillamondegui OD. How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: an analysis from the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 220 (04) 550-558
• 11 Elkan P, Sjövie Hasserius J, Gerdhem P. Similar result after non-elective and elective surgery for lumbar disc herniation: an observational study based on the SweSpine register. Eur Spine J 2016; 25 (05) 1460-1466
• 12 Balachandran R, Tøttrup A. Safety of proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis under elective and non-elective circumstances: preoperative corticosteroid treatment worsens outcome. Dig Surg 2015; 32 (04) 251-257
• 13 Putnam LR, Anderson KT, Tsao K. , et al. The impact of cardiac risk factors on short-term outcomes for children undergoing a Ladd procedure. J Pediatr Surg 2017; 52 (03) 390-394