Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35(02): 176-181
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1681069
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Optimizing Results of Facial Surgery and Patient Satisfaction with Simultaneous Chemical Peels

Catherine Winslow
1   Department of Facial Plastic Surgery, Winslow Facial Plastic Surgery, Carmel, Indiana
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
03. April 2019 (online)

Abstract

Facial antiaging surgery is widely regarded as safe and effective. Current techniques allow us to achieve a balance of restoring youth while minimizing stigmata of surgery to effect a refreshed, natural look. An important component of achieving this goal is to improve the appearance of fine lines and dyschromias which continue to add to the apparent age. Several options exist to improve the appearance of the skin, each with a separate set of indications, advantages, and disadvantages. A medium-depth 35% trichloroacetic acid peel can be safely combined with rejuvenating surgery to enhance patient satisfaction and results with the same downtime and low cost.

 
  • References

  • 1 Swanson E. Objective assessment of change in apparent age after facial rejuvenation surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64 (09) 1124-1131
  • 2 Han SH, Kim HJ, Kim SY, Kim YC, Choi GS, Shin JH. Skin rejuvenating effects of chemical peeling: a study in photoaged hairless mice. Int J Dermatol 2011; 50 (09) 1075-1082
  • 3 Moy LS, Kotler R, Lesser T. The histologic evaluation of pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing versus phenol chemical peels in vivo. Dermatol Surg 1999; 25 (08) 597-600
  • 4 Brackup AB. Combined cervicofacial rhytidectomy and laser skin resurfacing. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 18 (01) 24-39
  • 5 Wojno T, Tenzel RR. Lower eyelid ectropion following chemical face peeling. Ophthalmic Surg 1984; 15 (07) 596-597
  • 6 Wright EJ, Struck SK. Facelift combined with simultaneous fractional laser resurfacing: outcomes and complications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (10) 1332-1337
  • 7 You HJ, Kim DW, Yoon ES, Park SH. Comparison of four different lasers for acne scars: resurfacing and fractional lasers. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (04) e87-e95
  • 8 Fulton JE. Simultaneous face lifting and skin resurfacing. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (07) 2480-2489
  • 9 Kaye KO, Schaller HE, Jaminet P, Gonser P. The PAVE (peeling-assisted volume-enhancing) lift: a retrospective 6-year clinical analysis of a combined approach for facial rejuvenation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (08) 1128-1133
  • 10 Poulos E, Taylor C, Solish N. Effectiveness of dermasanding (manual dermabrasion) on the appearance of surgical scars: a prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48 (06) 897-900
  • 11 Vagotis FL, Brundage SR. Histologic study of dermabrasion and chemical peel in an animal model after pretreatment with Retin-A. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1995; 19 (03) 243-246
  • 12 Mandy SH. Tretinoin in the preoperative and postoperative management of dermabrasion. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986; 15 (4 Pt 2): 878-879 , 888–889
  • 13 Effron C, Briden ME, Green BA. Enhancing cosmetic outcomes by combining superficial glycolic acid (alpha-hydroxy acid) peels with nonablative lasers, intense pulsed light, and trichloroacetic acid peels. Cutis 2007; 79 (1, Suppl Combining): 4-8
  • 14 El-Domyati MB, Attia SK, Saleh FY, Ahmad HM, Uitto JJ. Trichloroacetic acid peeling versus dermabrasion: a histometric, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural comparison. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30 (2 Pt 1): 179-188
  • 15 Hantash BM, Stewart DB, Cooper ZA, Rehmus WE, Koch RJ, Swetter SM. Facial resurfacing for nonmelanoma skin cancer prophylaxis. Arch Dermatol 2006; 142 (08) 976-982
  • 16 Kohl E, Meierhöfer J, Koller M. , et al. Fractional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of rhytides and photoageing: a prospective study using profilometric analysis. Br J Dermatol 2014; 170 (04) 858-865