J Knee Surg 2020; 33(06): 589-592
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1681099
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Reliability of 3-m Backward Walk Test in Patients with Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Bayram Unver
1   School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Dokuz Eylul University, Balçova, Izmir, Turkey
,
Kevser Sevik
1   School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Dokuz Eylul University, Balçova, Izmir, Turkey
,
Haci Ahmet Yarar
1   School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Dokuz Eylul University, Balçova, Izmir, Turkey
,
Fatma Unver
2   School of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
,
Vasfi Karatosun
3   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Balçova, Izmir, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Funding We certify that no party having a direct interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on us or on any organization with which we are associated and, if applicable, we certify that all financial and material support for this research (e.g., NIH or NHS grants) and work are clearly identified in the title page of the article.
Further Information

Publication History

27 September 2018

22 January 2019

Publication Date:
12 March 2019 (online)

Abstract

The 3-m backward walk test (3MBWT) is used to evaluate neuromuscular control, proprioception, protective reflexes, fall risk, and balance. The aim of the present study was to determine the test–retest reliability of the 3MBWT in patients with primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Twenty-eight patients with primary TKA, operated by the same surgeon, were included in this study. Patients performed trials for 3MBWT twice on the same day. Between the first and second trials, patients waited for an hour on sitting position to prevent fatigue. The 3MBWT showed an excellent test–retest reliability in this study. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for 3MBWT was 0.97. The standard error of measurement and smallest real difference at the 95% confidence level for 3MBWT were 1.06 and 2.94, respectively. The 3MBWT has an excellent test–retest reliability in patients with primary TKA. It is an effective and reliable tool for measuring dynamic balance and participant falls. As a clinical test, the 3MBWT is easy to score, requires little space, has no cost, needs no special equipment, and can be applied in a short time as part of the routine medical examination.

 
  • References

  • 1 Si HB, Zeng Y, Zhong J. , et al. The effect of primary total knee arthroplasty on the incidence of falls and balance-related functions in patients with osteoarthritis. Sci Rep 2017; 7 (01) 16583
  • 2 Matsumoto H, Okuno M, Nakamura T, Yamamoto K, Osaki M, Hagino H. Incidence and risk factors for falling in patients after total knee arthroplasty compared to healthy elderly individuals. Yonago Acta Med 2014; 57 (04) 137-145
  • 3 Levinger P, Menz HB, Wee E, Feller JA, Bartlett JR, Bergman NR. Physiological risk factors for falls in people with knee osteoarthritis before and early after knee replacement surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (07) 1082-1089
  • 4 Schumacher J, Pientka L, Thiem U. [Age-related differences in functional tests to assess the risk of falling in patients with knee pain]. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2006; 39 (04) 283-287
  • 5 Carter V, Jain T, James J, Cornwall M, Aldrich A, de Heer HD. The 3-m backwards walk and retrospective falls: diagnostic accuracy of a novel clinical measure. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2019; 42 (04) 249-255
  • 6 Cameron ID, Gillespie LD, Robertson MC. , et al. Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities and hospitals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 12 (12) CD005465
  • 7 Sarac DC, Unver B, Cekmece S, Karatosun V. FRI0736-HPR Validity and reliability of performance tests assessing balance and fall risk in patients with total knee arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76: 1496-1497
  • 8 Thomas MA, Fast A. One step forward and two steps back: the dangers of walking backwards in therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 79 (05) 459-461
  • 9 Narin S, Unver B, Bakırhan S, Bozan O, Karatosun V. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the hospital for special surgery (HSS) knee score. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2014; 48 (03) 241-248
  • 10 Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 1990; 13 (04) 227-236
  • 11 Dobson F, Hinman RS, Roos EM. , et al. OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21 (08) 1042-1052
  • 12 Almeida GJ, Schroeder CA, Gil AB, Fitzgerald GK, Piva SR. Interrater reliability and validity of the stair ascend/descend test in subjects with total knee arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91 (06) 932-938
  • 13 Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Riddle DL, Hanna SE, Gollish JD. Assessing recovery and establishing prognosis following total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther 2008; 88 (01) 22-32
  • 14 Lusardi MM, Fritz S, Middleton A. , et al. Determining risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis using posttest probability. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2017; 40 (01) 1-36
  • 15 Fritz NE, Worstell AM, Kloos AD, Siles AB, White SE, Kegelmeyer DA. Backward walking measures are sensitive to age-related changes in mobility and balance. Gait Posture 2013; 37 (04) 593-597
  • 16 Masuda S, Suganuma K, Kaneko C. , et al. Prediction of Falls Using a 3-m Zigzag Walk Test. J Phys Ther Sci 2013; 25 (09) 1051-1054
  • 17 Abbasi-Bafghi H, Fallah-Yakhdani HR, Meijer OG. , et al. The effects of knee arthroplasty on walking speed: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012; 13: 66
  • 18 Laufer Y. Effect of age on characteristics of forward and backward gait at preferred and accelerated walking speed. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005; 60 (05) 627-632
  • 19 Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19 (01) 231-240