RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1681717
IS THERE AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE MAJOR PAPILLA MORPHOLOGY AND THE SIZE OF THE TERMINAL COMMON BILE DUCT? – A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
18. März 2019 (online)
Aims:
In endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), the risk of adverse events during precut is increased when the terminal bile duct (tBD) is not dilated. Some studies suggest that the major papilla morphology, particularly its width is determined by the prominence of the supra- and intra-duodenal portion of the tBD. The study aim was to assess if the terminal bile duct diameter can be determined by inspecting the major papilla morphology/width during duodenoscopy.
Methods:
Between July 2017 and January 2018, in 3 hospitals, all consecutive patients with naïve papilla referred for ERCP were eligible for enrollment. The transverse diameter (tD) of the papilla was measured using a comparative measurement technique (biopsy forceps) and a novel software (validity and reliability tested). The papilla morphology was classified into one of 4 groups: non-proeminent, proeminent, bulging, distorted. The tBD's diameter was measured in the distal 1 cm (cholangiogram acquired in supine/prone) in a workstation, by an independent researcher. Main outcome was evaluated using a Pearson correlation.
Results:
137 patients were included; 57 males (41.61%), median age of 78 years (26 – 99). The median tD of the papilla was 6 mm (IQR = 3 mm) and the median tBD's diameter was 8.07 mm (IQR = 4.87 mm). Half (50%) of the papillas were non-proeminent (tBD median = 7.66 mm; IQR = 4.473), 32.08% proeminent (tBD median = 8.05 mm; IQR = 4.869), 12.26% bulging (tBD median = 8.978 mm; IQR = 5.814) and 5.66% distorted (tBD median = 7.533 mm; IQR = 0.832); p-value [C2 = 2.237)] > 0.6923. The correlation between tD and tBD diameters was 0.0245.
Conclusions:
Despite what is suggested in the literature, the morphology and the width of the major papilla don't have any association with the diameter of the tBD, and consequently these two dimensions should not be taken into account when deciding for a cannulation technique.