CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · AJP Rep 2019; 09(02): e153-e159
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1687872
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Timing of Antenatal Corticosteroid Administration in Monoamniotic Twins

Carolina Bibbo
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Sarah R. Easter
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Michael Saadeh
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Sarah E. Little
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Julian N. Robinson
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

07 December 2018

11 December 2018

Publication Date:
30 April 2019 (online)

Abstract

Objective This study was aimed to determine if different strategies of antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) administration in monoamniotic twins leads to receipt within 7 days of delivery.

Study Design This is a retrospective cohort of monoamniotic twins managed at a single institution from 2007 to 2017. Patients were classified as to whether ACS were administered upon admission or at a predetermined gestational age (grouped together as “routine”) or for a change in clinical status (“indicated”). We used univariate analyses to associate ACS administration strategies with our primary outcome: receipt of ACS within 7 days of delivery. We then used generalized estimating equations to examine associations between fetal monitoring patterns and delivery within 1 week.

Results Twenty-four patients were included: eighteen patients in the “routine” group and six patients in the “indicated” group. There was no difference in optimal timing of ACS administration. Women experiencing delivery within the week were thrice more likely to spend on average more than 3 hours/day on the fetal monitor when compared with those who remained undelivered.

Conclusion Administration of ACS on admission is not effective. Fetal heart rate tracing surveillance might be a better methodology to predict delivery and guide ACS administration.

Note

The study was performed at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.


Presentation

These findings were presented as a poster at the 38th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine in Dallas, TX; February 2018.


 
  • References

  • 1 Aisenbrey GA, Catanzarite VA, Hurley TJ, Spiegel JH, Schrimmer DB, Mendoza A. Monoamniotic and pseudomonoamniotic twins: sonographic diagnosis, detection of cord entanglement, and obstetric management. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86 (02) 218-222
  • 2 Slotnick RN, Ortega JE. Monoamniotic twinning and zona manipulation: a survey of U.S. IVF centers correlating zona manipulation procedures and high-risk twinning frequency. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996; 13 (05) 381-385
  • 3 Pasquini L, Wimalasundera RC, Fichera A, Barigye O, Chappell L, Fisk NM. High perinatal survival in monoamniotic twins managed by prophylactic sulindac, intensive ultrasound surveillance, and Cesarean delivery at 32 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28 (05) 681-687
  • 4 Dias T, Mahsud-Dornan S, Bhide A, Papageorghiou AT, Thilaganathan B. Cord entanglement and perinatal outcome in monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35 (02) 201-204
  • 5 Ezra Y, Shveiky D, Ophir E. , et al. Intensive management and early delivery reduce antenatal mortality in monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84 (05) 432-435
  • 6 Beasley E, Megerian G, Gerson A, Roberts NS. Monoamniotic twins: case series and proposal for antenatal management. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93 (01) 130-134
  • 7 Prefumo F, Fichera A, Pagani G, Marella D, Valcamonico A, Frusca T. The natural history of monoamniotic twin pregnancies: a case series and systematic review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35 (03) 274-280
  • 8 Shub A, Walker SP. Planned early delivery versus expectant management for monoamniotic twins. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (04) CD008820
  • 9 Heyborne KD, Porreco RP, Garite TJ, Phair K, Abril D. ; Obstetrix/Pediatrix Research Study Group. Improved perinatal survival of monoamniotic twins with intensive inpatient monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192 (01) 96-101
  • 10 DeFalco LM, Sciscione AC, Megerian G. , et al. Inpatient versus outpatient management of monoamniotic twins and outcomes. Am J Perinatol 2006; 23 (04) 205-211
  • 11 Van Mieghem T, De Heus R, Lewi L. , et al. Prenatal management of monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (03) 498-506
  • 12 Melamed N, Shah J, Yoon EW. , et al; Canadian Neonatal Network Investigators. The role of antenatal corticosteroids in twin pregnancies complicated by preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (04) 482.e1-482.e9
  • 13 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 144: Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (05) 1118-1132
  • 14 Roberts D, Brown J, Medley N, Dalziel SR. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3: CD004454
  • 15 Liggins GC, Howie RN. A controlled trial of antepartum glucocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Pediatrics 1972; 50 (04) 515-525
  • 16 Roberts D, Dalziel S. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (03) CD004454
  • 17 Palas D, Ehlinger V, Alberge C. , et al. Efficacy of antenatal corticosteroids in preterm twins: the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. BJOG 2018; 125 (09) 1164-1170
  • 18 Barrett JF, Hannah ME, Hutton EK. , et al; Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2013; 369 (14) 1295-1305
  • 19 Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 1988; 44 (04) 1049-1060
  • 20 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
  • 21 Murata M, Ishii K, Kamitomo M. , et al. Perinatal outcome and clinical features of monochorionic monoamniotic twin gestation. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013; 39 (05) 922-925
  • 22 Baxi LV, Walsh CA. Monoamniotic twins in contemporary practice: a single-center study of perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23 (06) 506-510
  • 23 Hack KE, Derks JB, Schaap AH. , et al. Perinatal outcome of monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (2 Pt 1): 353-360
  • 24 Post A, Heyborne K. Managing monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 58 (03) 643-653