Aesthetic Earlobe Reduction: A Practical Geometric Modification with Natural Contour Preservation

Abstract

Earlobe elongation is one of the signs of aging process and surgical correction is warranted for earlobe ptosis. Most of the earlobe reduction techniques result with scars on the anterior or inferior aspect of the earlobe or unnatural appearance. The authors present a modified technique for earlobe reduction and reshaping that results with an acceptable scar set on the natural groove of the anterior surface of the earlobe. Nine healthy female patients were operated for earlobe reduction. The postoperative and preoperative otobasion inferius (O)–subaurale (S) distances of these patients were evaluated. According to the measurements, the preoperative mean O–S distance of the right lobule was 13.1 ± 1.8 mm and the left lobule was 12.8 ± 1.9 mm, while the postoperative O–S distance of the right side was 3.4 ± 1 mm and the left side was 3.4 ± 0.7 mm ([Table 2]). This translated to an approximate pre- and postoperative O–S distance difference of 9 mm, a significant reduction that resulted with ideal O–S values. The presented approach has numerous advantages including inconspicuous scarring, smooth lateral earlobe contours, and undisturbed free borders. This was a Level IV therapeutic study.

Keywords

earlobe - earlobe reduction - earlobe ptosis - earlobe reshaping - earlobe surgery

• References

• 1 Zhao H, Ma L, Qi X. , et al. A morphometric study of the newborn ear and an analysis of factors related to congenital auricular deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (01) 147-155
• 2 Azaria R, Adler N, Silfen R, Regev D, Hauben DJ. Morphometry of the adult human earlobe: a study of 547 subjects and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (07) 2398-2402 , discussion 2403–2404
• 3 Mowlavi A, Meldrum DG, Wilhelmi BJ, Zook EG. Effect of face lift on earlobe ptosis and pseudoptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (04) 988-991
• 4 Lassus C. Another technique for the reduction of the earlobe. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1982; 6 (01) 43-45
• 5 Connell BF. Correcting deformities of the aged earlobe. Aesthet Surg J 2005; 25 (02) 194-196
• 6 Tipton JB. A simple technique for reduction of the earlobe. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66 (04) 630-632
• 7 Mowlavi A, Meldrum DG, Wilhelmi BJ, Ghavami A, Zook EG. The aesthetic earlobe: classification of lobule ptosis on the basis of a survey of North American Caucasians. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (01) 266-272 , discussion 273–274
• 8 Mowlavi A, Meldrum DG, Kalkanis J, Wilhelmi BJ, Russell RC, Zook EG. Surgical design and algorithm for correction of earlobe ptosis and pseudoptosis deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (01) 290-295
• 9 Tanzer RC. Congenital deformities of the auricle. In: Converse JM, ed. Reconstructive Plastic Surgery. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1977: 1719
• 10 Miller CC. Cosmetic Surgery: The Correction of Facial Features and Imperfections. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 1925
• 11 Loeb R. Correcao da hypertrofia da lobulo auricular. Rev a. Lat Am Chir Plast 1965; 9: 186
• 12 Stark RB. Plastic Surgery. New York: Hoeber Medical Division, Harper and Row; 1962: 256
• 13 McCoy FJ. Macrotia. In: Masters FW, Lewis JR. , eds. Symposium on Aesthetic Surgery of the Nose, Ears and Chin. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1973: 162
• 14 Van Putte L, Colpaert SD. Earlobe reduction with minimally visible scars: the sub-antitragal groove technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017; 41 (02) 335-338
• 15 Brothers RJ, Jahnke MN, Daveluy S. Exaggerated earlobe ptosis due to habitual ear pulling. JAMA Dermatol 2014; 150 (06) 673-674