J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35(08): 609-615
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1688748
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Latissimus Denervation: A Review of Evidence

Christopher D. Lopez
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York, United States
,
Franca Kraenzlin
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Christopher Frost
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Halley Darrach
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Pathik Aravind
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
,
Justin M. Sacks
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 November 2018

17 March 2019

Publication Date:
08 May 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background Breast reconstruction is becoming an increasingly important and accessible component of breast cancer care. Among the many reconstructive options available, the latissimus dorsi flap has experienced a renewal in popularity because of its favorable properties and outcomes when used for breast reconstruction. However, a limitation unique to latissimus-based reconstruction is inappropriate breast animation postoperatively, due to persistent thoracodorsal innervation of the latissimus dorsi muscle after transfer to the mastectomy site.

Methods A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted for studies investigating the role of thoracodorsal denervation in latissimus-based breast reconstruction. Data on surgical techniques, type of intervention, objective outcome measurements, and patient satisfaction-based outcomes were reported. Additional data included patient sample size, follow-up length, and treatment of thoracodorsal nerve (e.g., resection versus transection and length of transection) when applicable.

Results Sixty-six search results were reviewed for inclusion and nine qualified after exclusion criteria for a total of 361 patients undergoing either unilateral or bilateral latissimus flap reconstruction. Successful thoracodorsal denervation rates were included in most studies and outcomes measurements were heterogeneous. Eight out of nine studies included patient-reported symptoms of breast animation postoperatively. Based on these findings, a systematic approach is presented.

Conclusion We present this review to elucidate successful practices, identify current gaps in knowledge, and offer a systematic approach to this clinical challenge.