Outcome of Supraglenoid Tubercle Fractures in 12 Dogs

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to report the outcome and complications of surgical stabilization following fracture of the supraglenoid tubercle in dogs.

Materials and Methods Data from three referral centres (Queen Mother Hospital for Animals, Michigan State University and Veterinary Referral Hospital Hallam) were reviewed retrospectively for cases of supraglenoid tubercle fracture (n = 12).

Results Overall success rate was 9/12. Major complication rate was 2/12 and minor complication rate was 9/12. All fractures that had major complications were comminuted. Methods of stabilization included pin and tension band wire (n = 5), lag screw (n = 2), plate fixation (n = 2), fragment removal (n = 2) and conservative management (n = 1).

Clinical Significance Good outcomes can be achieved following fractures of the supraglenoid tubercle, although cases with comminution have a higher complication rate. Further research into the optimal method of fixation and postoperative management is required.

Keywords

fracture - scapula - supraglenoid tubercle - dog

Author Contribution

Elvin R. Kulendra contributed to conception of study, study design, acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. Andrew J. C. Beer contributed to study design, acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. George C. A. Hockley, Derniese Goh, Pilar Lafuente, and Karen Perry contributed to acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. All authors drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.

• References

• 1 von Pfeil DJ, DeCamp CE. The epiphyseal plate: physiology, anatomy, and trauma. Compend Contin Educ Vet 2009; 31 (08) E1-E11 , quiz E12
• 2 Rayward R. The scapula. In: Gemmill TJ, Clements DN. , eds. BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Fracture Repair and Management. 2nd ed. Quedgeley: British Small Animal Veterinary Association; 2016: 188-197
• 3 Cook JL, Cook CR, Tomlinson JL. , et al. Scapular fractures in dogs: epidemiology, classification, and concurrent injuries in 105 cases (1988-1994). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1997; 33 (06) 528-532
• 4 Harari J, Dunning D. Fractures of the scapula in dogs: a retrospective review of 12 cases. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1993; 06 (02) 105-108
• 5 DeCamp CE, Johnston SA, Déjardin LM. , et al. Fractures of the scapula. In: DeCamp CE, Johnston SA, Déjardin LM, Schaefer SL. , eds. Brinker, Piermattei, and Flo's Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 5th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2016: 251-259
• 6 Perry KL, Woods S. Fractures of the scapula. Companion Anim 2017; 22 (06) 340-348
• 7 Newton CD. Fractures of the scapula. In: Newton CD, Nunamaker DM. , eds. Textbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1985: 333-342
• 8 Peck JN, Leasure J. Scapula fractures. In: Johnson SA, Tobias KM. , eds. Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal. 2nd ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2017: 794-799
• 9 Johnson KA. Piermattei's Atlas of Surgical Approaches to the Bones and Joints of the Dog and Cat. 5th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2014: 118-159
• 10 Gill PJ, Lippincott CL, Anderson SM. Longitudinal myotomy of the supraspinatus muscle: a new approach to the supraglenoid tubercle of the scapula. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1996; 32 (03) 243-246
• 11 DeCamp CE, Johnston SA, Déjardin LM. , et al. The shoulder joint. In: DeCamp CE, Johnston SA, Déjardin LM, Schaefer SL. , eds. Brinker, Piermattei, and Flo's Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair. 5th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2016: 260-297
• 12 Scott HW, McLaughlin RM. Fractures and disorders of the forelimb. In: Scott HW, McLaughlin RM. , eds. Feline Orthopedics. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis; 2007: 107-114
• 13 Millis D, Levine D. Responses of musculoskeletal tissues to disuse and remobilization. In: Millis D, Levine D. , eds. Canine Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2013: 92-153
• 14 Henderson AL, Latimer C, Millis DL. Rehabilitation and physical therapy for selected orthopedic conditions in veterinary patients. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2015; 45 (01) 91-121
• 15 May SA, Wyn-Jones G. The diagnosis of the causes of lameness. In: Wyn-Jones G. , ed. Equine Lameness. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1988: 5
• 16 Cook JL, Evans R, Conzemius MG. , et al. Proposed definitions and criteria for reporting time frame, outcome, and complications for clinical orthopedic studies in veterinary medicine. Vet Surg 2010; 39 (08) 905-908
• 17 Brown DC, Boston RC, Coyne JC, Farrar JT. Development and psychometric testing of an instrument designed to measure chronic pain in dogs with osteoarthritis. Am J Vet Res 2007; 68 (06) 631-637
• 18 Aron DN, Johnson AL, Palmer RH. Biologic strategies and a balanced concept for repair of highly comminuted long bone fractures. Comp Cont Edu Small Anim 1995; 17: 35-47
• 19 Brunnberg L, Waibl H, Meyer-Lindenberg A. Zur operativen Versorgung der Fraktur des Tuberculum supraglenoidale scapulae (Surgical management of supraglenoid tubercle fractures of the scapula). Kleintierprax 1993; 38: 425-432
• 20 Johnson AL, Dunning D. Supraglenoid tuberosity fractures. In: Atlas of Orthopaedic Surgical Procedures of the Dog and Cat. St Louis: Elsevier; 2005: 144-145
• 21 Frei S, Fürst AE, Sacks M, Bischofberger AS. Fixation of supraglenoid tubercle fractures using distal femoral locking plates in three Warmblood horses. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29 (03) 246-252
• 22 Ahern BJ, Bayliss IPM, Zedler ST, Getman LM, Richardson DW. Supraglenoid tubercle fractures repair with transverse locking compression plates in 4 horses. Vet Surg 2017; 46 (04) 507-514
• 23 Schaaf OR, Eaton-Wells R, Mitchell RA. Biceps brachii and brachialis tendon of insertion injuries in eleven racing greyhounds. Vet Surg 2009; 38 (07) 825-833
• 24 Davidson EB, Griffey SM, Vasseur PB, Shields SL. Histopathological, radiographic, and arthrographic comparison of the biceps tendon in normal dogs and dogs with biceps tenosynovitis. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2000; 36 (06) 522-530
• 25 Carr BJ, Dycus DL. Canine gait analysis. Recovery & Rehab Today’s Veterinary Practice 2016; 93-100