Barbed Sutures in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Are They Really Useful? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Bidirectional barbed sutures (BBSs) have recently been investigated in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The contrasting results from the scarce literature suggest that BBSs are safe, save time and money, and give results comparable to traditional sutures. The purpose of the study is to test the real effect of BBSs on closure time in TKA and assess the functional results as well as the complications related to them. It was a randomized controlled trial. Eighty-five patients undergoing primary TKA were assigned to receive traditional closure with Vicryl (V-group) or with BBSs (Q-group). The exclusion criteria were significant coronal deformity, flexion contracture, or the need for stem and/or augmentation. The closure time for the capsule and that for the subcutaneous layer were registered separately. Intraoperative incidences were recorded. The follow-up was up to 1 month, during which the range of motion (ROM), superficial or deep infection, and wound dehiscence were assessed. There was a significant reduction in the capsule layer (27 seconds; p = 0.02) and global time closure (51 seconds; p = 0.01) in the Q-group. No differences were found in the subcutaneous layer (24 seconds; p = 0.055). There were more intraoperative suture breakages in the Q-group, mainly in the subcutaneous layer (p < 0.001). No differences in terms of dehiscence, infection, and ROM were observed at the 1-month follow-up. BBSs allow for slightly faster wound closure than Vicryl during a TKA. However, the differences observed have minimal clinical repercussions. Moreover, no differences in the infection rate (deep or superficial), dehiscence, or ROM were found.

Keywords

barbed suture - total knee arthroplasty - closure time

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 08. November 2017

Angenommen: 05. April 2019

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. Mai 2019

• References

• 1 Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson MG, Richart T. Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J 2006; 2 (01) 70-72
• 2 Chan VWK, Chan PK, Chiu KY, Yan CH, Ng FY. Does barbed suture lower cost and improve outcome in total knee arthroplasty? A randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (05) 1474-1477
• 3 Gililland JM, Anderson LA, Barney JK, Ross HL, Pelt CE, Peters CL. Barbed versus standard sutures for closure in total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (9, Suppl): 135-138
• 4 Levine BR, Ting N, Della Valle CJ. Use of a barbed suture in the closure of hip and knee arthroplasty wounds. Orthopedics 2011; 34 (09) e473-e475
• 5 Ting NT, Moric MM, Della Valle CJ, Levine BR. Use of knotless suture for closure of total hip and knee arthroplasties: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (10) 1783-1788
• 6 Maheshwari AV, Naziri Q, Wong A, Burko I, Mont MA, Rasquinha VJ. Barbed sutures in total knee arthroplasty: are these safe, efficacious, and cost-effective?. J Knee Surg 2015; 28 (02) 151-156
• 7 Vakil JJ, O'Reilly MP, Sutter EG, Mears SC, Belkoff SM, Khanuja HS. Knee arthrotomy repair with a continuous barbed suture: a biomechanical study. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (05) 710-713
• 8 Borzio RW, Pivec R, Kapadia BH, Jauregui JJ, Maheshwari AV. Barbed sutures in total hip and knee arthroplasty: what is the evidence? A meta-analysis. Int Orthop 2016; 40 (02) 225-231
• 9 Meena S, Gangary S, Sharma P, Chowdhury B. Barbed versus standard sutures in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2015; 25 (06) 1105-1110
• 10 Zhang W, Xue D, Yin H. , et al. Barbed versus traditional sutures for wound closure in knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 19764
• 11 Stephens S, Politi J, Taylor BC. Evaluation of primary total knee arthroplasty incision closure with the use of continuous bidirectional barbed suture. Surg Technol Int 2011; 21: 199-203
• 12 Campbell AL, Patrick Jr DA, Liabaud B, Geller JA. Superficial wound closure complications with barbed sutures following knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (05) 966-969
• 13 Chawla H, van der List JP, Fein NB, Henry MW, Pearle AD. Barbed suture is associated with increased risk of wound infection after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (07) 1561-1567
• 14 Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992; 13 (10) 606-608
• 15 Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) hospital infection control practices advisory committee. Am J Infect Control 1999; 27 (02) 97-132 , quiz 133–134, discussion 96
• 16 NHSN. (2016) Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf
• 17 Smith EL, DiSegna ST, Shukla PY, Matzkin EG. Barbed versus traditional sutures: closure time, cost, and wound related outcomes in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (02) 283-287
• 18 Sah AP. Is there an advantage to knotless barbed suture in TKA wound closure? A Randomized trial in simultaneous bilateral TKAs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (06) 2019-2027
• 19 Morris MR, Bergum C, Jackson N, Markel DC. Decreased bacterial adherence, biofilm formation, and tissue reactivity of barbed monofilament suture in an in vivo contaminated wound model. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (04) 1272-1279