Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1688931
Incidence of Femoral Component Malrotation Using Posterior Condylar Referencing in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Funding None.![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/jks/202010/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0039-1688931_180034oa-1.jpg)
Abstract
Proper femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important, given the prognostic impact of a poorly positioned component. The purpose of this observational study was to determine the incidence of femoral component malrotation using posterior condylar axis (PCA) referencing. A total of 100 knees in 92 patients with varus gonarthritis of the knee undergoing primary TKA using a standard medial parapatellar approach were evaluated intraoperatively. After distal femoral resection, the standard femoral sizing guide referencing the posterior condylar axis was used to set femoral component rotation. This was then compared with both the transepicondylar (TEA) and trochlear anteroposterior axes (TRAx). Disparites were recorded and corrected in line with the epicondylar axis. Rotational adjustment for addition of further external rotation was made in 13 (13.0%) cases. In seven cases, the medial pin sites were raised between 1 and 3 mm, and in six cases, the lateral pin site was lowered between 1 and 3 mm (based on risk of notching the femoral cortex). It is critical to not rely exclusively on the PCA to confirm rotational positioning of the femoral component as predicted by posterior condylar referencing guides. Intraoperative adjustment and confirmation using the TEA and TRAx occurred in 13% of primary TKA cases, which might have, otherwise, had a significant effect on the clinical outcome.
Publication History
Received: 01 February 2018
Accepted: 05 April 2019
Article published online:
20 May 2019
© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
-
References
- 1 Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T. , et al. Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (366) 155-163
- 2 Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (286) 40-47
- 3 Hanada H, Whiteside LA, Steiger J, Dyer P, Naito M. Bone landmarks are more reliable than tensioned gaps in TKA component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 462 (462) 137-142
- 4 Kim D, Seong SC, Lee MC, Lee S. Comparison of the tibiofemoral rotational alignment after mobile and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (02) 337-345
- 5 Merican AM, Ghosh KM, Iranpour F, Deehan DJ, Amis AA. The effect of femoral component rotation on the kinematics of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (09) 1479-1487
- 6 Asano T, Akagi M, Nakamura T. The functional flexion-extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis: in vivo analysis using a biplanar image-matching technique. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (08) 1060-1067
- 7 Griffin FM, Insall JN, Scuderi GR. The posterior condylar angle in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13 (07) 812-815
- 8 Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; (331) 35-46
- 9 Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke TD. The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69 (06) 873-880
- 10 Hungerford DS, Kenna RV. Preliminary experience with a total knee prosthesis with porous coating used without cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; (176) 95-107
- 11 Laskin RS. Flexion space configuration in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10 (05) 657-660
- 12 Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS, White SE. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77 (09) 1331-1334
- 13 Whiteside LA, Arima J. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (321) 168-172
- 14 Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD. The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356) 111-118
- 15 Victor J, Van Doninck D, Labey L, Van Glabbeek F, Parizel P, Bellemans J. A common reference frame for describing rotation of the distal femur: a ct-based kinematic study using cadavers. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (05) 683-690
- 16 Jenny J-Y, Boeri C. Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75 (01) 74-77
- 17 Galaud B, Beaufils P, Michaut M, Abadie P, Fallet L, Boisrenoult P. [Distal femoral torsion: comparison of CT scan and intra operative navigation measurements during total knee arthroplasty. A report of 70 cases]. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 2008; 94 (06) 573-579
- 18 Talbot S, Bartlett J. The anterior surface of the femur as a new landmark for femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (03) 258-262
- 19 Siston RA, Patel JJ, Goodman SB, Delp SL, Giori NJ. The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (10) 2276-2280
- 20 Victor J. Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009; 95 (05) 365-372
- 21 Schnurr C, Nessler J, König DP. Is referencing the posterior condyles sufficient to achieve a rectangular flexion gap in total knee arthroplasty?. Int Orthop 2009; 33 (06) 1561-1565
- 22 Restrepo C, Hozack WJ, Orozco F, Parvizi J. Accuracy of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty using computer assisted navigation. Comput Aided Surg 2008; 13 (03) 167-172
- 23 Gurava Reddy AV, Mathur RK, Mugalur A, Eachempati KK, Reddy A. Reference axes for optimal femoral rotational alignment in varus osteoarthritic Indian knees - A CT based study. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2016; 7 (Suppl. 02) 215-219
- 24 Franceschini V, Nodzo SR, Gonzalez Della Valle A. Femoral Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison Between Transepicondylar Axis and Posterior Condylar Line Referencing. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (12) 2917-2921
- 25 Nodzo SR, Franceschini V, Gonzalez Della Valle A. Intraoperative load-sensing variability during cemented, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (01) 66-70
- 26 Gustke KA, Golladay GJ, Roche MW, Elson LC, Anderson CR. A new method for defining balance: promising short-term clinical outcomes of sensor-guided TKA. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (05) 955-960
- 27 Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT. The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (287) 170-177
- 28 Mochizuki RM, Schurman DJ. Patellar complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61 (6A): 879-883
- 29 Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356) 144-153
- 30 Yoshii I, Whiteside LA, White SE, Milliano MT. Influence of prosthetic joint line position on knee kinematics and patellar position. J Arthroplasty 1991; 6 (02) 169-177
- 31 Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Hirata G, Iwamoto Y. Effect of femoral and tibial component position on patellar tracking following total knee arthroplasty: 10-year follow-up of Miller-Galante I knees. Am J Knee Surg 2001; 14 (03) 152-156
- 32 Rhoads DD, Noble PC, Reuben JD, Mahoney OM, Tullos HS. The effect of femoral component position on patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (260) 43-51
- 33 Fehring TK. Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; (380) 72-79
- 34 Gustke KA, Golladay GJ, Roche MW, Elson LC, Anderson CR. Primary TKA patients with quantifiably balanced soft-tissue achieve significant clinical gains sooner than unbalanced patients. Adv Orthop 2014; 2014: 628695
- 35 Ritter MA, Lutgring JD, Davis KE, Berend ME, Pierson JL, Meneghini RM. The role of flexion contracture on outcomes in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (08) 1092-1096
- 36 Vuorenmaa M, Ylinen J, Piitulainen K. , et al. Efficacy of a 12-month, monitored home exercise programme compared with normal care commencing 2 months after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 2014; 46 (02) 166-172
- 37 Victor J, Ghijselings S, Tajdar F. , et al. Total knee arthroplasty at 15-17 years: does implant design affect outcome?. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (02) 235-241
- 38 Okamoto S, Mizu-uchi H, Okazaki K. , et al. Two-dimensional planning can result in internal rotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (01) 229-235
- 39 Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD. Varus tibial joint line obliquity: a potential cause of femoral component malrotation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (392) 68-74
- 40 Maradit Kremers H, Larson DR, Crowson CS. , et al. Prevalence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (17) 1386-1397
- 41 Singh JA, Vessely MB, Harmsen SW. , et al. A population-based study of trends in the use of total hip and total knee arthroplasty, 1969–2008. Mayo Clin Proc 2010; 85 (10) 898-904
- 42 Mahomed NN, Barrett J, Katz JN, Baron JA, Wright J, Losina E. Epidemiology of total knee replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (06) 1222-1228
- 43 Memtsoudis SG, Della Valle AG, Besculides MC, Gaber L, Laskin R. Trends in demographics, comorbidity profiles, in-hospital complications and mortality associated with primary knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (04) 518-527