Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2020; 37(09): 970-974
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1689002
Commentary
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Bridging the Gap in Gestational Diabetes: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Improving GDM Using a Chronic Care–Based Clinical Framework

Seuli Bose-Brill
1   Division of General Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
Taylor E. Freeman
1   Division of General Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
Laura Miles 
1   Division of General Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
Laura Prater
1   Division of General Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
Mei-Wei Chang
2   The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, Ohio
,
Julie K. Bower
3   Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio
4   Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

27 February 2019

22 April 2019

Publication Date:
30 May 2019 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects 2 to 10% of pregnancies and is associated with a 35 to 60% chance of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the proceeding 10 to 20 years.[1] Women with GDM are at increased risk for preeclampsia and cesarean delivery, and are more likely to have recurrence of GDM in subsequent pregnancies.[2] [3] [4] [5] Neonates born to mothers with GDM are more likely to have shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycemia, birth trauma, hyperbilirubinemia, large for gestational age, and spend time in the neonatal intensive care unit.[3] [6] Incidence has increased with increasing obesity, as well as with racial/ethnic health disparities, with minority women at highest risk of GDM and subsequent T2DM.[7] [8] [9] In the 3 months after birth, many patients are lost to follow-up because of variation in practice standards and inadequate coordination between obstetrics during pregnancy and primary care following delivery.[10]

Women with GDM often do not attend routine preventative care and postpartum diabetes screening.[7] The postpartum visit is underutilized, with only an estimated one-third of women with GDM completing the recommended postpartum oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).[11] Gaps in care for people with T2DM can promote microvascular disease progression, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and other worsened health outcomes.[12] Furthermore, many GDM women face socioeconomic barriers preventing them from accessing care relative to those receiving recommended postpartum glucose testing.[11] These vulnerable patients must be cared for with innovative clinical care models that allow convenient access to relevant services that meet their medical and social needs.

Due to increased risk for the development of T2DM requiring increased need for surveillance, GDM is a condition that benefits from chronic management approaches. The chronic care model (CCM) provides infrastructure for systematic, patient-centered approaches to clinical management of GDM during and following pregnancy.[13] This model has successfully been applied to conditions such as congestive heart failure (CHF), asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes to improve processes of care, outcomes, and reduce health care costs; yet, this model has not been applied to GDM.[14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] Compared with usual care, CCM management models have demonstrated outcomes such as reduction in health care costs among patients with CHF[16] [18]; improvement in asthma-related quality of life measurements[17]; decreased COPD-related hospitalization, length of stay, and emergency room utilization[19]; and reduction of hemoglobin A1c levels and 10-year cardiovascular disease risk scores in patients with T2DM.[15] [19] In light of these improvements, application of CCM holds great promise in improving guideline-based health outcomes in GDM.

Originally published in 1998 and developed based on a synthesis of literature and review of interventions to improve care for chronically ill populations, the CCM has been widely implemented to improve primary care in the United States.[18] [20] The CCM outlines six factors essential for approaching chronic illness within primary care, including health systems, the community, self-management support (i.e., developing skills to independently address chronic illness), delivery system design, decision support (i.e., reminders for physicians on evidence-based guidelines), and clinical information systems.[20] [21] [22] CCM interventions longitudinally aligned with stages of pregnancy (prenatal, delivery, and the neonatal period) can improve delivery of guideline-based care for GDM. We use a conceptual framework approach to propose a CCM for postpartum women with GDM.

 

  • References

  • 1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: National Estimates and General Information in Diabetes and Prediabetes in the United States, 2011. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Getahun D, Fassett MJ, Jacobsen SJ. Gestational diabetes: risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (05) 467.e1-467.e6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 190: gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131 (02) e49-e64
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Yogev Y, Xenakis EM, Langer O. The association between preeclampsia and the severity of gestational diabetes: the impact of glycemic control. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (05) 1655-1660
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Ehrenberg HM, Durnwald CP, Catalano P, Mercer BM. The influence of obesity and diabetes on the risk of cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (03) 969-974
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Battarbee AN, Yee LM. Barriers to postpartum follow-up and glucose tolerance testing in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Perinatol 2018; 35 (04) 354-360
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 American Diabetes Association. Introduction: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2019 . Diabetes Care 2019; 42 (Suppl. 01) S1-S2
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Lavery JA, Friedman AM, Keyes KM, Wright JD, Ananth CV. Gestational diabetes in the United States: temporal changes in prevalence rates between 1979 and 2010. BJOG 2017; 124 (05) 804-813
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Xiang AH, Li BH, Black MH. , et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in diabetes risk after gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 2011; 54 (12) 3016-3021
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Dietz PM, Vesco KK, Callaghan WM. , et al. Postpartum screening for diabetes after a gestational diabetes mellitus-affected pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112 (04) 868-874
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Carson MP, Frank MI, Keely E. Original research: postpartum testing rates among women with a history of gestational diabetes--systematic review. Prim Care Diabetes 2013; 7 (03) 177-186
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Clark CM, Fradkin JE, Hiss RG, Lorenz RA, Vinicor F, Warren-Boulton E. Promoting early diagnosis and treatment of type 2 diabetes: the National Diabetes Education Program. JAMA 2000; 284 (03) 363-365
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Harrington JT, Walsh MB. Pre-appointment management of new patient referrals in rheumatology: a key strategy for improving health care delivery. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 45 (03) 295-300
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Bennett WL, Ennen CS, Carrese JA. , et al. Barriers to and facilitators of postpartum follow-up care in women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus: a qualitative study. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011; 20 (02) 239-245
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Stellefson M, Dipnarine K, Stopka C. The chronic care model and diabetes management in US primary care settings: a systematic review. Prev Chronic Dis 2013; 10: E26
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Sochalski J, Jaarsma T, Krumholz HM. , et al. What works in chronic care management: the case of heart failure. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009; 28 (01) 179-189
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Mangione-Smith R, Schonlau M, Chan KS. , et al. Measuring the effectiveness of a collaborative for quality improvement in pediatric asthma care: does implementing the chronic care model improve processes and outcomes of care?. Ambul Pediatr 2005; 5 (02) 75-82
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH. Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009; 28 (01) 75-85
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Adams SG, Smith PK, Allan PF, Anzueto A, Pugh JA, Cornell JE. Systematic review of the chronic care model in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevention and management. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167 (06) 551-561
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?. Eff Clin Pract 1998; 1 (01) 2-4
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, part 2. JAMA 2002; 288 (15) 1909-1914
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA 2002; 288 (14) 1775-1779
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Kozhimannil KB, Pereira MA, Harlow BL. Association between diabetes and perinatal depression among low-income mothers. JAMA 2009; 301 (08) 842-847
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Schellinger MM, Abernathy MP, Amerman B. , et al. Improved outcomes for Hispanic women with gestational diabetes using the CenteringPregnancy© group prenatal care model. Matern Child Health J 2017; 21 (02) 297-305
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Seshiah V. Postpartum screening after gestational diabetes mellitus: aiming for universal coverage. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2015; 19 (03) 435
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Ewing M. The patient-centered medical home solution to the cost-quality conundrum. J Healthc Manag 2013; 58 (04) 258-266
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Miller BF, Petterson S, Brown Levey SM, Payne-Murphy JC, Moore M, Bazemore A. Primary care, behavioral health, provider colocation, and rurality. J Am Board Fam Med 2014; 27 (03) 367-374
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Yee LM, Martinez NG, Nguyen AT, Hajjar N, Chen MJ, Simon MA. Using a patient navigator to improve postpartum care in an urban women's health clinic. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129 (05) 925-933
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Natale-Pereira A, Enard KR, Nevarez L, Jones LA. The role of patient navigators in eliminating health disparities. Cancer 2011; 117 (15, Suppl): 3543-3552
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Grassley J, Eschiti VS. Two generations learning together: facilitating grandmothers' support of breastfeeding. Int J Childbirth Educ 2007; 22 (03) 23-26
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Maeng DD, Graf TR, Davis DE, Tomcavage J, Bloom Jr FJ. Can a patient-centered medical home lead to better patient outcomes? The quality implications of Geisinger's ProvenHealth Navigator. Am J Med Qual 2012; 27 (03) 210-216
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Lindberg SM, DeBoth A, Anderson CK. Effect of a best practice alert on gestational weight gain, health services, and pregnancy outcomes. Matern Child Health J 2016; 20 (10) 2169-2178
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Beck A, Scott J, Williams P. , et al. A randomized trial of group outpatient visits for chronically ill older HMO members: the Cooperative Health Care Clinic. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45 (05) 543-549
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Meek JY, Hatcher AJ. ; SECTION ON BREASTFEEDING. The breastfeeding-friendly pediatric office practice. Pediatrics 2017; 139 (05) e20170647
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 De Jongh T, Gurol-Urganci I, Vodopivec-Jamsek V, Car J, Atun R. Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (12) CD007459
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Wilcox A, Levi EE, Garrett JM. Predictors of non-attendance to the postpartum follow-up visit. Matern Child Health J 2016; 20 (01) (Suppl. 01) 22-27
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Caulfield LE, Gross SM, Bentley ME. , et al. WIC-based interventions to promote breastfeeding among African-American Women in Baltimore: effects on breastfeeding initiation and continuation. J Hum Lact 1998; 14 (01) 15-22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Bennett WL, Chang HY, Levine DM. , et al. Utilization of primary and obstetric care after medically complicated pregnancies: an analysis of medical claims data. J Gen Intern Med 2014; 29 (04) 636-645
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Casalino LP, Gans D, Weber R. , et al. US physician practices spend more than $15.4 billion annually to report quality measures. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35 (03) 401-406
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar