Measurement of Shoulder Abduction Angles in Dogs: An Ex Vivo Study of Accuracy and Repeatability

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy and repeatability of the shoulder abduction test and to assess the effect of transection of the medial shoulder support structures in canine cadavers.

Materials and Methods The shoulder abduction angle was measured by three separate observers, both with the shoulder extended and at a neutral angle. Shoulder abduction was then measured, using craniocaudal fluoroscopic images. Arthroscopy was performed in all shoulder joints, with the medial support structures transected in one shoulder of each dog. The three observers again measured shoulder abduction angles in all dogs. Shoulder abduction was measured again using fluoroscopy. Accuracy and repeatability of the abduction test were assessed using linear mixed models.

Results All three observers had different measured abduction angles when compared with fluoroscopy (p < 0.01); however, the experienced surgeon had an error of only 2.9°. Inter-observer repeatability was poor, with all three observers having different abduction measurements (p < 0.001). Intra-observer repeatability, however, indicated no differences on repeated measurements (p = 0.26). Placing the shoulder at a neutral standing angle, and transection of support structures caused an average increase in abduction by 8.2° (p < 0.001) and 4.4° respectively.

Conclusion Significant variation exists between observers performing this test, increased accuracy seen in the more experienced observer. Shoulder flexion angle can significantly affect measured abduction angles.

Keywords

shoulder abduction - measurement - dog - instability - fluoroscopy

Author Contribution

Stephen C. Jones contributed to conception of study, study design and data acquisition, analysis and interpretation. James Howard, Judith Bertran, Brittney Johnson and Nina Kieves contributed to study design and data acquisition. Antonio Pozzi and Alan Litsky contributed to the study design. Tom Wittum performed the statistical analysis and interpretation. All authors contributed to writing and revising the manuscript and all authors approved the manuscript.

• References

• 1 Bardet JF. Diagnosis of shoulder instability in dogs and cats: a retrospective study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1998; 34 (01) 42-54
• 2 Devitt CM, Neely MR, Vanvechten BJ. Relationship of physical examination test of shoulder instability to arthroscopic findings in dogs. Vet Surg 2007; 36 (07) 661-668
• 3 Franklin SP, Devitt CM, Ogawa J, Ridge P, Cook JL. Outcomes associated with treatments for medial, lateral, and multidirectional shoulder instability in dogs. Vet Surg 2013; 42 (04) 361-364
• 4 Vasseur PB, Moore D, Brown SA. Stability of the canine shoulder joint: an in vitro analysis. Am J Vet Res 1982; 43 (02) 352-355
• 5 Sidaway BK, McLaughlin RM, Elder SH, Boyle CR, Silverman EB. Role of the tendons of the biceps brachii and infraspinatus muscles and the medial glenohumeral ligament in the maintenance of passive shoulder joint stability in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2004; 65 (09) 1216-1222
• 6 Cogar SM, Cook CR, Curry SL, Grandis A, Cook JL. Prospective evaluation of techniques for differentiating shoulder pathology as a source of forelimb lameness in medium and large breed dogs. Vet Surg 2008; 37 (02) 132-141
• 7 Murphy SE, Ballegeer EA, Forrest LJ, Schaefer SL. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in dogs with confirmed shoulder pathology. Vet Surg 2008; 37 (07) 631-638
• 8 Cook JL, Renfro DC, Tomlinson JL, Sorensen JE. Measurement of angles of abduction for diagnosis of shoulder instability in dogs using goniometry and digital image analysis. Vet Surg 2005; 34 (05) 463-468
• 9 Dohoo IR, Martin SW, Stryhn H. Veterinary Epidemiological Research. VER Inc. Prince Edward Island, Canada: Charlottetown; 2009 ;2: 349-355
• 10 Cook JL, Tomlinson JL, Fox DB, Kenter K, Cook CR. Treatment of dogs diagnosed with medial shoulder instability using radiofrequency-induced thermal capsulorrhaphy. Vet Surg 2005; 34 (05) 469-475