RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692718
Chorioamnionitis and Infectious Complications after Vaginal Delivery
Funding None.Publikationsverlauf
06. März 2019
25. Mai 2019
Publikationsdatum:
25. Juni 2019 (online)

Abstract
Objective To estimate the incidence of and define risk factors for postpartum infectious complications after vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) complicated by chorioamnionitis.
Study Design A secondary analysis of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Cesarean Registry was performed. The primary outcome was a composite of postpartum infection: endometritis, sepsis, pelvic abscess, urinary tract infection, necrotizing fasciitis, and septic pelvic thrombophlebitis. Peripartum predictors were compared using parametric and nonparametric tests, as appropriate, and multivariate predictors assessed using logistic regression.
Results A total of 559 subjects had chorioamnionitis in labor and a successful VBAC. Twenty-four (4.3%) subjects experienced the primary outcome, mainly due to endometritis (19/24). Significant factors included preterm delivery <32 weeks (odds ratio [OR]: 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32–7.06) and body mass index (BMI) ≥40 (OR: 4.63, 95% CI: 1.25–17.14). Receipt of postpartum antibiotics was protective against postpartum infection (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.12–0.65). In multivariate analysis, preterm delivery <32 weeks, BMI ≥40, and receipt of postpartum antibiotics remained associated with postpartum infection.
Conclusion Nearly 5% of women with chorioamnionitis had a postpartum infectious complication after vaginal delivery, with higher rates in those delivering at <32 weeks and with prepregnancy BMI ≥40. Receipt of postpartum antibiotics decreased the odds of postpartum infection markedly.
Keywords
chorioamnionitis - intra-amniotic infection - vaginal delivery - postpartum infection - endometritis - antibioticsNote
This research was presented in poster format at the Infectious Diseases Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology's Annual Meeting in Philadelphia, PA, August 2–4, 2018.
-
References
- 1 Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion no. 712: intrapartum management of intraamniotic infection. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (02) e95-e101
- 2 Kim CJ, Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Chaiyasit N, Yoon BH, Kim YM. Acute chorioamnionitis and funisitis: definition, pathologic features, and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213 (4, Suppl): S29-S52
- 3 Randis TM, Rice MM, Myatt L. , et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. Incidence of early-onset sepsis in infants born to women with clinical chorioamnionitis. J Perinat Med 2018; 46 (08) 926-933
- 4 Dotters-Katz SK, Feldman C, Puechl A, Grotegut CA, Heine RP. Risk factors for post-operative wound infection in the setting of chorioamnionitis and cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29 (10) 1541-1545
- 5 [dataset] NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units Network. An Observational Study of Cesarean Section and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section. George Washington University Biostatistics Center; 1999–2002
- 6 Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY. , et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193 (3 Pt 2): 1016-1023
- 7 Rouse DJ, Landon M, Leveno KJ. , et al; National Institute of Child Health And Human Development, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Cesarean Registry: chorioamnionitis at term and its duration-relationship to outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (01) 211-216
- 8 Edwards RK, Duff P. Single additional dose postpartum therapy for women with chorioamnionitis. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102 (5 Pt 1): 957-961
- 9 Black LP, Hinson L, Duff P. Limited course of antibiotic treatment for chorioamnionitis. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119 (06) 1102-1105