Post-Treatment Classification for Acetabular Chondral Lesions in Hip Arthroscopy^[*]

Abstract

Objective To describe a postarthroscopic treatment classification system for acetabular chondral damage in the hip and to report the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of such classification.

Methods This is a retrospective review of ninety-nine digital video recordings made during arthroscopic surgery. Patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement and evaluated at the hip arthroscopy outpatient clinic between March 2015 and March 2016 were included in the study. Patients with a history of previous hip surgery, radiologic evidence of advanced osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade > 2), who underwent labral resection, or whose digital recordings were incomplete or of insufficient quality for adequate review were excluded. Two orthopedic surgeons, who did not participate in the surgery, independently reviewed the video recordings and classified the remaining acetabular cartilage using the post-treatment classification system. Intraobserver and interobserver analysis was then conducted using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results Excellent intraobserver reliability (ICC = 0.790; p < 0.001) and interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.882; p < 0.001) were observed. Both ICC values were statistically significant.

Conclusion The posttreatment classification of the remaining acetabular cartilage has excellent intra and interobserver reliability.

Keywords

arthroscopy - hip injuries - chondrocytes/classification - treatment outcome

• Referências

• 1 Johnston TL, Schenker ML, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ. Relationship between offset angle alpha and hip chondral injury in femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (06) 669-675
• 2 Amenabar T, Piriz J, Mella C, Hetaimish BM, O'Donnell J. Reliability of 3 Different Arthroscopic Classifications for Chondral Damage of the Acetabulum. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (08) 1492-1496
• 3 Nepple JJ, Larson CM, Smith MV, Kim YJ, Zaltz I, Sierra RJ. , et al. The reliability of arthroscopic classification of acetabular rim labrochondral disease. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (10) 2224-2229
• 4 Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (07) 1012-1018
• 5 Konan S, Rayan F, Meermans G, Witt J, Haddad FS. Validation of the classification system for acetabular chondral lesions identified at arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (03) 332-336
• 6 Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1961; 43-B: 752-757
• 7 MacDonald AE, Bedi A, Horner NS, de Sa D, Simunovic N, Philippon MJ. , et al. Indications and outcomes for microfracture as an adjunct to hip arthroscopy for treatment of chondral defects in patients with femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2016; 32 (01) 190-200.e2
• 8 Filbay SR, Kemp JL, Ackerman IN, Crossley KM. Quality of life impairments after hip arthroscopy in people with hip chondropathy. J Hip Preserv Surg 2016; 3 (02) 154-164
• 9 Streich NA, Gotterbarm T, Barié A, Schmitt H. Prognostic value of chondral defects on the outcome after arthroscopic treatment of acetabular labral tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (10) 1257-1263
• 10 Kemp JL, Makdissi M, Schache AG, Pritchard MG, Pollard TC, Crossley KM. Hip chondropathy at arthroscopy: prevalence and relationship to labral pathology, femoroacetabular impingement and patient-reported outcomes. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48 (14) 1102-1107
• 11 Schmaranzer F, Haefeli PC, Hanke MS, Liechti EF, Werlen SF, Siebenrock KA. , et al. How Does the dGEMRIC Index Change After Surgical Treatment for FAI? A Prospective Controlled Study: Preliminary Results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (04) 1080-1099
• 12 Byrd JW. Hip arthroscopy. The supine position. Clin Sports Med 2001; 20 (04) 703-731
• 13 Byrd JW, Jones KS. Microfracture for Grade IV Chondral Lesions of the Hip. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (05) 739-746
• 14 Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 1994; 6 (04) 284-290
• 15 Cameron ML, Briggs KK, Steadman JR. Reproducibility and reliability of the outerbridge classification for grading chondral lesions of the knee arthroscopically. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31 (01) 83-86
• 16 Beck M, Leunig M, Parvizi J, Boutier V, Wyss D, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (418) 67-73
• 17 Gudas R, Stankevicius E, Monastyreckiene E, Pranys D, Kalesinskas RJ. Osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee joint in athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (09) 834-842
• 18 Miller BS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ, Rodkey WG. Patient satisfaction and outcome after microfracture of the degenerative knee. J Knee Surg 2004; 17 (01) 13-17
• 19 Asik M, Ciftci F, Sen C, Erdil M, Atalar A. The microfracture technique for the treatment of full-thickness articular cartilage lesions of the knee: midterm results. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (11) 1214-1220
• 20 de Windt TS, Bekkers JE, Creemers LB, Dhert WJ, Saris DB. Patient profiling in cartilage regeneration: prognostic factors determining success of treatment for cartilage defects. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (Suppl. 01) 58S-62S
• 21 Chahla J, LaPrade RF, Mardones R, Huard J, Philippon MJ, Nho S. , et al. Biological Therapies for Cartilage Lesions in the Hip: A New Horizon. Orthopedics 2016; 39 (04) e715-e723