Download PDF
Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 40(03): 297-304
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693405
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Development and Maintenance of a Pleural Disease Service: Role of the “Pleurologist”

Kelsey Cameron
1   New Haven, Connecticut
,
Dana Teodoro
2   Department of Respiratory Medicine (Thoracic Oncology), University Hospital of South Manchester, NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
3   Department of Surgery, Interventional Pulmonary, Yale New Haven Hospital, CT, USA
,
Azam Kasis
4   Department of Respiratory Medicine, Wirral University Teaching Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust Wirral, United Kingdom
,
Matthew Evison
3   Department of Surgery, Interventional Pulmonary, Yale New Haven Hospital, CT, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 September 2019 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Changes in the health care environment, increasing specialization, and the use of ultrasound have led to pleural diseases being managed by a select few. This article aims to look at the impact of current medical education paradigms, service structure, procedural education and role of the “pleurologist” in providing care to patients with pleural disease.

Keywords

procedural education - ultrasound - pleurologist - pleural disease
 

  • References

  • 1 Gordon CE, Feller-Kopman D, Balk EM, Smetana GW. Pneumothorax following thoracentesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170 (04) 332-339
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Havelock T, Teoh R, Laws D, Gleeson F. ; BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Pleural procedures and thoracic ultrasound: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax 2010; 65 (Suppl. 02) ii61-ii76
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Wise J. Everyone's a radiologist now. BMJ 2008; 336 (7652): 1041-1043
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Corcoran JP, Hallifax RJ, Talwar A, Psallidas I, Sykes A, Rahman NM. Intercostal chest drain insertion by general physicians: attitudes, experience and implications for training, service and patient safety. Postgrad Med J 2015; 91 (1075): 244-250
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Kay C, Wozniak EM, Szabo A, Jackson JL. Examining invasive bedside procedure performance at an academic medical center. South Med J 2016; 109 (07) 402-407
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Duszak Jr R, Chatterjee AR, Schneider DA. National fluid shifts: fifteen-year trends in paracentesis and thoracentesis procedures. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7 (11) 859-864
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Ault MJ, Rosen BT, Scher J, Feinglass J, Barsuk JH. Thoracentesis outcomes: a 12-year experience. Thorax 2015; 70 (02) 127-132
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Tukey MH, Wiener RS. The impact of a medical procedure service on patient safety, procedure quality and resident training opportunities. J Gen Intern Med 2014; 29 (03) 485-490
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Gilani N, Patel N, Gerkin RD, Ramirez FC, Tharalson EE, Patel K. The safety and feasibility of large volume paracentesis performed by an experienced nurse practitioner. Ann Hepatol 2009; 8 (04) 359-363
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Duncan DR, Morgenthaler TI, Ryu JH, Daniels CE. Reducing iatrogenic risk in thoracentesis: establishing best practice via experiential training in a zero-risk environment. Chest 2009; 135 (05) 1315-1320
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Lamont T, Surkitt-Parr M, Scarpello J, Durand M, Hooper C, Maskell N. Insertion of chest drains: summary of a safety report from the National Patient Safety Agency. BMJ 2009; 339: b4923
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Harris A, O'Driscoll BR, Turkington PM. Survey of major complications of intercostal chest drain insertion in the UK. Postgrad Med J 2010; 86 (1012): 68-72
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Elsayed H, Roberts R, Emadi M, Whittle I, Shackcloth M. Chest drain insertion is not a harmless procedure--are we doing it safely?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 11 (06) 745-748
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Sharp LK, Wang R, Lipsky MS. Perception of competency to perform procedures and future practice intent: a national survey of family practice residents. Acad Med 2003; 78 (09) 926-932
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Huang GC, Smith CC, Gordon CE. , et al. Beyond the comfort zone: residents assess their comfort performing inpatient medical procedures. Am J Med 2006; 119 (01) 71.e17-71.e24
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Brydges R, Stroud L, Wong BM, Holmboe ES, Imrie K, Hatala R. Core competencies or a competent core? A scoping review and realist synthesis of invasive bedside procedural skills training in internal medicine. Acad Med 2017; 92 (11) 1632-1643
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Wayne DB, Barsuk JH, O'Leary KJ, Fudala MJ, McGaghie WC. Mastery learning of thoracentesis skills by internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice. J Hosp Med 2008; 3 (01) 48-54
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Mourad M, Ranji S, Sliwka D. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of a teaching procedure service on the training of internal medicine residents. J Grad Med Educ 2012; 4 (02) 170-175
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Sacks CA, Alba GA, Miloslavsky EM. The evolution of procedural competency in internal medicine training. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177 (12) 1713-1714
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 McMurray L, Hall AK, Rich J, Merchant S, Chaplin T. The nightmares course: a longitudinal, multidisciplinary, simulation-based curriculum to train and assess resident competence in resuscitation. J Grad Med Educ 2017; 9 (04) 503-508
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med 2011; 86 (06) 706-711
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Soffler MI, Hayes MM, Smith CC. Central venous catheterization training: current perspectives on the role of simulation. Adv Med Educ Pract 2018; 9: 395-403
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Alsaad AA, Bhide VY, Moss Jr JL, Silvers SM, Johnson MM, Maniaci MJ. Central line proficiency test outcomes after simulation training versus traditional training to competence. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017; 14 (04) 550-554
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Walzak A, Bacchus M, Schaefer JP. , et al. Diagnosing technical competence in six bedside procedures: comparing checklists and a global rating scale in the assessment of resident performance. Acad Med 2015; 90 (08) 1100-1108
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, Agarwal R. Training and proficiency in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a systematic review. Respirology 2017; 22 (08) 1547-1557
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Davies HE, Mishra EK, Kahan BC. , et al. Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2012; 307 (22) 2383-2389
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Bhatnagar R, Keenan EK, Morley AJ. , et al. Outpatient talc administration by indwelling pleural catheter for malignant effusion. N Engl J Med 2018; 378 (14) 1313-1322
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Wahidi MM, Reddy C, Yarmus L. , et al. Randomized trial of pleural fluid drainage frequency in patients with malignant pleural effusions. The ASAP trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195 (08) 1050-1057
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Tsim S, Stobo DB, Alexander L, Kelly C, Blyth KG. The diagnostic performance of routinely acquired and reported computed tomography imaging in patients presenting with suspected pleural malignancy. Lung Cancer 2017; 103: 38-43
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Galateau-Salle F, Churg A, Roggli V, Travis WD. ; World Health Organization Committee for Tumors of the Pleura. The 2015 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the pleura: advances since the 2004 classification. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11 (02) 142-154
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Du Rand I, Maskell N. Introduction and methods: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax 2010; 65 (Suppl. 02) ii1-ii3
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Evison M, Blyth KG, Bhatnagar R. , et al. Providing safe and effective pleural medicine services in the UK: an aspirational statement from UK pleural physicians. BMJ Open Respir Res 2018; 5 (01) e000307
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Lu C, Jin YH, Gao W. , et al. Variation in nurse self-reported practice of managing chest tubes: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27 (5–6): e1013-e1021
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Roberts ME, Neville E, Berrisford RG, Antunes G, Ali NJ. ; BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Management of a malignant pleural effusion: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax 2010; 65 (Suppl. 02) ii32-ii40
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Feller-Kopman DJ, Reddy CB, DeCamp MM. , et al. Management of malignant pleural effusions. An official ATS/STS/STR clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018; 198 (07) 839-849
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Bibby AC, Dorn P, Psallidas I. , et al. ERS/EACTS statement on the management of malignant pleural effusions. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 55 (01) 116-132
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar