CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR 2019; 03(02): 098-104
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693535
Review Article
Indian Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Endovascular Management of Varicose Veins: A Review of Literature

Soumil Singhal
1   Department of Intervention Radiology and Intervention Oncology, BGS Gleneagles Global Hospital, Kengeri, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Mangerira Chinnappa Uthappa
1   Department of Intervention Radiology and Intervention Oncology, BGS Gleneagles Global Hospital, Kengeri, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received: 13. November 2018

Accepted after revision: 29. Januar 2019

Publikationsdatum:
15. Juli 2019 (online)

Abstract

Venous insufficiency of the lower limb is a common condition characterized by a spectrum of symptoms, including bulging leg veins, pain, swelling, and ulceration. Various treatment options are available; however, the newer endovascular options are easy, highly effective, safe, and quick in relieving symptoms. Endovascular treatment options include thermal ablation, mechanicochemical ablation, and foam sclerotherapy. This review article briefly describes various scoring systems used in varicose veins, the role of imaging, different management techniques, and guidelines proposed in the management of this condition.

 
  • References

  • 1 Khilnani NM, Grassi CJ, Kundu S. et al. Cardiovascular Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, American College of Phlebology, and Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committees. Multi-society consensus quality improvement guidelines for the treatment of lower-extremity superficial venous insufficiency with endovenous thermal ablation from the Society of Interventional Radiology, Cardiovascular Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, American College of Phlebology and Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (01) 14-31
  • 2 Meissner MH, Gloviczki P, Bergan J. et al. Primary chronic venous disorders. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46 (Suppl S) 54S-67S
  • 3 Beebe-Dimmer JL, Pfeifer JR, Engle JS, Schottenfeld D. The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. Ann Epidemiol 2005; 15 (03) 175-184
  • 4 Brand FN, Dannenberg AL, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. The epidemiology of varicose veins: the Framingham study. Am J. Prev Med 1988; 4 (02) 96-101
  • 5 Alexander CJ. The epidemiology of varicose veins. Med J Aust 1972; 1 (05) 215-218
  • 6 Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, Dalsing MC. et al. Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum. The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53 (05) Suppl 2S-48S
  • 7 Kundu S, Grassi CJ, Khilnani NM. et al. Cardiovascular Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, American College of Phlebology, and Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committees. Multi-disciplinary quality improvement guidelines for the treatment of lower extremity superficial venous insufficiency with ambulatory phlebectomy from the Society of Interventional Radiology, Cardiovascular Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, American College of Phlebology and Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21 (01) 1-13
  • 8 Beebe HG, Bergan JJ, Bergqvist D. et al. Classification and grading of chronic venous disease in the lower limbs. A consensus statement. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996; 12 (04) 487-491, (discussion) 491–492
  • 9 Rabe E, Pannier F. Clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathological classification (CEAP): gold standard and limits. Phlebology 2012; 27 (Suppl 1) 114-118
  • 10 Rutherford RB, Padberg Jr FT, Comerota AJ, Kistner RL, Meissner MH, Moneta GL. Venous severity scoring: an adjunct to venous outcome assessment. J Vasc Surg 2000; 31 (06) 1307-1312
  • 11 Vasquez MA, Rabe E, McLafferty RB. et al. American Venous Forum Ad Hoc Outcomes Working Group. Revision of the venous clinical severity score: venous outcomes consensus statement: special communication of the American Venous Forum Ad Hoc Outcomes Working Group. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52 (05) 1387-1396
  • 12 van Rij AM, Jones GT, Hill BG. et al. Mechanical inhibition of angiogenesis at the saphenofemoral junction in the surgical treatment of varicose veins: early results of a blinded randomized controlled trial. Circulation 2008; 118 (01) 66-74
  • 13 Sritharan K, Lane TR, Davies AH. The burden of depression in patients with symptomatic varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012; 43 (04) 480-484
  • 14 Launois R, Reboul-Marty J, Henry B. Construction and validation of a quality of life questionnaire in chronic lower limb venous insufficiency (CIVIQ). Qual Life Res 1996; 5 (06) 539-554
  • 15 Vasquez MA, Munschauer CE. Venous clinical severity score and quality-of-life assessment tools: application to vein practice. Phlebology 2008; 23 (06) 259-275
  • 16 De Maeseneer MG, Vandenbroeck CP, Hendriks JM, Lauwers PR, Van Schil PE. Accuracy of duplex evaluation one year after varicose vein surgery to predict recurrence at the saphenofemoral junction after five years. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 29 (03) 308-312
  • 17 Labropoulos N, Tiongson J, Pryor L. et al. Definition of venous reflux in lower-extremity veins. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38 (04) 793-798
  • 18 De Maeseneer M, Pichot O, Cavezzi A. et al. Union Internationale de Phlebologie. Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins of the lower limbs after treatment for varicose veins—UIP consensus document. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 42 (01) 89-102
  • 19 Royle JP. Recurrent varicose veins. World J Surg 1986; 10 (06) 944-953
  • 20 Blomgren L, Johansson G, Dahlberg- A, Kerman A. et al. Recurrent varicose veins: incidence, risk factors and groin anatomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 27 (03) 269-274
  • 21 van Rij AM, Jiang P, Solomon C, Christie RA, Hill GB. Recurrence after varicose vein surgery: a prospective long-term clinical study with duplex ultrasound scanning and air plethysmography. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38 (05) 935-943
  • 22 Mariani F. ed. Compression: Consensus Document Based on Scientific Literature and Clinical Experience. Torino, Italy: Edizioni Minerva Medica 2009
  • 23 Palfreyman SJ, Lochiel R, Michaels JA. A systematic review of compression therapy for venous leg ulcers. Vasc Med 1998; 3 (04) 301-313
  • 24 Lohr JM, Bush RL. Venous disease in women: epidemiology, manifestations, and treatment. J Vasc Surg 2013; 57 (04) (Suppl) 37S-45S
  • 25 Huang TW, Chen SL, Bai CH, Wu CH, Tam KW. The optimal duration of compression therapy following varicose vein surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 45 (04) 397-402
  • 26 Couzan S, Leizorovicz A, Laporte S. et al. A randomized double-blind trial of upward progressive versus degressive compressive stockings in patients with moderate to severe chronic venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg 2012; 56 (05) 1344-1350
  • 27 Cavezzi A, Tessari L. Foam sclerotherapy techniques: different gases and methods of preparation, catheter versus direct injection. Phlebology 2009; 24 (06) 247-251
  • 28 Tessari L, Cavezzi A, Frullini A. Preliminary experience with a new sclerosing foam in the treatment of varicose veins. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27 (01) 58-60
  • 29 Rathbun S, Norris A, Morrison N. et al. Performance of endovenous foam sclerotherapy in the USA for the treatment of venous disorders: ACP/SVM/AVF/SIR quality improvement guidelines. Phlebology 2014; 29 (02) 76-82
  • 30 Hobbs JT. Surgery and sclerotherapy in the treatment of varicose veins. A random trial. Arch Surg 1974; 109 (06) 793-796
  • 31 Mundy L, Merlin TL, Fitridge RA, Hiller JE. Systematic review of endovenous laser treatment for varicose veins. Br J Surg 2005; 92 (10) 1189-1194
  • 32 Disselhoff BC, der Kinderen DJ, Kelder JC, Moll FL. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser with cryostripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2008; 95 (10) 1232-1238
  • 33 Carradice D, Mekako AI, Mazari FA, Samuel N, Hatfield J, Chetter IC. Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation compared with conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2011; 98 (04) 501-510
  • 34 Rasmussen LH, Lawaetz M, Bjoern L, Vennits B, Blemings A, Eklof B. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg 2011; 98 (08) 1079-1087
  • 35 van den Bos R, Arends L, Kockaert M, Neumann M, Nijsten T. Endovenous therapies of lower extremity varicosities: a meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg 2009; 49 (01) 230-239
  • 36 Gibson KD, Ferris BL, Polissar N, Neradilek B, Pepper D. Endovenous laser treatment of the small [corrected] saphenous vein: efficacy and complications. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45 (04) 795-801, discussion 801–803
  • 37 Lawrence PF, Chandra A, Wu M. et al. Classification of proximal endovenous closure levels and treatment algorithm. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52 (02) 388-393
  • 38 King JT, O’Byrne M, Vasquez M, Wright D. VANISH-1 Investigator Group. Treatment of truncal incompetence and varicose veins with a single administration of a new polidocanol endovenous microfoam preparation improves symptoms and appearance. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 50 (06) 784-793
  • 39 van Eekeren RR, Hillebrands JL, van der Sloot K, de Vries JP, Zeebregts CJ, Reijnen MM. Histological observations one year after mechanochemical endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein. J Endovasc Ther 2014; 21 (03) 429-433
  • 40 van Eekeren RR, Boersma D, Konijn V, de Vries JP, Reijnen MM. Postoperative pain and early quality of life after radiofrequency ablation and mechanochemical endovenous ablation of incompetent great saphenous veins. J Vasc Surg 2013; 57 (02) 445-450
  • 41 Sadek M, Kabnick LS. Are non-tumescent ablation procedures ready to take over?. Phlebology 2014; 29 (01) suppl 55-60
  • 42 Tang TY, Kam JW, Gaunt ME. ClariVein®—early results from a large single-centre series of mechanochemical endovenous ablation for varicose veins. Phlebology 2017; 32 (01) 6-12
  • 43 Elias S, Lam YL, Wittens CH. Mechanochemical ablation: status and results. Phlebology 2013; 28 (Suppl 1) 10-14
  • 44 Bootun R, Lane TR, Dharmarajah B. et al. Intra-procedural pain score in a randomised controlled trial comparing mechanochemical ablation to radiofrequency ablation: The Multicentre Venefit™ versus ClariVein® for varicose veins trial. Phlebology 2016; 31 (01) 61-65
  • 45 Morrison N, Gibson K, McEnroe S. et al. Randomized trial comparing cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins (VeClose). J Vasc Surg 2015; 61 (04) 985-994
  • 46 Frullini A, Fortuna B. Laser assisted foam sclerotherapy (LAFOS): a new approach to the treatment of incompetent saphenous veins. Phlebologie 2013; 66: 51-54
  • 47 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Varicose veins in the legs pathway http://pathways.nice.org.uk/pathways/varicose-veins-in-the-legs. Accessed December 30, 2018
  • 48 Kheirelseid EAH, Crowe G, Sehgal R. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating long-term outcomes of endovenous management of lower extremity varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2018; 6 (02) 256-270
  • 49 Xiao Y, Chen Z, Yuan C. et al. Comparison of long-term result of endovenous laser ablation vs high ligation and stripping for varicosity of great saphenous vein: a meta analysis. Med J Chin People’s Liberation Army 2015; 40 (09) 763-768
  • 50 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J. et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009; 6 (07) e1000100
  • 51 Luebke T, Gawenda M, Heckenkamp J, Brunkwall J. Meta-analysis of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of the great saphenous vein in primary varicosis. J Endovasc Ther 2008; 15 (02) 213-223
  • 52 Xenos ES, Bietz G, Minion DJ. et al. Endoluminal thermal ablation versus stripping of the saphenous vein: meta-analysis of recurrence of reflux. Int J Angiol 2009; 18 (02) 75-78
  • 53 Balint R, Farics A, Parti K. et al. Which endovenous ablation method does offer a better long-term technical success in the treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein? [Review]. Vascular 2016; 24 (06) 649-657
  • 54 Nesbitt C, Bedenis R, Bhattacharya V, Stansby G. Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (07) CD005624
  • 55 Leopardi D, Hoggan BL, Fitridge RA, Woodruff PW, Maddern GJ. Systematic review of treatments for varicose veins. Ann Vasc Surg 2009; 23 (02) 264-276
  • 56 Boersma D, Kornmann VN, van Eekeren RR. et al. Treatment modalities for small saphenous vein insufficiency: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther 2016; 23 (01) 199-211