Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35(04): 410-419
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1694722
Original Research
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Effect of Eyelid Involvement in the Reconstruction of Medial Canthal Defects

Meryem Altin Ekin
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
,
Seyda Karadeniz Ugurlu
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 August 2019 (online)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to present surgical techniques for the reconstruction of medial canthal defects with and without the involvement of the eyelid. This study included 31 patients who underwent medial canthal reconstruction after tumor excision during a 6-year period. Data regarding patient demographics, defect size, tumor pathology, surgery techniques, functional and cosmetic outcomes, and complications were recorded. The reconstructive methods used in the study were divided into groups as per the site of the defect (medial canthal, medial canthal with upper eyelid, medial canthal with lower eyelid, and medial canthal with both eyelids). The most common histopathological diagnosis of the lesions was basal cell carcinoma (74.2%). Postoperative complications (6.4%) included flap necrosis in one patient and lid margin notching in another. Among patients who underwent reconstruction, 8 (25.8%) had only medial canthal defect, 6 (19.3%) had medial canthal defect extending to the upper eyelid, 7 (22.6%) had medial canthal defect extending to the lower eyelid, and 10 (32.3%) had medial canthal defect extending to both the eyelids. The functional outcome was regarded as normal in 30 (96.8%) patients and limited in 1 (3.2%) patient. Cosmetic outcomes were satisfactory in all the patients. The use of alternative reconstructive approaches for different subunits of the medial canthus is an efficient method to achieve superior functional and cosmetic outcomes.

 
  • References

  • 1 Allen RC. Surgical management of periocular cancers: high- and low-risk features drive treatment. Curr Oncol Rep 2017; 19 (09) 57
  • 2 Mathijssen IM, van der Meulen JC. Guidelines for reconstruction of the eyelids and canthal regions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (09) 1420-1433
  • 3 Onishi K, Maruyama Y, Okada E, Ogino A. Medial canthal reconstruction with glabellar combined Rintala flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (02) 537-541
  • 4 Harrington JN. Reconstruction of the medial canthus by spontaneous granulation (Laissez-Faire): a review. Ann Ophthalmol 1982; 14 (10) 956-960 , 963–966, 969–970
  • 5 Sullivan TJ, Bray LC. The bilobed flap in medial canthal reconstruction. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1995; 23 (01) 42-48
  • 6 Ng SGJ, Inkster CF, Leatherbarrow B. The rhomboid flap in medial canthal reconstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85 (05) 556-559
  • 7 Elshamma NA, Al Qabbani A, Alkatan HM, Al-Qattan MM. The use of forehead flaps in the management of large basal cell carcinomas of the medial canthus/medial lower eyelid in Saudi patients. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2013; 27 (03) 223-225
  • 8 Bertelmann E, Rieck P, Guthoff R. Medial canthal reconstruction by a modified glabellar flap. Ophthalmologica 2006; 220 (06) 368-371
  • 9 Goulão J. Medial canthal area reconstruction with horizontal advancement flap. J Dermatolog Treat 2014; 25 (05) 438-440
  • 10 Sciscio A, Joshi N. The transnasal advancement flap: a technique for medial canthal area defects. Orbit 2001; 20 (02) 141-147
  • 11 Tenzel RR, Stewart WB. Eyelid reconstruction by the semicircle flap technique. Ophthalmology 1978; 85 (11) 1164-1169
  • 12 Anderson RL, Gordy DD. The tarsal strip procedure. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97 (11) 2192-2196
  • 13 Lemke BN, Sires BS, Dortzbach RK. A tarsal strip-periosteal flap technique for lateral canthal fixation. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1999; 30 (03) 232-236
  • 14 Hughes WL. A new method for rebuilding of a lower lid. Arch Ophthalmol 1937; 17: 1008-1017
  • 15 Mehta JS, Olver JM. Infraglabellar transnasal bilobed flap in the reconstruction of medial canthal defects. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124 (01) 111-115
  • 16 Perry JD, Taban M. Superiorly based bilobed flap for inferior medial canthal and nasojugal fold defect reconstruction. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 25 (04) 276-279
  • 17 Emsen IM, Benlier E. The use of the superthinned inferior pedicled glabellar flap in reconstruction of small to large medial canthal defect. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19 (02) 500-504
  • 18 Humphreys TR. Repair of the medial canthus following Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg 2014; 40 (Suppl. 09) S96-S102
  • 19 Chang EI, Esmaeli B, Butler CE. Eyelid Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (05) 724e-735e
  • 20 Hishmi AM, Koch KR, Matthaei M, Bölke E, Cursiefen C, Heindl LM. Modified Hughes procedure for reconstruction of large full-thickness lower eyelid defects following tumor resection. Eur J Med Res 2016; 21 (01) 27
  • 21 Leatherbarrow B, Watson A, Wilcsek G. Use of the pericranial flap in medial canthal reconstruction: another application for this versatile flap. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 22 (06) 414-419
  • 22 Anderson RL, Weinstein GS. Full-thickness bipedicle flap for total lower eyelid reconstruction. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105 (04) 570-576
  • 23 Harris GJ. Atlas of Oculofacial Reconstruction: Principles and Techniques for the Repair of Periocular Defects. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009: 1-10
  • 24 Harris GJ. Atlas of Oculofacial Reconstruction: Principles and Techniques for the Repair of Periocular Defects. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009: 103-112
  • 25 Leibovitch I, McNab A, Sullivan T, Davis G, Selva D. Orbital invasion by periocular basal cell carcinoma. Ophthalmology 2005; 112 (04) 717-723
  • 26 Malhotra R, Huilgol SC, Huynh NT, Selva D. The Australian Mohs database, part II: periocular basal cell carcinoma outcome at 5-year follow-up. Ophthalmology 2004; 111 (04) 631-636
  • 27 Lindgren G, Lindblom B, Larkö O. Mohs' micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinomas on the eyelids and medial canthal area. II. Reconstruction and follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000; 78 (04) 430-436
  • 28 Mohs FE. Micrographic surgery for the microscopically controlled excision of eyelid cancers. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104 (06) 901-909
  • 29 Cook Jr BE, Bartley GB. Treatment options and future prospects for the management of eyelid malignancies: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology 2001; 108 (11) 2088-2098 , quiz 2099–2100, 2121
  • 30 Bernardini FP. Management of malignant and benign eyelid lesions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006; 17 (05) 480-484
  • 31 Tierney EP, Hanke CW. Cost effectiveness of Mohs micrographic surgery: review of the literature. J Drugs Dermatol 2009; 8 (10) 914-922
  • 32 Ravitskiy L, Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. Cost analysis: Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg 2012; 38 (04) 585-594
  • 33 Pereira CT, Kruger EA, Sayer G. , et al. Mohs versus surgical excision in nonmelanoma skin cancers: does location matter?. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70 (04) 432-434
  • 34 Mosterd K, Krekels GA, Nieman FH. , et al. Surgical excision versus Mohs' micrographic surgery for primary and recurrent basal-cell carcinoma of the face: a prospective randomised controlled trial with 5-years' follow-up. Lancet Oncol 2008; 9 (12) 1149-1156