Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1696608
Velopharyngeal Closure and Resonance in Children Following Early Cleft Palate Repair: Outcome Measurement
Publication History
Publication Date:
20 September 2019 (online)
Abstract
Introduction Timing of cleft palate repair and the method of speech outcome measurement in children with cleft lip and palate are much debated topics. The associated problems and quality of life in these children depend on the timing of the surgery.
Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the velopharyngeal (VP) function and resonance parameters in children following early cleft palate repair.
Method A total of 25 Kannada-speaking children with early repaired cleft palate were subjected to speech assessment and videofluoroscopic assessment. Perceptual speech parameters measured were severity of hypernasality and presence of nasal air emission. Videofluoroscopy was interpreted in terms of closure ratios to predict the severity of VP dysfunction.
Results The analysis of videofluoroscopic images indicated that 48% of children had complete VP closure and 52% had perceptually normal resonance. A good correlation was found between the closure ratio and hypernasality.
Conclusion Understanding the perceptual speech parameters and their structural correlates for outcome measurement will give better evidence for refining the existing treatment protocols. Data on a larger population are warranted for establishing predictors of optimum speech outcome.
-
References
- 1 Bressmann T, Sader R. Nasality and nasalence. Logopedia 2000; 8: 22-33
- 2 McWilliams BJ, Morris HL, Shelton RL. Cleft Palate Speech. Philadelphia, PA: B.C. Decker; 1990
- 3 Lohmander A, Olsson M. Methodology for perceptual assessment of speech in patients with cleft palate: a critical review of the literature. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004; 41 (01) 64-70
- 4 Sell D. Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: a review. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2005; 40 (02) 103-121
- 5 Sell D, John A, Harding-Bell A, Sweeney T, Hegarty F, Freeman J. Cleft audit protocol for speech (CAPS-A): a comprehensive training package for speech analysis. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2009; 44 (04) 529-548
- 6 Howard S, Heselwood B. Instrumental and perceptual phonetic analyses: the case for two-tier transcriptions. Clin Linguist Phon 2011; 25 (11) (12) 940-948
- 7 Henningsson G, Kuehn DP, Sell D, Sweeney T, Trost-Cardamone JE, Whitehill TL. Speech Parameters Group. Universal parameters for reporting speech outcomes in individuals with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2008; 45 (01) 1-17
- 8 Shprintzen RJ. The velopharyngeal mechanism. In: Berkowitz S. ed. Cleft Lip and Palate: Diagnosis and Management. 2nd ed.. Berlin: Springer; 2005: 643-656
- 9 Hubbard BA, Rice G, Muzaffar AR. Contractility of sphincter pharyngoplasty: relevance to speech outcomes. Can J Plast Surg 2013; 21 (01) 15-18
- 10 Paniagua ML, Collares MV, da Costa SS. Comparative study of three techniques of palatoplasty in patients with cleft of lip and palate via instrumental and auditory-perceptive evaluations. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 14: 18-31
- 11 Lipira AB, Grames LM, Molter D, Govier D, Kane AA, Woo AS. Videofluoroscopic and nasendoscopic correlates of speech in velopharyngeal dysfunction. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2011; 48 (05) 550-560
- 12 Poppelreuter S, Engelke W, Bruns T. Quantitative analysis of the velopharyngeal sphincter function during speech. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2000; 37 (02) 157-165
- 13 Witt PD, Marsh JL, McFarland EG, Riski JE. The evolution of velopharyngeal imaging. Ann Plast Surg 2000; 45 (06) 665-673
- 14 Golding-Kushner KJ, Argamaso RV, Cotton RT. et al. Standardization for the reporting of nasopharyngoscopy and multiview videofluoroscopy: a report from an International Working Group. Cleft Palate J 1990; 27 (04) 337-347 , discussion 347–348
- 15 Birch MJ, Sommerlad BC, Fenn C, Butterworth M. A study of the measurement errors associated with the analysis of velar movements assessed from lateral videofluoroscopic investigations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1999; 36 (06) 499-507
- 16 Kummer AW, Curtis C, Wiggs M, Lee L, Strife JL. Comparison of velopharyngeal gap size in patients with hypernasality, hypernasality and nasal emission, or nasal turbulence (rustle) as the primary speech characteristic. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992; 29 (02) 152-156
- 17 Kummer AW, Briggs M, Lee L. The relationship between the characteristics of speech and velopharyngeal gap size. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2003; 40 (06) 590-596
- 18 Smith BE, Kuehn DP. Speech evaluation of velopharyngeal dysfunction. J Craniofac Surg 2007; 18 (02) 251-261 , quiz 266–267
- 19 Scarmagnani RH, Barbosa DA, Fukushiro AP, Salgado MH, Trindade IEK, Yamashita RP. Relationship between velopharyngeal closure, hypernasality, nasal air emission and nasal rustle in subjects with repaired cleft palate. CoDAS 2015; 27 (03) 267-272
- 20 Kirschner RE, Randall P, Wang P. et al. Cleft palate repair at 3 to 7 months of age. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (06) 2127-2132
- 21 Ha S, Koh KS, Moon H, Jung S, Oh TS. Clinical outcomes of primary palatal surgery in children with non-syndromic cleft palate with and without lip. BioMed Res Int 2015; 2015: 185459
- 22 Brunnegård K, Lohmander A. A cross-sectional study of speech in 10-year-old children with cleft palate: results and issues of rater reliability. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2007; 44 (01) 33-44
- 23 Murthy J, Sendhilnathan S, Hussain SA. Speech outcome following late primary palate repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2010; 47 (02) 156-161
- 24 Hardin-Jones MA, Jones DL. Speech production of preschoolers with cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005; 42 (01) 7-13
- 25 Hortis-Dzierzbicka M, Radkowska E, Fudalej PS. Speech outcomes in 10-year-old children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate after one-stage lip and palate repair in the first year of life. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (02) 175-181
- 26 Rohrich RJ, Gosman AA. An update on the timing of hard palate closure: a critical long-term analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113 (01) 350-352
- 27 Oyama T, Sunakawa H, Arakaki K. et al. Articulation disorders associated with maxillary growth after attainment of normal articulation after primary palatoplasty for cleft palate. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 48 (02) 138-147
- 28 Sell D, Grunwell P, Mildinhall S. et al. Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom–the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Study. Part 3: speech outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001; 38 (01) 30-37
- 29 Sell D, Mildinhall S, Albery L, Wills AK, Sandy JR, Ness AR. The cleft care UK study. Part 4: perceptual speech outcomes. Orthod Craniofac Res 2015; 18 (Suppl. 02) 36-46
- 30 Jayakumar T, Pushpavathi M. Normative Score for Nasometer in Kannada. Student Research at AIISH (Articles Based on Dissertation Done at AIISH) 2015; VII: 44-53
- 31 Birch M, Sommerlad BC, Bhatt A. Image analysis of lateral velopharyngeal closure in repaired cleft palates and normal palates. Br J Plast Surg 1994; 47 (06) 400-405
- 32 Sommerlad BC, Fenn C, Harland K. et al. Submucous cleft palate: a grading system and review of 40 consecutive submucous cleft palate repairs. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004; 41 (02) 114-123
- 33 Lam E, Hundert S, Wilkes GH. Lateral pharyngeal wall and velar movement and tailoring velopharyngeal surgery: determinants of velopharyngeal incompetence resolution in patients with cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (02) 495-505
- 34 Yellinedi R, Damalacheruvu MR. Is there an optimal resting velopharyngeal gap in operated cleft palate patients?. Indian J Plast Surg 2013; 46 (01) 87-91
- 35 Calnan JS. Movements of the soft palate. Br J Plast Surg 1953; 5 (04) 286-296
- 36 Subtelny JD, Baker HK. The significance of adenoid tissue in velopharyngeal function. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 1956; 17 (03) 235-250
- 37 Hubbard BA, Rice GB, Muzaffar AR. Adenoid involvement in velopharyngeal closure in children with cleft palate. Can J Plast Surg 2010; 18 (04) 135-138
- 38 Lohmander-Agerskov A, Söderpalm E, Friede H, Lilja J. A longitudinal study of speech in 15 children with cleft lip and palate treated by late repair of the hard palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1995; 29 (01) 21-31