Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35(05): 476-485
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1696990
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Complications in Reductive Profileplasty

Stephen W. Perkins
1   Meridian Plastic Surgeons, Indianapolis, Indiana
2   Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
,
Scott Shadfar
3   Aesthetic Institute of Oklahoma, Edmond, Oklahoma
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 October 2019 (online)

Abstract

The ability of a surgeon to create an aesthetically pleasing and functionally competent nasal dorsum weighs heavily on following the foundations of rhinoplasty, beginning with the examination and analysis. These same fundamental principles should be used and applied in secondary rhinoplasty. The most common chief complaints of those patients seeking primary rhinoplasty relates to the presence of a hump or dorsal convexity, and similarly complications surrounding the dorsum are the most common indications for secondary rhinoplasty. The surgeon must be able to appropriately evaluate and correct deformities in patients who have already undergone rhinoplasty with dorsal profileplasty. Patients can present with a wide range of postoperative deformities within the bony pyramid or middle vault, including, but not limited to, contour irregularities and internal nasal valve compromise, respectively. The authors will outline the evolving methods by which these techniques can be executed to correct deformities and give a balanced functional and aesthetically pleasing profile.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kamer FM, McQuown SA. Revision rhinoplasty. Analysis and treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114 (03) 257-266
  • 2 Guyuron B, Bokhari F. Patient satisfaction following rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1996; 20 (02) 153-157
  • 3 Moubayed SP, Most SP. Revision of the nasal dorsum. Facial Plast Surg 2017; 33 (02) 202-206
  • 4 Perkins SW. Rhinoplasty: Thomas Procedures in Facial Plastic Surgery. Shelton, CT: People's Medical Publishing House; 2011
  • 5 Shadfar S, Perkins SW. A goal-oriented approach to secondary rhinoplasty. In: Rohrich RJ, Ahmad J. , eds. Secondary Rhinoplasty by the Global Masters. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2017: 1392-1426
  • 6 Dobratz EJ, Hilger PA. Osteotomies. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (02) 301-311
  • 7 Sandel IV HD, Perkins SW. Management of the short nose deformity in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24 (03) 310-326
  • 8 Toriumi DM. Autogenous grafts are worth the extra time. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 126 (04) 562-564
  • 9 Lee MR, Unger JG, Rohrich RJ. Management of the nasal dorsum in rhinoplasty: a systematic review of the literature regarding technique, outcomes, and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (05) 538e-550e
  • 10 Daniel RK, Sajadian A. Secondary rhinoplasty: management of the overresected dorsum. Facial Plast Surg 2012; 28 (04) 417-426
  • 11 Shadfar S, Farag A, Jarchow AM, Shockley WW. Safety and efficacy of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene implants in the surgical management of traumatic nasal deformity. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 141 (08) 710-715
  • 12 Webster RC, Davidson TM, Smith RC. Curved lateral osteotomy for airway protection in rhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103 (08) 454-458
  • 13 Loyo M, Wang TD. Management of the deviated nasal dorsum. Facial Plast Surg 2015; 31 (03) 216-227
  • 14 Cobo R. Correction of dorsal abnormalities in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24 (03) 327-338
  • 15 Toriumi DM. Management of the middle vault in rhinoplasty. Oper Tech Plas Reconstr Surg 1995; 2 (01) 16-30
  • 16 Brenner MJ, Hilger PA. Grafting in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2009; 17 (01) 91-113 , vii vii.
  • 17 Perkins SW. The evolution of the combined use of endonasal and external columellar approaches to rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2004; 12 (01) 35-50
  • 18 Boccieri A, Macro C, Pascali M. The use of spreader grafts in primary rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55 (02) 127-131
  • 19 Park SS. The flaring suture to augment the repair of the dysfunctional nasal valve. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101 (04) 1120-1122
  • 20 Shadfar S, Shockley WW, Fleischman GM. , et al. Characterization of postoperative changes in nasal airflow using a cadaveric computational fluid dynamics model: supporting the internal nasal valve. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2014; 16 (05) 319-327
  • 21 Sheen JH. Spreader graft: a method of reconstructing the roof of the middle nasal vault following rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984; 73 (02) 230-239
  • 22 Gruber RP, Melkun ET, Woodward JF, Perkins SW. Dorsal reduction and spreader flaps. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (04) 456-464
  • 23 Moubayed SP, Most SP. The autospreader flap for midvault reconstruction following dorsal hump resection. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (01) 36-41
  • 24 Porter JP, Toriumi DM. Surgical techniques for management of the crooked nose. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002; 26 (Suppl. 01) S18
  • 25 Cakmak O, Buyuklu F. Crushed cartilage grafts for concealing irregularities in rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007; 9 (05) 352-357
  • 26 Bujía J. Determination of the viability of crushed cartilage grafts: clinical implications for wound healing in nasal surgery. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32 (03) 261-265
  • 27 Rudderman RH, Guyuron B, Mendelsohn G. The fate of fresh and preserved, noncrushed and crushed autogenous cartilage in the rabbit model. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32 (03) 250-254
  • 28 Yilmaz S, Erçöçen AR, Can Z, Yenidünya S, Edali N, Yormuk E. Viability of diced, crushed cartilage grafts and the effects of Surgicel (oxidized regenerated cellulose) on cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (04) 1054-1060 , discussion 1061–1062
  • 29 Sajjadian A, Rubinstein R, Naghshineh N. Current status of grafts and implants in rhinoplasty: part I. Autologous grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (02) 40e-49e
  • 30 Cakmak O, Bircan S, Buyuklu F, Tuncer I, Dal T, Ozluoglu LN. Viability of crushed and diced cartilage grafts: a study in rabbits. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005; 7 (01) 21-26
  • 31 Cakmak O, Buyuklu F, Yilmaz Z, Sahin FI, Tarhan E, Ozluoglu LN. Viability of cultured human nasal septum chondrocytes after crushing. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005; 7 (06) 406-409
  • 32 Tardy Jr ME, Denneny III J, Fritsch MH. The versatile cartilage autograft in reconstruction of the nose and face. Laryngoscope 1985; 95 (05) 523-533
  • 33 Guyuron B, DeLuca L, Lash R. Supratip deformity: a closer look. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (03) 1140-1151 , discussion 1152–1153
  • 34 Hussein WK, Foda HM. Pollybeak deformity in middle eastern rhinoplasty: prevention and treatment. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (04) 398-401
  • 35 Hamilton III GS. Dorsal failures: from saddle deformity to pollybeak. Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34 (03) 261-269
  • 36 Ozucer B, Yildirim YS, Veyseller B. , et al. Effect of postrhinoplasty taping on postoperative edema and nasal draping: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (03) 157-163
  • 37 Guyuron B, Lee M. An effective algorithm for management of noses with thick skin. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017; 41 (02) 381-387
  • 38 Tardy Jr ME, Schwartz M, Parras G. Saddle nose deformity: autogenous graft repair. Facial Plast Surg 1989; 6 (02) 121-134
  • 39 Daniel RK. Rhinoplasty: septal saddle nose deformity and composite reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (03) 1029-1043
  • 40 Pribitkin EA, Ezzat WH. Classification and treatment of the saddle nose deformity. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009; 42 (03) 437-461
  • 41 Ostby E, Inman J, Ardeshirpour F. Use of tissue expander for contracted scarred saddle deformity rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35 (01) 68-72
  • 42 Anderson JR. A reasoned approach to nasal base surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 1984; 110 (06) 349-358
  • 43 Kridel RW, Konior RJ. Controlled nasal tip rotation via the lateral crural overlay technique. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117 (04) 411-415