CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2008; 02(01): 11-17
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697347
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Microtensile and Microshear Bond Strength of an Antibacterial Self-Etching System to Primary Tooth Dentin

Sibel Yıldırım
a   Associate professor, Selcuk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Konya, Turkey.
,
Gül Tosun
b   Assistant professor, Selcuk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Konya, Turkey.
,
Alp Erdin Koyutürk
c   Assistant professor, On Dokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Samsun, Turkey.
,
Yaḡmur Ṣener
a   Associate professor, Selcuk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Konya, Turkey.
,
Abdulkadir Ṣengün
d   Associate professor, Selcuk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Konya, Turkey.
,
Füsun Özer
e   Professor, Selcuk University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Konya, Turkey.
,
Satoshi Imazato
f   Professor, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontology, Japan.
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 October 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the bonding ability of antibacterial bonding system to primary dentin was not different from the parental material which did not contain any antibacterial component.

Methods: Extracted human non-carious primary molars were ground to expose the coronal dentin, and then randomly divided into two experimental groups: treatment with Clearfil Protect Bond or with Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray Medical Inc.). Composite-dentin sticks with a cross-sectional area of approximately 0.90 mm2 were prepared and subsequently subjected to microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and microshear bond strength (μSBS) tests. For the μTBS tests, specimens were attached to an Instron testing machine with a cyanoacrylate adhesive. For μSBS testing, the sticks were mechanically fixed to the μSBS testing apparatus. The bonds were stressed in shear or tension at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min until failure occurred. Resin-dentin interfaces produced by each system were examined using SEM. The data were analyzed with Mann-Whitney’s U test.

Results: The μTBS and μSBS of Clearfil Protect Bond were 30.69±9.71 and 9.94±3.78 MPa, respectively. Clearfil SE Bond showed significantly greater values of 37.31±9.57 and 12.83±3.15 MPa, respectively. SEM analysis demonstrated similar micro-morphological features including the thickness of the hybrid layer for both materials.

Conclusions: It was showed that antibacterial self-etching system Clearfil Protect Bond showed lower bond strength values compared to primary dentin than that of to Clearfil SE Bond on primary dentin. (Eur J Dent 2008;2:11-17)

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Bergenhotlz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11: 439-450
  • 2 Brännström M. The cause of postrestorative sensitivity and its prevention. J Endod 1986; 12: 475-481
  • 3 Imazato S. Antibacterial properties of resin composites and dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 449-457
  • 4 Imazato S, Ehara A, Torii M, Ebisu S. Antibacterial activity of dentin primer containing MDPB after curing. J Dent 1998; 26: 267-271
  • 5 Imazato S, Kinomoto Y, Tarumi H, Torii M, Russell RRB, McCabe JF. Incorporation of antibacterial monomer MDPB in dentin primer. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 768-772
  • 6 Imazato S, Kaneko T, Takahashi Y, Noiri Y, Ebisu S. In vivo antibacterial effects of dentin primer incorporating MDPB. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 369-375
  • 7 Imazato S, Torii Y, Takatsuka T, Inoue K, Ebi N, Ebisu S. Bactericidal effect of dentin primer containing antibacterial monomer metacryloyloxydodecylpridium bromide (MDPB) against bacteria in human carious dentin. J Oral Rehab 2001; 28: 314-319
  • 8 Daronch M, De Goes MF, Grande RHM, Chan DCN. Antibacterial and conventional self-etching primer system: morphological evaluation of intact primary enamel. J Clin Ped Dent 2003; 27: 251-256
  • 9 Sano H, Sonoda H, Shono T, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley D. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength evaluation of a microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 236-240
  • 10 Shimida Y, Senawongse P, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF, Nakaoki Y, Tagami J. Bond strength of two adhesive systems to primary and permanent enamel. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 403-409
  • 11 Kameyama A, Shuto S, Muto Y, Sazuka H, Ushiki T, Hosaka M, Hirai Y. Studies on an MDPB-containing experimental resin bonding system-Part 1 Early bond strength of PB to bovine dentin. Jpn J Conservative Dent 2000; 44: 311-317
  • 12 Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Bond strengths and microleakage of new adhesive systems. In: Yoshiyama M, Nishitani Y, Nakabo S, Cox CF. eds. Modern Trends in Adhesive Dentistry Proceedings of the Adhesive Dentistry Forum 2001 in Okayama, Japan. Tokyo: Kuraray Medical Inc.; 1999: 15-29
  • 13 Imazato S, Kinomoto Y, Tarumi H, Ebisu S, Tay FR. Antibacterial activity and bonding characteristics of an adhesive resin containing antibacterial monomer MDPB. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 313-319
  • 14 Fujisawa S, Kadoma Y. Effect of phenolic compounds on the polymerization of methyl methacrylate. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 324-326
  • 15 Nakornchai S, Harnirattisai C, Surarit R, Thiradilok S. Microtensile bond strength of a total-etching versus selfetching adhesive to caries-affected and intact dentin in primary teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136: 477-483
  • 16 Ikemura K, Tay FR, Hironaka T, Endo T, Pashley DH. Bonding mechanism and ultrastructural interfacial analysis of a single-step adhesive to dentin. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 707-715
  • 17 Nakajima M, Ogata M, Harada N, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Bond strengths of self-etching primer adhesives to in vitro-demineralized dentin following mineralizing treatment. J AdhesDent 2000; 2: 29-38
  • 18 Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: a SEM investigation. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 422-429
  • 19 Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 117-125
  • 20 De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Inoue S, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Microtensile bond strengths of one-and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 414-420
  • 21 Doi J, Itota T, Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Bonding to root caries by a self-etching adhesive system containing MDPB. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 89-93
  • 22 Abdalla AI. Microtensile and tensile bond strength of single-bottle adhesives: a new test method. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 379-384
  • 23 Takahashi A, Sato Y, Uno S, Pereira PN, Sano H. Effects of mechanical properties of adhesive resins on bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 263-268
  • 24 Fowler CS, Swartz ML, Moore BK, Rhodes BF. Influence of selected variables on adhesion testing. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 265-269
  • 25 McDonough WG, Antonucci JM, He J, Shimada Y, Chiang MY, Schumacher GE, Schultheisz CR. A microshear test to measure bond strengths of dentin-polymer interfaces. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 3603-3608
  • 26 Chan KM, Tay FR, King NM, Imazato S, Pashley DH. Bonding of mild self-etching primers/adhesives to dentin with thick smear layers. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 340-346
  • 27 Sumikawa DA, Marshall GW, Gee L, Marshall S. Microstructure of primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent 1999; 21: 439-444
  • 28 Hirayama A, Yamada M, Miake K. An electron microscopic study on dentinal tubules of human deciduous teeth. Shika Gakuho 1986; 86: 1021-1031
  • 29 Johnsen DC. Comparison of primary and permanent teeth. In: Avery JA. eds Oral development and histology. Philadelphia: BC Decker; 1999: 180-190
  • 30 Koutsi V, Noonan RG, Horner JA, Simpson MD, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. The effect of dentin depth on the permeability and ultrastructure of primary molars. Pediatr Dent 1994; 16: 29-35
  • 31 Olmez A, Oztas N, Basak F, Erdal S. Comparison of the resin dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998; 22: 293-298
  • 32 Burrow MF, Nopnakeepong U. Phrukkanon. A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 239-245
  • 33 Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Harada N, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Shear and tensile bond testing for resin cement evaluation. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 298-304
  • 34 Van Noort R, Cardew GE, Howard IC, Noroozi S. The effect of local geometry on the measurement of tensile bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 889-893
  • 35 Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew GE. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 1989; 17: 61-67
  • 36 Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Tokyo: Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd.; 1998: 34
  • 37 Imazato S, Ebi N, Tarumi H, Russell RR, Kaneko T, Ebisu S. Bactericidal activity and cytotoxicity of antibacterial monomer MDPB. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 899-903