Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2008; 02(02): 091-095
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697361
Editorial
Dental Investigation Society

Apical Leakage of Epiphany Root Canal Sealer Combined with Different Master Cones

Mustafa Murat Kocak
a   DDS, PhD, Private Practice, Turkey
,
Ozgur Er
b   DDS, PhD, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkey
,
Baran Can Saglam
c   DDS, Research assistant, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gazi, Ankara, Turkey
,
Sis Yaman
d   DDS, PhD, Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gazi, Ankara, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 October 2019 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the apical sealing ability of different core materials used with Epiphany™ sealer and to evaluate the effect of Resilon/Epiphany™ system on creating an apical mono-block seal.

Methods: Fifty-five extracted human teeth were used. Forty-five were selected and randomly divided into three groups and ten teeth were used as positive and negative control groups. In Group 1, roots were obturated using Resilon™ and Epiphany™, In Group 2, roots were obturated using tapered single-cone gutta-percha and Epiphany™ and in Group 3, roots were obturated using Thermafil obturators and Epiphany™ sealer. The apical leakage was measured using the dye penetration methodology. The teeth were cleared, and the linear extent of dye penetration was measured with a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed by the one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests.

Results: The teeth filled with Thermafil obturators and Epiphany™ sealer displayed the most apical leakage. The least apical leakage was shown with Resilon™ and Epiphany™. Groups 1 and 2 had significantly leaked less than Group 3.

Conclusions: Based on the data of this study, although Resilon™ and Epiphany™ sealer showed the least apical leakage, statistical analysis showed no difference between gutta-percha and Epiphany™. (Eur J Dent 2008;2:91-95)

Key words:

Dye penetration - Apical leakage - Root-canal filling - Resilon™
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Swanson K, Madison S. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth Part 1. Time periods. J Endod 1987; 13: 56-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Madison S, Wilcox LR. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth Part III. In vivo study. J Endod 1988; 14: 455-458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Yücel AC, Çiftçi A. Effects of different root canal obturation techniques on bacterial penetration. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: 88-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hommez GM, Coppens CR, De Moor RJ. Periapical health related to the quality of coronal restorations and root fillings. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 680-689
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Saunders WP, Saunders EM. Assessment of leakage in the restored pulpal chamber of endodontically treated multirooted teeth. Int Endod J 1990; 23: 28-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Monticelli F, Sword J, Martin RL, Schuster GS, Weller RN, Ferrari M, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Sealing properties of two contemporary single-cone obturation systems. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 374-385
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hovland EJ, Dumsha TC. Leakage evaluation in vitro of the root canal sealer cement Sealapex. Int Endod J 1985; 18: 179-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Budd CS, Weller RN, Kulild JC. A comparison of thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha obturation techniques. J Endod 1991; 17: 260-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Canalda-Sahli C, Berastegui-Jimeno E, Brau-Aguade E. Apical sealing using two thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques compared with lateral condensation. J Endod 1997; 23: 636-638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Collins J, Walker MP, Kulild J, Lee C. A comparison of three gutta-percha obturation techniques to replicate canal irregularities. J Endod 2006; 32: 762-765
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Veis AA, Molyvdas IA, Lambrianidis TP, Beltes PG. In vitro evaluation of apical leakage of root canal fillings after in situ obturation with thermoplasticized and laterally condensed gutta-percha. Int Endod J 1994; 27: 213-217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gutmann JL, Saunders WP, Saunders EM, Nguyen L. An assessment of the plastic Thermafil obturation technique: part 1 radiographic evaluation of adaptation and placement. Int Endod J 1993; 26: 173-178
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Paque’ F, Musch U, Hülsmann M. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Int Endod J 2005; 38: 8-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Weiger R, El Ayouti A, Löst C. Efficiency of hand and rotary instruments in shaping oval root canals. J Endod 2002; 28: 580-583
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bal AS, Hicks ML, Barnett F. Comparison of laterally condensed .06 and .02 tapered gutta-percha and sealer in vitro. J Endod 2001; 27: 786-788
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wu M-K, Wesselink PR. A primary observation on the preparation and obturation of oval canals. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 137-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Wu MK, Roris A, Barkis D, Wesselink PR. Prevalence and extent of long oval canals in the apical third. OralSurg Oral Med Oral Pathol (in press)
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Wu M-K, Wesselink PR. Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered. Part I. Methodology, application and relevance. Int Endod J 1993; 26: 37-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Starkey DL, Anderson RW, Pashley DH. An evaluation of the effect of methylene blue dye pH on apical lekage. J Endod 1993; 19: 453-459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Wu MK, De Gee AJ, Wesselink PR, Moorer WR. Fluid transport and bacterial penetration along root canal fillings. Int Endod J 1994; 26: 203-208
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Czonstkowsky M, Michanowicz A, Vazquez JA. Evaluation of an injection of thermoplasticized low-temperature guttapercha using radioactive isotopes. J Endod 1985; 11: 71-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Delivanis PD, Chapman KA. Comparison and reliability of techniques for measuring leakage and marginal penetration. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 53: 410-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Matloff IR, Jensen JR, Singer L, Tabibi A. A comparison of methods used in root canal sealibility studies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 53: 203-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 De Moor RJG, Martens LC. Apical microleakage after lateral condensation, hybrid gutta-percha condensation and Soft-Core obturation: an in vitro evaluation. End Dent Traumatol 1999; 15: 239-243
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Barthel CR, Moshonov J, Shuping G, Orstavik D. Bacterial leakage versus dye leakage in obturated root canals. Int Endod J 1999; 32: 370-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Camps J, Pashley D. Reliability of the dye penetration studies. J Endod 2003; 29: 592-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kersten HW, Moorer WR. Particles and molecules in endodontic leakage. Int Endod J 1989; 22: 118-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bodrumlu E, Tunga U. apical leakage of resilon™ obturation material. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7: 45-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Haikel Y, Wittenmeyer W, Bateman G, Bentaleb A, Allemann C. A new method for the quantitative analysis of endodontic microleakage. J Endod 1999; 25: 172-177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Pommel L, About I, Pashley D, Camps J. Apical leakage of four endodontic sealers. J Endod 2003; 29: 208-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Shipper G, Orstavik D, Teixeira FB, Trope M. An evaluation of microbial leakage in roots filled with a thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based root canal filling material (Resilon™). J Endod 2004; 30: 342-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Raina R, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Evaluation of the quality of the apical seal in Resilon/ Epiphany and Gutta-Percha/AH Plus-filled root canals by using a fluid filtration approach. J Endod 2007; 33: 944-947
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Paqué F, Sirtes G. Apical sealing ability of Resilon/Epiphany versus gutta-percha/AH Plus: immediate and 16-months leakage. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 722-729
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gulsahi K, Cehreli ZC, Onay EO, Tasman-Dagli F, Ungor M. Comparison of the area of resin-based sealer and voids in roots obturated with Resilon and gutta-percha. J Endod 2007; 33: 1338-1341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Verissimo DM, do Vale MS, Monteiro AJ. Comparison of apical leakage between canals filled with gutta-percha/AH-Plus and the Resilon/Epiphany System, when submitted to two filling techniques. J Endod 2007; 33: 291-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar