CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2009; 03(01): 32-41
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697403
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Adhesion to Primary and Permanent Dentin and a Simple Model Approach

Deniz C. Can-Karabulut
a   PhD, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University, Mersin, Turkey
,
Firdevs Tulga Oz
b   Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ankara, Ankara, Turkey
,
Baris Karabulut
c   PhD, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ankara, Ankara, Turkey
,
Inci Batmaz
d   Associate Professor, Department of Statistics, Art and Sciences Faculty, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
,
Ozlem Ilk
e   PhD, Department of Statistics, Art and Sciences Faculty, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
27. September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objectives: First to compare different dentin bonding agents’ shear bond strength to primary and permanent dentin. Secondly to compare the fracture failure modes and making an attempt to develop a statistical model that could be helpful in predicting them.

Methods: Extracted human primary and permanent molars were used as substrates (dentin). The shear bond strength of composite to substrate was measured and fracture surfaces were evaluated visually and with stereomicroscope. Using the data obtained, a statistical model was built in order to predict the failure modes.

Results: Higher bond strength values were obtained for permanent dentin. Total-etch adhesives displayed higher shear bond strength values than the self-etch adhesive. Adhesive failures were more frequently seen in primary dentin. Self-etch adhesive system displayed more adhesive failures. Prepared model confirmed the negative relationship between shear bond strength and the probability of observing adhesive failure.

Conclusions: There should be an application protocol for the usage of dentin bonding agents in primary dentin. Further development of statistical and fuzzy models for failure modes can be supportive alternatives for microscopic evaluations and also be helpful in understanding and eliminating the factors which are responsible for the formation of adhesive failures and for achieving clinically more successful adhesive restorations. (Eur J Dent 2009;3:32-41)

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Perdigao J. Dentin bonding as a function of dentin structure. Dent Clin North Am 2002; 46: 277-301
  • 2 Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 2001; Suppl (Suppl. 06) 119-144
  • 3 Uekusa S, Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki M, Tsubota K, Kurokawa H, Hosoya Y. Bonding efficacy of single-step self-etch systems to sound primary and permanent tooth dentin. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 569-576
  • 4 Al-Salehi SK, Burke FJ. Methods used in dentin bonding tests: An analysis of 50 investigations on bond strength. Quint Int 1997; 28: 717-723
  • 5 Price RB, Hall GC. In vitro comparison of 10-minute versus 24-hour shear bond strengths of six dentin bonding systems. Quint Int 1999; 30: 122-134
  • 6 Korkmaz Y, Baseren M. Effect of antibacterial varnishes applied to root dentin on shear bond strength of tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 65-71
  • 7 Schneider BT, Baumann MA, Watanabe LG, Marshall Jr GW. Dentin shear bond strength of compomers and composites. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 15-19
  • 8 SPSS for Windows, Rel. 15.0.1. 2006. Chicago: SPSS Inc;
  • 9 Hosmer DW, Lemeshow jr S.. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley; 2000
  • 10 Myers RH. Classical and Modern Regression with Applications. Brooks: Cole Publishing Co; 2000
  • 11 Sumikawa DA, Marshall GW, Gee L, Marshall SJ. Microstructure of primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent 1999; 21: 439-444
  • 12 Agostini FG, Kaaden C, Powers JM. Bond strength of selfetching primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23: 481-486
  • 13 Araujo FB, Garcia-Godoy F, Issao M. A comparison of three resin bonding agents to primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent 1997; 19: 253-257
  • 14 Nör JE, Feigal RJ, Dennison JB, Edwards CA. Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the resin-dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1396-1403
  • 15 Mazzeo N, Ott NW, Hondrum SO. Resin bonding to primary teeth using three adhesive systems. Pediatr Dent 1995; 17: 112-115
  • 16 Ibarra G, Vargas MA, Armstrong SR, Cobb DS. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to ground and unground enamel. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4: 115-124
  • 17 Öztaṣ N, Ölmez A. Effects of one versus two applications of a self-etching adhesive to dentin of primary teeth: a SEM study. J Contemp Dent Prac 2005; 6: 18-25
  • 18 Naughton WT, Latta MA. Bond strength of composite to dentin using self-etching adhesive systems. Quint Int 2005; 36: 259-262
  • 19 Strydom C. Self-etching adhesives: review of adhesion to tooth structure part I. SADJ 2004; 59: 413-419
  • 20 Swift Jr EJ. Dentin/enamel adhesives: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 456-461
  • 21 Christensen GJ. Self-etching primers are here. JADA 2001; 132: 1041-1043
  • 22 Bekes K, Boeckler L, Gernhardt CR, Schaller HG. Clinical performance of a self-etching and a total-etch adhesive system-2-year results. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34: 855-861
  • 23 Marquezan M, da Silveira BL, Burnett Jr LH, Rodrigues CR, Kramer PF. Microtensile bond strength of contemporary adhesives to primary enamel and dentin. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008; 32: 127-132
  • 24 Bolanos-Carmona V, López S, De Haro-Munoz C, Briones-Lujan MT. Interfacial morphology and bond strength of self-etching adhesives to primary dentin with or without acid etching. J Biomed Maters Res Part B App Biomat 2008 In press
  • 25 Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J 2005; 24: 1-13
  • 26 Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. “Nobottle” vs “multi-bottle” dentin adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 373-380
  • 27 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-235
  • 28 Courson F, Bouter D, Ruse ND, Degrange M. Bond strengths of nine current dentine adhesive systems to primary and permanent teeth. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 296-303
  • 29 De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 118-132
  • 30 Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C, Meyer JM. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 2001; 29: 55-61
  • 31 Sensi LG, Lopes GC, Monteiro S, Baratieri LN, Vieira LC. Dentin bond strength of self-etching primers/adhesives. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 63-68
  • 32 Leloup G, D’Hoore W, Bouter D, Degrange M, Vreven J. Meta-analytical review of factors involved in dentin adherence. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 1605-1614
  • 33 Gürgan S, Kiremitci A, Cakir FY, Yazici E, Gorucu J, Gutknecht N. Shear bond strength of composite bonded to erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser-prepared dentin. Lasers Med Sci 2007 Dec 12 [Epub ahead of print]
  • 34 Titley KC, Chernecky R, Rossouw PE, Kulkami GV. The effect of various storage methods and media on shear bond strengths of dental composite resin to bovine dentin. Arch Oral Biol 1998; 43: 305-311
  • 35 De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, Lambrects P, Vanherle G. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 136-140
  • 36 Inoue S, Vargas MA, Yoshida Y, Lambrects P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 237-245
  • 37 Nikaido T, Kunzelmann KH, Chen H, Ogata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Cox CF, Hickel R, Tagami J. Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical and loading on bond strength of a self-etching primer system to dentin. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 269-275
  • 38 Moll K, Fritzenschaft A, Haller B. In vitro comparison of dentin bonding systems: Effect of testing method and operator. Quint Int 2004; 35: 845-852
  • 39 Rueggeberg FA. Substrate for adhesion testing to tooth structure-Review of the literature. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 2-10
  • 40 Dong CC, McComb D, Anderson JD, Tam L. Effect of mode of polymerization of bonding agent on shear bond strength of autocured resin composite luting cements. J Can Dent Assoc 2003; 69: 229-234
  • 41 Tantbirojn D, Cheng YS, Versluis A, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Nominal shear or fracture mechanics in the assessment of composite dentin adhesion?. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 41-48
  • 42 Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The shear bond strength of bidirectional and random-oriented fibre-reinforced composite to tooth structure. J Dent 2005; 33: 509-516 Epub 2005 Mar 5
  • 43 Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 1989; 17: 61-67
  • 44 Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin?. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1298-1307
  • 45 DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ, Wang Z. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the bond strength of the shear bond test. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 126-131
  • 46 Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Effect of crosssectional surface area on bond strengths between resin and dentin. Dent Mater 1998; 14: 120-128
  • 47 Price RB, Doyle G, Murphy D. Effects of composite thickness on the shear bond strength to dentin. J Can Dent Assoc 2000; 66: 35-39
  • 48 Windley 3rd W, Ritter A, Trope M. The effect of short-term calcium hydroxide treatment on dentin bond strengths to composite resin. Dental Traumatol 2003; 19: 79-84
  • 49 Triolo PT, Swift EJ. Shear bond strengths of ten dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 370-374
  • 50 Mason PN, Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Davidson CL. Shear bond strength of four dentinal adhesives applied in vivo and in vitro. J Dent 1996; 24: 217-222
  • 51 Perdigao J, May KN, Wilder AD, Lopes M. The effect of depth of dentin demineralization on bond strengths and morphology of the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 186-194
  • 52 Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1396-1399
  • 53 Al Qahtani MQ, Platt JA, Moore BK, Cochran MA. The effect on shear bond strength of rewetting dry dentin with two desensitizers. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 287-296
  • 54 Price RB, Derand T, Andreou P, Murphy D. The effect of configuration factors, time and thermal cycling on resin to dentin bond strengths. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 1013-1021
  • 55 Watanabe LG, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ. Dentin shear strength: effects of tubule orientation and intratooth location. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 109-115
  • 56 Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama CarvalhoRM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: A review. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 117-125