RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697610
Accelerometer-Based Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty for the Management of Extra-Articular Deformity and Retained Femoral Hardware: Analysis of Component Alignment
Publikationsverlauf
27. Juli 2018
07. August 2019
Publikationsdatum:
11. Oktober 2019 (online)
Abstract
Purpose Recent advances in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include an accelerometer portable system designed to improve component position and alignment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether accelerometer navigation system can be a valuable option in complex TKAs for extra-articular deformity of the lower limb or in case of retained femoral hardware.
Methods A group of 13 patients underwent TKA with an accelerometer navigation system. Three patients had a tibial extra-articular deformity, six had a femoral extra-articular deformity, and four had an intramedullary nail in the femur. Preoperative and postoperative mechanical axes were measured from full-length lower extremity radiographs to evaluate alignment. The alignment of prosthetic components in the frontal and sagittal planes was determined by postoperative radiographs.
Results At 30-days postoperative radiographic check, the hip knee ankle angle was within 2.0° (0 ± 1) of the neutral mechanical axis. The alignment of the tibial component on the frontal plane was 90.0° (range 89–91) and on the sagittal plane 5.0° (range 3–7). The alignment of the femoral component on the frontal plane was 90.0° (range 89–91) and on the sagittal plane 3.0° (range 0–5).
Conclusion The alignment of the prosthetic components has been accurate and comparable to other navigation systems in literature without any increase in surgical times. The accelerometer-based navigation system is therefore a useful technique that can be used to optimize TKA alignment in patients with extra-articular deformity or with lower limb hardware, where the intramedullary guides cannot be applied.
Level of Evidence This is an observational study without a control group, Level III.
-
References
- 1 Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976; 58A: 754-765
- 2 Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA. Total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (192) 13-22
- 3 Ranawat CS, Boachie-Adjei O. Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Eight- to 11-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (226) 6-13
- 4 Knutson K, Lewold S, Robertsson O, Lidgren L. The Swedish knee arthroplasty register. A nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976-1992. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65 (04) 375-386
- 5 Buechel Sr FF. Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; (404) 40-50
- 6 Callahan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA, Dittus RS. Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1994; 271 (17) 1349-1357
- 7 Civinini R, Carulli C, Matassi F, Villano M, Innocenti M. Total knee arthroplasty after complex tibial plateau fractures. Chir Organi Mov 2009; 93 (03) 143-147
- 8 Whiteside LA. Principles of ligament balancing and alignment in total knee arthroplasty. In: Parvizi J, Cashman J, Goyal N, Morrey MC, Restrepo C. The Knee: reconstruction, replacement and revision. Towson: Data Trace Publishing Company; 2013. 51(1): 51-23
- 9 Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (01) 45-53
- 10 Wang JW, Wang CJ. Total knee arthroplasty for arthritis of the knee with extra-articular deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84 (10) 1769-1774
- 11 Graves SE, Davidson D, Ingerson L. , et al. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Med J Aust 2004; 180 (5, Suppl): S31-S34
- 12 Papadopoulos EC, Parvizi J, Lai CH, Lewallen DG. Total knee arthroplasty following prior distal femoral fracture. Knee 2002; 9 (04) 267-274
- 13 Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M. , et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (02) 261-269
- 14 Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK. Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (06) 1177-1182
- 15 Rebal BA, Babatunde OM, Lee JH, Geller JA, Patrick Jr DA, Macaulay W. Imageless computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty provides superior short term functional outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (05) 938-944
- 16 Kuo CC, Bosque J, Meehan JP, Jamali AA. Computer-assisted navigation of total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in a patient with severe posttraumatic femoral deformity. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (06) 976.e17-976.e20
- 17 Klein GR, Austin MS, Smith EB, Hozack WJ. Total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation in patients with deformities of the femur and tibia. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (02) 284-288
- 18 Liu Z, Pan X, Zhang X. Total knee arthroplasty using navigation system for severe osteoarthritis with extra-articular deformity. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2013; 23 (01) 93-96
- 19 Kamara E, Berliner ZP, Hepinstall MS, Cooper HJ. Pin site complications associated with computer-assisted navigation in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (09) 2842-2846
- 20 Minoda Y, Watanabe K, Iwaki H, Takahashi S, Fukui M, Nakamura H. Theoretical risk of anterior femoral cortex notching in total knee arthroplasty using a navigation system. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (09) 1533-1537
- 21 Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H. , et al. The risk of notching the anterior femoral cortex with the use of navigation systems in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (06) 718-722
- 22 Jenny JY, Miehlke RK, Giurea A. Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement. A multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres. Knee 2008; 15 (02) 80-84
- 23 Jenny JY, Picard F. Learning navigation—learning with navigation. A review. SICOT J 2017; 3: 39
- 24 Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt PF. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee 2002; 9 (03) 173-180
- 25 Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464 (464) 111-116
- 26 Kim SM, Park YS, Ha CW, Lim SJ, Moon YW. Robot-assisted implantation improves the precision of component position in minimally invasive TKA. Orthopedics 2012; 35 (09) e1334-e1339
- 27 Mattei L, Pellegrino P, Calò M, Bistolfi A, Castoldi F. Patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a state of the art. Ann Transl Med 2016; 4 (07) 126
- 28 Lionberger DR, Crocker CL, Chen V. Patient specific instrumentation. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (09) 1699-1704
- 29 Roh YW, Kim TW, Lee S, Seong SC, Lee MC. Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (12) 3988-3995
- 30 Chan WC, Pinder E, Loeffler M. Patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2016; 24 (02) 175-178
- 31 Chen JY, Chin PL, Tay DK, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Functional outcome and quality of life after patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (10) 1724-1728
- 32 Lin WP, Lin J, Horng LC, Chang SM, Jiang CC. Quadriceps-sparing, minimal-incision total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (07) 1024-1032
- 33 Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Ruh EL. , et al. Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (03) 889-894
- 34 Kinney MC, Cidambi KR, Severns DL, Gonzales FB. Comparison of the iAssist handheld guidance system to conventional instruments for mechanical axis restoration in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (01) 61-66
- 35 Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park SD. The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (02) 379-385