Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2010; 04(02): 110-117
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1697818
Original Article
European Journal of Dentistry

Effect of Different Bonding Strategies on Adhesion to Deep and Superficial Permanent Dentin

Rafael Eduardo Fernandes Pegado
a   Faculdade de Odontologia e Centro de Pesquisas Odontológicas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Flávia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral
b   Faculdade de Odontologia e Centro de Pesquisas Odontológicas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Flávia Martão Flório
c   Faculdade de Odontologia e Centro de Pesquisas Odontológicas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Roberta Tarkany Basting
d   Faculdade de Odontologia e Centro de Pesquisas Odontológicas São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of different bonding strategies on the microtensile bond strength to deep and superficial permanent dentin.

Methods: Forty-eight teeth were randomly flattened according to the dentin depth: superficial dentin (SD) and deep dentin (DD). Subsequently, three adhesive systems were applied (n=8): an etchand- rinse (Adper Single Bond 2 - SB), a “mild” two-step self-etching (Clearfil SE Bond - SE) and a one-step self-etching adhesive system (Futurabond – FB). Each specimen was restored with a composite resin and sectioned into 1.0-mm2 thick slabs. After 24 hours, resin-dentin sticks were submitted to tensile stress in a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test at a level of 0.05%.

Results: Superficial dentin showed the highest microtensile bond strength values, which differed statistically from those obtained in the deep dentin, irrespective of the adhesive system used. FB yielded the highest bond strength values, which were statistically similar to the bond strength values of SE, but statistically different from those obtained when the SB adhesive was used.

Conclusions: Bond strength obtained in superficial dentin was significantly higher than in deep dentin, for all adhesive systems tested. Adhesion was affected by the different bonding strategies: the one-step, low pH, acetone-based self-etching adhesive promoted the higher bond strength values, which were statistically similar to those obtained with the two-step, water-based self-etching adhesive. (Eur J Dent 2010;4:110-117)

Keywords

Bonding - Dentin - Self-etching adhesive - Microtensile bond strength
 

  • References

  • 1 Perdigão J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L. New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion. Am J Dent 2000; 13 (Spec Issue) 25D-30D
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Pashley DH. Dentin: A dynamic substrate. Review. Scanning Microsc 1989; 3: 161-176
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Marshall Jr GW, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate: Structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent 1997; 25: 441-458
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Panighi M, G’Sell C. Effect of tooth microstructure on the shear bond strength of a dental composite. J Biomed Mater Res 1993; 27: 975-981
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Garberoglio R, Brännström M. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of human dentinal tubules. Arch Oral Biol 1976; 21: 355-362
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Characterization of the hybrid layer. In Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Tokyo: Quintessence Publishing Co, Ltd; 1998: 57-85
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Nakabayashi N. Bonding of restorative materials to dentine: The present status in Japan. Int Dent J 1985; 35: 145-154
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Pashley DH. The clinical correlations of dentin structure and function. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 777-781
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-235
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Gwinnett AJ. Quantitative contribution of resin infiltration/ hybridization to dentin bonding. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 7-9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3757-3785
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Giannini M, Reis AF, Arrais CA. Effect of dentinal depth on the tensile bond strength of a self-etching adhesive system. RPG rev. pos-grad 2002; 9: 43-50
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Toledano M, Osorio R, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV, Fernandes CA, Tay FR, Carvalho RM. Microtensile bond strength of several adhesive systems to different dentin depths. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 292-298
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Van Meerbeek B, Vargas S, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent 2001; Suppl 6: 119-144
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Tagami J, Tao L, Pashley DH. Correlation among dentin depth permeability and bond strength of adhesive resins. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 45-50
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Pashley EL, Tao L, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Bond strengths to superficial, intermediate and deep dentin in vivo with four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 19-22
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Lopes GC, Perdigão J, Lopes Mde F, Vieira LC, Baratieri LN, Monteiro Jr S. Dentin bond strengths of simplified adhesives: effect of dentin depth. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2006; 27: 340-345
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 118-132
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Toledano M, Proença JP, Erhardt MC, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Osorio R, Tay FR. Increases in dentin-bond strength if doubling application time of an acetone-containing onestep adhesive. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 133-137
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 454-458
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Perdigão J, Gomes G, Gondo R, Fundingsland JW. In vitro bonding performance of all-in-one adhesives. Part I--microtensile bond strengths. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8: 367-373
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Spencer P, Wang Y, Walker MP, Wielczka DM. Interfacial chemistry of the dentin/adhesive bond. J Dent Res 2000; 16: 406-411
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Osorio R, Pisani-Proenca J, Erhardt MC, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Tay FR, Toledano M. Resistance of ten contemporary adhesives to resin-dentine bond degradation. J Dent 2008; 36: 163-169
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar