Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2019; 08(03): 161-167
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698281
Original Article
Neurological Surgeons' Society of India

A Comparative Study of Orotracheal Intubation Guided by Airtraq and McCoy Laryngoscope in Patients with Rigid Cervical Collar In-situ Simulating Cervical Immobilization for Traumatic Cervical Spine Injury

Akhil Diwan
1   Department of Anesthesia, SMS Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
,
Shobha Purohit
1   Department of Anesthesia, SMS Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 27 April 2019

Accepted: 29 July 2019

Publication Date:
30 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Immobilization of cervical spine is of utmost importance in patients with cervical injury, making intubation a difficult task due to the application of cervical collar. This study was done to assess which laryngoscope (Airtraq or McCoy) is better for intubation and prevents the deleterious effects of hypoxia by comparing the intubation time.

Methods A prospective interventional randomized study was undertaken in 60 adult patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II, aged between 20 and 50 years, scheduled for various surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation for anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to undergo intubation with either the Airtraq (Group A; n = 30) laryngoscope or McCoy (Group B; n = 30). Patients were intubated following the standard anesthetic protocol, and the differences in duration of intubation, changes in the hemodynamic parameters in response to intubation, modified intubation difficulty score, and airway complications between the Airtraq and the McCoy laryngoscope were compared.

Results Overall intubation success rates were 100% with both devices and a similar number of intubation attempts were required. Though the mean time required for successful intubation was less with the Airtraq (25.2 ± 5.11 seconds) than the McCoy laryngoscope (27.3 ± 4.47 seconds); it was statistically insignificant (p = 0.14). Intubation difficulty score and ease of insertion were significantly less in Airtraq laryngoscope when compared with McCoy laryngoscope. Increase in the heart rate and mean arterial pressure was significantly more just after intubation with McCoy in comparison with Airtraq laryngoscope. However, the frequencies of airway complications were similar.

Conclusion Intubation time despite being lesser with the Airtraq than the McCoy laryngoscope was statistically insignificant, and overall success rates between the two devices were similar.

Keywords

Airtraq laryngoscope - McCoy laryngoscope - duration of intubation - hemodynamic response
 

  • References

  • 1 Goldberg W, Mueller C, Panacek E, Tigges S, Hoffman JR, Mower WR. NEXUS Group. Distribution and patterns of blunt traumatic cervical spine injury. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38 (01) 17-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dunham CM, Barraco RD, Clark DE. et al. EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group. Guidelines for emergency tracheal intubation immediately after traumatic injury. J Trauma 2003; 55 (01) 162-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Stein DM, Menaker J, McQuillan K, Handley C, Aarabi B, Scalea TM. Risk factors for organ dysfunction and failure in patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Neurocrit Care 2010; 13 (01) 29-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hastings RH, Kelley SD. Neurologic deterioration associated with airway management in a cervical spine-injured patient. Anesthesiology 1993; 78 (03) 580-583
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Goutcher CM, Lochhead V. Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95 (03) 344-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wakeling HG, Nightingale J. The intubating laryngeal mask airway does not facilitate tracheal intubation in the presence of a neck collar in simulated trauma. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84 (02) 254-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Heath KJ. The effect of laryngoscopy of different cervical spine immobilisation techniques. Anaesthesia 1994; 49 (10) 843-845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gercek E, Wahlen BM, Rommens PM. In vivo ultrasound real-time motion of the cervical spine during intubation under manual in-line stabilization: a comparison of intubation methods. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25 (01) 29-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Prasarn ML, Conrad B, Rubery PT. et al. Comparison of 4 airway devices on cervical spine alignment in a cadaver model with global ligamentous instability at C5-C6. Spine 2012; 37 (06) 476-481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fuchs G, Schwarz G, Baumgartner A, Kaltenböck F, Voit-Augustin H, Planinz W. Fiberoptic intubation in 327 neurosurgical patients with lesions of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1999; 11 (01) 11-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Durga P, Kaur J, Ahmed SY, Kaniti G, Ramachandran G. Comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq(®) and Mc Coy laryngoscope in the presence of rigid cervical collar simulating cervical immobilisation for traumatic cervical spine injury. Indian J Anaesth 2012; 56 (06) 529-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sarvaiya N, Thakur DP, Tendolkar BA. A comparative study of endotracheal intubation as per intubation difficulty score, using Airtraq and McCoy laryngoscopes with manual-in-line axial stabilization of cervical spine in adult patients. Int J Res Med Sci 2016; 4 (08) 3211-3218
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Umamaheswara Rao GS. Anaesthetic and intensive care management of traumatic cervical spine injury. Indian J Anaesth 2008; 52: 13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Smith CE, Pinchak AB, Sidhu TS, Radesic BP, Pinchak AC, Hagen JF. Evaluation of tracheal intubation difficulty in patients with cervical spine immobilization: fiberoptic (WuScope) versus conventional laryngoscopy. Anesthesiology 1999; 91 (05) 1253-1259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Forbes AM, Dally FG. Acute hypertension during induction of anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation in normotensive man. Br J Anaesth 1970; 42 (07) 618-624
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Maharaj CH, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy–a manikin study. Anaesthesia 2006; 61 (05) 469-477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Maharaj CH, Costello JF, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Evaluation of the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients at increased risk for difficult tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2008; 63 (02) 182-188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Maharaj CH, O'Croinin D, Curley G, Harte BH, Laffey JG. A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: A randomised, controlled clinical trial. Anaesthesia 2006; 61 (11) 1093-1099
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Turkstra TP, Pelz DM, Jones PM. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison of the AirTraq Laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesthesiology 2009; 111 (01) 97-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Koh JC, Lee JS, Lee YW, Chang CH. Comparison of the laryngeal view during intubation using Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization and mouth opening limitation. Korean J Anesthesiol 2010; 59 (05) 314-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Arslan ZI, Yildiz T, Baykara ZN, Solak M, Toker K. Tracheal intubation in patients with rigid collar immobilisation of the cervical spine: a comparison of Airtraq and LMA CTrach devices. Anaesthesia 2009; 64 (12) 1332-1336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on management of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology 1993; 78 (03) 597-602
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Murphy P. A fibre-optic endoscope used for nasal intubation. Anaesthesia 1967; 22 (03) 489-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Haidry MA, Khan FA. Comparison of hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2013; 29 (02) 196-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Komatsu R, Kamata K, Sessler DI, Ozaki M. A comparison of the Airway Scope and McCoy laryngoscope in patients with simulated restricted neck mobility. Anaesthesia 2010; 65 (06) 564-568
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Joseph J, Sequeira T, Upadya M. Comparison of the use of McCoy and TruView EVO2 laryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Saudi J Anaesth 2012; 6 (03) 248-253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Maruyama K, Yamada T, Kawakami R, Kamata T, Yokochi M, Hara K. Upper cervical spine movement during intubation: fluoroscopic comparison of the AirWay Scope, McCoy laryngoscope, and Macintosh laryngoscope. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100 (01) 120-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ali QE, Das B, Amir SH, Siddiqui OA, Jamil S. Comparison of the Airtraq and McCoy laryngoscopes using a rigid neck collar in patients with simulated difficult laryngoscopy. J Clin Anesth 2014; 26 (03) 199-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Nishiyama T, Higashizawa T, Bito H, Konishi A, Sakai T. [Which laryngoscope is the most stressful in laryngoscopy; Macintosh, Miller, or McCoy?]. Masui 1997; 46 (11) 1519-1524
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 McCoy EP, Mirakhur RK. The levering laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 1993; 48 (06) 516-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Farling PA. The McCoy levering laryngoscope blade. Anaesthesia 1994; 49 (04) 358
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Tewari P, Gupta D, Kumar A, Singh U. Opioid sparing during endotracheal intubation using McCoy laryngoscope in neurosurgical patients: the comparison of haemodynamic changes with Macintosh blade in a randomized trial. J. Postgrad Med 2005; 51 (04) 260-264
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Han TS, Kin JA, Park NG, Lee SM, Cho HS, Chung IS. A comparison of the effects of different types of laryngoscope on haemodynamics: McCoy versus the Macintosh blade. Korean J Anesthesiol 1999; 37 (03) 398-401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Román J, Beltrán de Heredia B, García-Velasco P. et al. Hemodynamic response to intubation with Macintosh and McCoy blades [article in Spanish]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 1996; 43 (05) 177-179
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Shimoda O, Ikuta Y, Isayama S, Sakamoto M, Terasaki H. Skin vasomotor reflex induced by laryngoscopy: comparison of the McCoy and Macintosh blades. Br J Anaesth 1997; 79 (06) 714-718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar