Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2007; 01(03): 132-138
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698328
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

The Prevalence of Carotid Artery Calcification on the Panoramic Radiographs in Cappadocia Region Population

Yildiray Sisman
a   Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri
,
Elif Tarim Ertas
b   Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri
,
Cumali Gokce
c   Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri
,
Ahmed Menku
d   Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri
,
Mustafa Ulker
e   Department of Conservative Dentistry,Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri
,
Faruk Akgunlu
f   Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
27. September 2019 (online)

Preview

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine retrospectively the presence of carotid artery calcifications (CACs) detected on panoramic radiographs (PRs) in a group of Turkish population. Further, the relationships between CACs and gender, life style, and medical history were evaluated.

Methods:During the years 2004 to 2006, a random sample of 1282 PRs was collected from patients older than 40 years who were being treated by the School of Dentistry, Erciyes University. Of these 1282 PRs, 750 PRs were included in this study. Medical data was collected from the archival records of the dental school.

Results: About 38 (5.06%) CACs were found on the PRs of 12 (4.5%) males and 26 (5.4%) females. The CAC prevalence was not significantly different between the males and females (P=0.583). These calcifications were unilateral in 26 (68.4%) and bilateral in 12 (31.6%) subjects. Of those in the positive group, there were 12 subjects (31.58%) with hyperlipidemia, 12 subjects (31.58%) with hypertension, 7 subjects (18.4%) with diabetes mellitus, 6 subjects (15.8%) with cardiovascular disease, and 6 subjects (15.8%) with smoking history.

Conclusions: This study has the highest CACs prevalence in comparison to the other studies. Therefore, dentists caring for subjects with dental problems should carefully evaluate their PRs for the evidence of CACs, and refer them for medical evaluation as indicated. So, incidental findings could provide life-saving information. (Eur J Dent 2007;1:132-138)